夏木KRIS
--
No one should be responsible for Liangxi, except for himself.
After Liangxi's liquidation, the community was filled with questions, sympathy, anger, and even voices saying, 'Liangxi owes me an explanation.' But let's be clear: no one owes you an explanation, and no one should be responsible for Liangxi except for himself.
In the cryptocurrency circle, behaviors like 'delegated trading,' 'joint accounts,' and 'real trading following' create a gray area of responsibility for many KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders). They emphasize that their trading is 'real and genuine,' while hiding risks behind a persona of 'I am also losing,' using emotions as a firewall and liquidation as a get-out-of-jail-free card.
However, real trading is a choice, not an excuse.
Delegated accounts are a responsibility, not a waiver of liability.
If Liangxi had said before the liquidation, 'I can't hold on any longer, I suggest you don't short with me,' that would be taking responsibility;
If he chooses to review mistakes immediately after the liquidation and acknowledges the blind trust in the direction, that is maturity.
But if he only talks about collapse, pain, the size of his position, and despair, then that is not taking responsibility, it is shifting the focus.
Everyone who engages in real trading should understand: once you showcase your trades, it is no longer just your own business; once you let others trust you with their money, you are responsible for their funds.
Liangxi's liquidation is not 'the market betraying him,' it is that he failed to uphold the most basic bottom line of a trader: face your choices and bear all the consequences.
You can feel sorry for him, but don't make excuses for him. This situation should never have played out this way from the start.
#BTC再创新高 #BTC挑战11万大关 $BTC #凉兮
After Liangxi's liquidation, the community was filled with questions, sympathy, anger, and even voices saying, 'Liangxi owes me an explanation.' But let's be clear: no one owes you an explanation, and no one should be responsible for Liangxi except for himself.
In the cryptocurrency circle, behaviors like 'delegated trading,' 'joint accounts,' and 'real trading following' create a gray area of responsibility for many KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders). They emphasize that their trading is 'real and genuine,' while hiding risks behind a persona of 'I am also losing,' using emotions as a firewall and liquidation as a get-out-of-jail-free card.
However, real trading is a choice, not an excuse.
Delegated accounts are a responsibility, not a waiver of liability.
If Liangxi had said before the liquidation, 'I can't hold on any longer, I suggest you don't short with me,' that would be taking responsibility;
If he chooses to review mistakes immediately after the liquidation and acknowledges the blind trust in the direction, that is maturity.
But if he only talks about collapse, pain, the size of his position, and despair, then that is not taking responsibility, it is shifting the focus.
Everyone who engages in real trading should understand: once you showcase your trades, it is no longer just your own business; once you let others trust you with their money, you are responsible for their funds.
Liangxi's liquidation is not 'the market betraying him,' it is that he failed to uphold the most basic bottom line of a trader: face your choices and bear all the consequences.
You can feel sorry for him, but don't make excuses for him. This situation should never have played out this way from the start.
#BTC再创新高 #BTC挑战11万大关 $BTC #凉兮
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
