From the current perspective, the scoring strategy for Alpha points has quietly changed.
Some people have already stopped accounts with scores that are too low, because their scores no longer meet the threshold. Being rejected time and again means wasting efforts, so it's better to cut ties.
This is similar to being poor in studies; staying in school is just a waste of time. It’s better to enter society early and seek other paths.
There are also people who are still insisting on scoring points every day, adding 9-10 points daily. Although they still can't reach the threshold score, once the 15-day painful period is over, everyone's scores will tend to stabilize (since more points are being deducted), making the starting line somewhat fairer.
This is akin to saying that even if I’m not good at studying, I still study. I may not achieve much now, but it will be better once I get to university.
How should I put it? There are pros and cons; there are successful people in society who don’t have high academic qualifications. There are also many examples of success through hard work and gradual accumulation.
However, in terms of return, my suggestion is to stop if you can't meet the threshold. 15 days is not a short period in the crypto world, and whether this model will still exist after 15 days is uncertain. Even if the scores converge after 15 days, can the profits then be like the current wild period? (Because once scores are similar, everyone qualifies, leading to competition where there are more wolves than meat.) Moreover, those who have always met the threshold have already exceeded 1kU in returns. What can I use to compare with them? In the end, it’s myself who suffers the losses.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.See T&Cs.
