Pi Network should be ashamed of using the "Dr." title from Stanford as a shield for credibility, while the project they built over six years saw its price drop drastically in just over a month of trading.

For years, they have boasted about the academic background of their founders as a guarantee of the project's reliability, yet the end result shows an inability to create a sustainable ecosystem. If they truly had a grand vision for a blockchain-based financial revolution, why did Pi's price crash as soon as it became tradeable? This isn’t just normal volatility—it’s a clear indication that the years of hype were not backed by strong fundamentals.

An academic degree does not guarantee the success of a crypto project, and in the case of Pi Network, it seems more like a marketing tool than actual proof of technical excellence or economic innovation.