#AltcoinETFsPostponed #AltcoinETFsPostponed Strategic Vision or Organizational Fear?

With the increasing institutional interest in the world of cryptocurrencies, the focus is no longer limited to "Bitcoin" and "Ethereum"; attention is now turning to alternative coins (Altcoins) such as Solana, Polkadot, and Avalanche. Despite the growing demand from investors for the launch of ETF funds based on these currencies, U.S. regulatory bodies, particularly the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have decided to delay the approval of many of these funds. However, is the delay merely a regulatory caution? Or is it a hidden strategy with deeper economic and geopolitical dimensions?

Is there a "political arrangement" for cryptocurrencies?

It is rare to discuss the idea that there is a "political arrangement" for cryptocurrencies, where certain coins are marketed and adopted gradually according to global economic priorities. For example, the Bitcoin ETF was passed after years of waiting, while the Ethereum ETF is still in the approval queue. As for alternative coins, despite their technical evolution, they are always placed in the waiting category.

Could regulatory bodies be waiting for a mature regulatory environment that allows alternative coins to be introduced under a stricter system before allowing them to be widely traded in public markets?

Delayed Altcoin ETF Funds

The delay in investment funds freezes a portion of the institutional liquidity that was supporting emerging blockchain projects.