Recently, people often ask how to allocate offensive positions. In fact, this fundamentally depends on each person's risk tolerance.
I have always maintained a viewpoint:
More than 70% of the positions must be allocated to BTC or stablecoin investments—the key to asset appreciation has never been about betting everything on a single coin but about surviving through scientific position management.
Think about it, what if you bet wrong? Do you have to work for ten years to pay off debts, or rely on new projects to break even from scratch? All-in essentially means giving up the margin for error, but in reality, there is no "resurrection script"; no one can predict all the ups and downs with a god's perspective.
For example: If you use 10% of your assets to earn a 3-5 times return, and the current market rhythm aligns with your judgment, it can indeed be reasonable to use the profits for aggressive operations. Because at this point, your safety cushion is thick enough, and you can even allocate 40-50% of your assets to high-risk targets—provided that these positions, even if they all go to zero, will not affect your quality of life.
As for myself, I am currently in a "low-desire investment state": occasionally playing with small contracts, picking up some small gains, and making enough pocket money. The reason I still stay in the circle is that I believe there are still structural dividends here—compared to daily indulgence that rusts the brain, maintaining observation and reflection in the market feels more like a "brain workout".
Brothers, remember: surviving in the crypto world is not about who makes the most in the short term, but about who lasts the longest. We won’t leave the circle, but we need to stay clear-headed.
