Bitget's operation really redefined "market manipulation"!
100U can stir up the market? Are the leeks so capable now?
They would rather block the user's account than admit the market maker's mistake
Isn't this equivalent to exposing that the contract is not "decentralized market making" at all?
Shouldn't the market maker bear the responsibility for the mistake?
As a result, the user was accused of "manipulating the market"
I am very curious:
- How did the user manipulate it specifically?
- How did a mere 100U shake up the exchange market?
The way this incident was handled was a textbook-level blame-shifting
Can anyone teach me the secret?
100U can stir up the market? Are the leeks so capable now?
They would rather block the user's account than admit the market maker's mistake
Isn't this equivalent to exposing that the contract is not "decentralized market making" at all?
Shouldn't the market maker bear the responsibility for the mistake?
As a result, the user was accused of "manipulating the market"
I am very curious:
- How did the user manipulate it specifically?
- How did a mere 100U shake up the exchange market?
The way this incident was handled was a textbook-level blame-shifting
Can anyone teach me the secret?
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
VOXEL
0.1227
+63.38%
BANKUSDT
Perp
0.03636
-4.58%
RFC
Alpha
0.015529
-26.78%