#TrumpVsPowell

**Analysis of the Trump-Powell Conflict: Monetary Policy, Tariffs, and Institutional Independence**

**1. Context of the Conflict**

- **Trump’s Demands**: Trump has repeatedly called for aggressive rate cuts, arguing that the Fed’s current stance (4.25%–4.5%) is stifling economic growth.

- **Powell’s Resistance**: The Fed has maintained rates, citing inflation risks from Trump’s tariffs (e.g., 10% on most imports, 145% on Chinese goods). Powell warned that tariffs could cause "higher inflation and slower growth".

---

**2. Key Issues at Stake**

**a. Inflation vs. Growth**

- Trump claims inflation is under control (2.4% as of March 2025) and accuses Powell of delaying rate cuts to harm the economy. However, Powell argues tariffs could reverse progress, as seen in 2022 when supply-chain disruptions drove inflation to 9.1% .

- The ECB’s rate cuts are framed as proactive, but ECB President Christine Lagarde acknowledged they were a response to Trump’s tariffs causing a "negative demand shock" .

**b. Fed Independence**

- Powell asserts the Fed’s legal independence, noting chairs cannot be removed except "for cause" and that his term runs until May 2026 .

- Trump claims he could fire Powell, citing precedents like his dismissal of FTC and NCUA officials. A pending Supreme Court case

---

**3. Economic and Political Implications**

- **Market Uncertainty**: Trump’s tariffs triggered stock market volatility and a sell-off in U.S. bonds. Analysts warn that firing Powell could destabilize markets further and risk stagflation .

- **Public Perception**: Trump’s narrative (e.g., "USA is getting rich on tariffs") clashes with data: egg prices rose to $6.23/dozen, and economists dispute tariff revenue claims .

---

**4. Legal and Institutional Standoff**

- **Termination Threats**: While Trump insists Powell would resign.

**Conclusion**

The Trump-Powell clash underscores a broader struggle between political pressure and institutional independence.