Playing on BNBChain, happiness comes in waves, and the inability to sustain profit-making effects seems to be the biggest issue.

1. CZ and the leading figure are deliberately not interacting with the project, with some interns, official accounts, etc., posting some hot topics, but most of the time it feels like a one-time event. It’s unclear if the officials are paying attention to the price trends. Once posted, there is almost no follow-up.

Suggestion: There could be rhythmic interactions, for example, for those that have already launched, various official accounts could interact rhythmically. Departments could also hold meetings with each other. If that doesn't work, they could leverage other forces, such as BNBChain and Fourmeme, with Alpha as the endpoint for most projects, which could be delayed.

2. The officials are supporting already launched older projects, and the attitude is quite evident, but the effect is not so apparent, still a sustainability issue. When news comes out, there may be a surge, but it doesn't last.

Suggestion: The fund purchases from BNBChain could be scheduled within a time frame, such as once a week, allowing people to have some rhythm to wait. The fund can be divided into two parts, arranging both new memes and old memes. After all, buying into smaller pools for new memes will have bigger price fluctuations, making it more exciting. This way, it can naturally trap those who love to chase peaks, and once they are caught, they will start to build.

3. There are many insiders and high control of the market, with the conspiracy being too obvious. There are almost no real user projects; as long as you know who is behind it, it’s certain that Alpha and the contracts will rise, and even spot trading will follow. This allows a small number of informed individuals to profit, but the majority of retail investors can't muster enthusiasm because they know it has nothing to do with small investors.

Suggestion: I suggest that this kind of information be given to me; if not, I will spread FUD.

4. The PVP projects have too many chips held by certain individuals, making others reluctant to join. Even if these individuals do not buy at the bottom, they will re-establish a table to acquire at the bottom.

Suggestion: I hope to quickly see the marked addresses of certain individuals and the proportion of chips they hold, along with risk warnings. Although this approach may not be very reasonable, it is very necessary; even unofficial information is crucial.