More than four decades ago, French philosopher Gilles Deleuze argued that true art is inseparable from the physical and emotional struggle of humans confronting chaos.
According to him, what gives rise to genuine artistic expression begins with the artist’s direct experience of uncertainty—something an algorithm can never replicate.
“If someone devotes their entire life to painting and battling clichés, it’s not a classroom exercise,” Deleuze said in a rough translation of his 1981 lecture notes. “What matters is the act of struggle, the rejection of the cliché, the creation of something.”
Today, Deleuze’s warning feels more relevant than ever, as AI-generated art—often full of familiar patterns—floods online platforms. Powered by advanced algorithms, AI tools can now create images, music, and even writing with minimal human input based on just a simple prompt.
🔹 AI Under Fire: Copyrights and the Soul of Creativity
Controversy surrounding AI continues to grow. Recently, YouTuber MrBeast took down an AI-generated thumbnail tool after backlash over artist rights. In May, Elton John criticized the UK government’s AI copyright proposals as “deeply disturbing” for creators.
Tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Anthropic are facing lawsuits over AI-generated lyrics, training on copyrighted books, and the broader question of whether training AI qualifies as “fair use.”
🔹 The Limits of Artificial Intelligence: Fundamentally Human
Max Li, founder and CEO of the decentralized AI platform OORT, stated that AI capabilities remain fundamentally limited by their human origins. Even the most advanced models are still constrained by the architectures, datasets, and objectives initially defined by humans.
“AI may mimic patterns of thinking or behavior,” Li explained, “but it lacks the kind of internal cognitive foundation or emergent understanding.” While AI behavior may at times seem surprising, “it’s ultimately bounded by the knowledge and logic we’ve given it,” he added.
🔹 Deleuze Was Right: Art Is Born from Struggle, Not Calculation
Deleuze saw creativity as an act of exploration—a physical and emotional response to the unknown. “The painter is an eye, a hand, a nervous system searching, trying all combinations, hoping something appears,” he once said.
When a painter constantly fights against cliché and repetition, every brushstroke carries emotions, doubt, and lived experience. No AI can go through that process—and that’s precisely why it cannot create art that matches true human expression.
🔹 AI as a Tool, Not a Replacement
Philosophy professor Virgilio Rivas expressed a similar view, noting that creativity alone is insufficient without human context. While AI might be used to "restore and reinvent human memory," it can never truly replace it.
While AI might help humans expand the boundaries of what can be understood or visualized, it will never have the experience necessary to create something truly new and meaningful.
🌍 Summary:
As artificial intelligence dominates digital art spaces, philosophers and technologists alike remind us: real creativity doesn’t emerge from data but from chaos, doubt, and the deeply human need to express.
#AI ,
#ArtificialInteligence ,
#OpenAI ,
#worldnews ,
#Technology Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“