I think @virtuals_io's TP Cooldown (also known as 'paper hand penalty') has several unreasonable aspects. I'll write them down and discuss with the virgen ecosystem, which does not constitute FUD or financial investment advice:

1. For projects launching at genesis, the core income is a 70% share of transaction fees, not selling tokens. If trading is deemed as paper hands, it is clear that trading volume will decline, which I can only understand as the platform not encouraging trading.

2. Rewards and punishments should not coexist. The staking of agent tokens can obtain more quota for new token offerings, which itself can reduce selling pressure, while the TP Cooldown adds another layer of locking from a punishment perspective, which is not very meaningful.

3. It hinders value discovery. Without sufficient trading and turnover, the chips remain in the hands of the first batch of users participating in the new offerings, which essentially caps the market value.

Now, the virtual team itself is probably quite worried. Aside from pulling the token with zero-cost $virtual and then going on CEX (preferably bn alpha), there aren't many incremental players entering. For example, during today's $virgen launch, I did not see anyone in any alpha groups outside of the virtual ecosystem group posting CA.

Overall, I think the virtual team has a good grasp of the rhythm of ve33 and slow trading, but a system that combines staking and point systems is definitely not a vibrant ecosystem; there are already many failed examples.

This is a rational discussion, purely for leisure writing; there are no advertising fees or consulting fees for this article.