Is the most efficient method for brushing alpha trading volume reliable? 🧐

I believe everyone has seen the methods of brushing between different cryptocurrencies in the BSC sector, but there is still skepticism about whether it is feasible. Yesterday, I conducted an experiment with a secondary account to test the feasibility of this method #币安Alpha空投SOON

In the first group in the image, I used a method to brush a trading volume of 3300U. The second group is the trading volume of 3300U that I brushed using the conventional method #我的EOS交易

The loss in the first group is approximately 1103.41-1102.56=0.85u

The loss in the second group is approximately 1102.56-1101.91=0.65u

It can be seen that both methods brushed the same trading volume in almost the same time period, and mutual brushing incurs about 30% more loss than the conventional method. Taking the brushing of the 16000 level (corresponding to the 32000 level in BSC) as an example, mutual brushing incurs approximately 0.97u more loss per day than the conventional method #币安AlphaSUI生态交易竞赛

Of course, the above is just my conclusion drawn from one account and only one experiment, which is not universal. It expresses a personal opinion, and the specific loss still depends on market changes. If you use mutual brushing, it is best to do so when the fluctuations of the two cryptocurrencies are relatively small; the loss may be lower than the conventional method and may even be better. If you are a big player and this slight loss does not matter, mutual brushing is still a pretty good method, as it saves more time compared to the conventional method.