Today the market is doing great, but there aren't many tasks.
Just a brief note:
In the future, are sign-in airdrop projects still worth doing?
Before making a judgment, let's take a look at the types of sign-in projects that generally exist:
1⃣ Web2 style: Centralized daily sign-ins with points;
2⃣ Web3 style: Pay GAS on-chain, daily sign-ins with points. Most of these projects are concentrated on the #BSC #BASE chains; there are also platforms specifically for on-chain interactions, such as @OnChainGm; including many new testnet projects that follow this pathway, for example, projects on @monad_xyz, where you can receive $MONAD faucet based on the number of sign-in days.
3⃣ Task interaction type: Most are utilizing AI as a guise, training by conversing with AI daily; for example, the cow farming of @EclipseFND, clicking daily.
Once we are familiar with these sign-in methods, let's review some sign-in project parties that have historical precedents. Did they airdrop, and how were the airdrop returns?
❌ First, let's talk about the 'Web2-style' sign-in projects. So far, I have not received any airdrop; if I must mention one, then @dedotfi counts as one (verified with group friends, the actual airdrop comes from the number of invitations).
For this type of project, there is no on-chain centralized data, and casually modifying some numbers in the database is a form of insider trading, who knows how many pests are infesting the black box.
✅ Let's take a look at the second type of GAS consumption sign-in projects, this type of project is the most common, and during airdrops, they will somewhat consider continuous sign-ins (📢 Note: This refers to continuous sign-ins for a specified number of days, such as 10 days, 2 weeks, 1 month, etc.). Good returns include @BuildOnCyber @nfprompt; poor returns include @Web3Go flying leaves.
In this type, there are also people who don't do it, such as @RealBalanceFun, which not only stabbed node users in the back but has not given a single cent to sign-in users so far.
❌ Task interaction type, most of these projects depend on the project party's vision, so far, I have not seen any project party airdrop.
The above is just my personal experience, summarized:
For sign-in projects, it's better not to engage in them in the future.
- Truly valuable projects do not need to rely on sign-ins to maintain popularity.
Well, if it has to be done, can it still be done?
It is possible if you are a scientist or have friends who write scripts. I suggest you,
- Prioritize choosing on-chain projects that require continuous sign-ins.
- Use automated scripts to handle repetitive tasks.
- Maintain reasonable expectations for returns.
May everyone have a good life this year!