$BTC

Bitcoin is not 'digital gold'; equating it with gold undermines a currency innovation that fundamentally disrupts the traditional financial system. This article is sourced from Isaiah Austin's article in Bitcoin Magazine, compiled and written by Yuliya from PANews. (Background: US April CPI hits a four-year low) The likelihood of Fed rate cuts increases, Bitcoin approaches $105,000, US stocks rise) (Additional context: Trump's second son confirms holding a large amount of Bitcoin: My father also holds a lot, optimistic about BTC becoming digital gold) Labeling Bitcoin as 'digital gold' is a misunderstanding of this revolutionary form of currency. This statement simplifies Bitcoin to being merely a store of value asset, obscuring its deeper technological advantages and financial potential. Analogy is a common way for humans to understand new things; when faced with the unprecedented concept of Bitcoin, people naturally tend to find a reference model. Before the general public deeply understands the underlying mechanisms of Bitcoin, 'digital gold' is undoubtedly an intuitive and easily accepted analogy. Bitcoin is scarce, universally applicable, and has store of value functions, so it seems reasonable to refer to it as 'digital gold'. $BTC