You are considering from the perspective of the studio, receiving in batches. Retail investors only have one or two accounts, and waiting a month to receive once? I suggest that all studio accounts be banned, so everyone can benefit without competition; it has always been the studio that disrupts the rules.

After chasing Alpha for so long, I still haven't gotten any, and Binance's new scoring rules feel equally unreasonable. Mining on the BSC chain 4096, 15 points a day, 225 points in 15 days, this admission score is something many can likely achieve. The same goes for studios; the more people there are, the less the rewards. So, they can only continue to raise the score threshold, and then it's just a competition for the sake of competition, an endless cycle of manipulation. Binance's rule aims for future users to also receive benefits. If that's the case, I have a suggestion: fix the admission score and set a specific timeframe for receiving rewards (like every 20 or 30 days), and the airdrop rewards don't need to be so high each time, for example, this time 50u, next time 300u, increasing uncertainty, allowing users to choose which one to claim. Even if this time you don't get the big reward, at least you received something, and there's always a next time, which won't discourage user participation. There’s no need to compete for the sake of competition, let users actively participate instead of being manipulated. I believe this kind of on-chain activity is healthier and can reward every participating user. @币安广场