被迫暴富2025
--
I was a bit worried when I saw so many foreigners in the organizational structure @binance really went towards the direction of traditional large enterprises, suffering from big company syndrome, becoming more and more old-fashioned, and getting further away from users.
It is very obvious that recently, their actions have finally shown a bit of the momentum from their early days, especially after that 6-hour Space with @heyibinance. Although Binance's recent vote to delist is not exactly a benefit for users, it is indeed a step towards purifying the industry environment:
Continuously launching new coins while not delisting old ones, isn't that just dispersing funds? It would be better to delist a bunch of zombie coins to avoid selling the shell and then playing tricks to harvest again. Moreover, community voting to delist also eliminates the risk of being pressured by project parties, providing a good reason.
I looked at the observation list, and many of the coins inside are memories of the old batch of people, and they were once extremely popular. For example, the $Jasmy that left people dumbfounded when it was hyped, the $Bal and $Badger which were top choices during the DeFi era, and the representative of the glorious BSC period, $Alpaca. The most wronged should be the $GPS which recently bore the brunt of the anger from MM.
One problem is that Binance hasn't said how many will be delisted this time. It's possible that project parties that don’t want to be delisted might come out to buy votes for other exchanges, right? If a friend dies, I won't die poor, so in a way, that's a benefit coming out.
Currently, I would choose $CREAM (the cash machine of friends) $SNT (the first generation of blockchain WeChat) $BETA (a DEFI that has never pumped since going on Binance, only dumping) $MBL (on-chain video distribution, thoroughly falsifying the narrative). I haven't thought of another one yet, so I'll just randomly pick an ugly one.
It is very obvious that recently, their actions have finally shown a bit of the momentum from their early days, especially after that 6-hour Space with @heyibinance. Although Binance's recent vote to delist is not exactly a benefit for users, it is indeed a step towards purifying the industry environment:
Continuously launching new coins while not delisting old ones, isn't that just dispersing funds? It would be better to delist a bunch of zombie coins to avoid selling the shell and then playing tricks to harvest again. Moreover, community voting to delist also eliminates the risk of being pressured by project parties, providing a good reason.
I looked at the observation list, and many of the coins inside are memories of the old batch of people, and they were once extremely popular. For example, the $Jasmy that left people dumbfounded when it was hyped, the $Bal and $Badger which were top choices during the DeFi era, and the representative of the glorious BSC period, $Alpaca. The most wronged should be the $GPS which recently bore the brunt of the anger from MM.
One problem is that Binance hasn't said how many will be delisted this time. It's possible that project parties that don’t want to be delisted might come out to buy votes for other exchanges, right? If a friend dies, I won't die poor, so in a way, that's a benefit coming out.
Currently, I would choose $CREAM (the cash machine of friends) $SNT (the first generation of blockchain WeChat) $BETA (a DEFI that has never pumped since going on Binance, only dumping) $MBL (on-chain video distribution, thoroughly falsifying the narrative). I haven't thought of another one yet, so I'll just randomly pick an ugly one.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
