#MEMEAct

🚨 Are politicians using blockchain to finance campaigns? 💸 Sam Liccardo, the Democratic congressman from California, says ENOUGH

What's it about?

👉 PROHIBITED for politicians to create tokens to gain support or do propaganda.

👉 *Goodbye to "TrumpCoins" and other coins that rise like rockets… and fall like meteors 💥 .

PROS ✅:

- Less electoral pump & dump*: No more promises of "moon" to win votes!

- Protected novice investors: Don't let them sell you smoke with a WhatsApp whitepaper.

- Politics ≠ Wallet: Separate activism from the candidates' pockets.

CONS ❌:

- Are we killing innovation?: Blockchain was born to be free, are we now regulating even memes?

- Who defines "politician"? 😏 Does a Shiba Inu profile with a flag count? .

- Alternative funding at risk*: Legitimate projects could be left in limbo.

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

The $TRUMP token moved $2 billion in days… and then crashed. Investment or a pyramid scheme with hashtags? 🤔 .

BEFORE INVESTING IN A "PEOPLE'S MEMECOIN"…

🔍 Ask:

- Is it a politician or a bot? If the CEO appears on Fox News and CoinMarketCap, run!

- Real utility? If it only serves to buy MAGA hats on Metamask, next.

- Who benefits if it falls? Spoiler: not you, but the politician does .

🧠 MORAL:

Blockchain is not a rally. If you want to invest without drama, better look for projects with real technology (and zero tweets from Trump).

(And if you take a risk, let it be with cat memes, not campaigns 🐱💻) .

🔥 PS: Would you buy a token from a politician? 👇 (Vote with a like/RT and comment your favorite meme that no one would regulate).