1. Whether the dazzling economic flywheels of berachain can be sustained.
a.1 Can various pools with thousands of APRs be sustained? I have been playing in berachain for almost a week, and based on my observations, very few pools can maintain 1000%+ APR for a day, most of them are from a certain altcoin TGE of berachain, with the price increase combined with project team boosting a large number of validators, pushing the pool rewards up.

a.2 Then smart people will find that this thing is very similar to going long; at this time, if you group LP in, you are paying a higher price. If the coin price retreats after a surge, your impermanent loss needs to be less than the interest income from APR, or, participate before TGE to set up LP first. So currently, I think high ARP new mines can be rushed, but either enter at the beginning, don't wait too long to enter, as the longer you wait, the easier it is to suffer from the drop.

b.1 The economic flywheels of various chains on berachain ultimately rely on the excess boost rewards of BGT. So can it be understood this way:
① Under normal circumstances, the APR of vaults should not be greater than the highest APR in boosts.


② If it does not conform to ①, it is either unsustainable (the project party is subsidizing), or during the income process, various fees align APR with boost ARP (for example, various XBGT recently)

c. So, what if the rewards from berachain's treasury can't actually provide such large rewards? This is the point I am most curious about, because berachain does not have such high gas fees, so the actual income generated by the public chain should not be high, how does it provide such large treasury rewards?
① First of all, everyone knows it's a Ponzi (laughs)

② Another point, I guess there might be relatively few people playing berachain now, so temporarily it’s enough to distribute. According to defillama data statistics, berachain's TVL ranks 7th, in comparison, the 12th is the previous DEFI leader Sonic. However, the market value of berachain is currently about 1/3 of Sonic (data from Binance). At the same time, most of the active top-ranking whales on debank also do not play berachain, or their asset proportion is low.

2. Some recent possible mining risks & tips.
a. First of all, this round of tariffs war has caused a sharp decline,$BERA leading the way, it has halved. This shows that everyone participating in the fund is quite cautious, and when running, each one is faster than the last (laughs). In terms of coin-based thinking for mining, the main funds definitely try to avoid grouping with altcoins | bera-like LPs. I generally group xBGT | xBera types, which relatively$BERA will not have outrageous price fluctuations.

b. For some known high-probability downward risks. At this time, one should decisively abandon coin-based thinking, exit the pool, convert funds into U, or enter double stablecoin pools like HONEY | USDC for hedging. I previously avoided the drop from 5 to 3 using this method. With these two methods, in less than a week, I mined $$BERA 800 from 700, Ponzi schemes are indeed tempting. 😅

c. A little concern. On May 6, the unlocking of staking on berachain and the receipt of airdrops should cause considerable selling pressure. Coincidentally, on the 6th-7th, there will be a Federal Reserve meeting, and according to this year's dot plot, it should release the first interest rate cut signal. I wonder if the project team intentionally adjusted the timing because of this. However, based on the principle of seeking stability, refer to the survival plan mentioned above.

Lastly, I want to complain about Binance's PC version article editor; I don’t know where the code was copied from, it neither supports MD nor has many functions like line breaks/indentation/line spacing, and there are many inexplicable parts, making formatting very difficult, especially when pasting content written elsewhere.