Binance Square

TelegramTON

44 views
2 Discussing
Arkiv_Posts
--
The $1.7 Billion ICO That Never Launched – Telegram’s Failed Crypto Project📜 The Beginning – Telegram’s Bold Crypto Vision In 2018, Telegram, the popular encrypted messaging app, announced its ambitious plan to launch a blockchain network called Telegram Open Network (TON). The project aimed to integrate a decentralized economy within Telegram, allowing users to send money privately, outside government control. To fund TON, Telegram raised $1.7 billion through a private ICO (Initial Coin Offering), selling Grams, the network’s native token, to investors. The ICO was structured as a SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens), a legal workaround designed to avoid SEC scrutiny. 🚀 The Promise – What TON Was Supposed to Be Telegram envisioned TON as a high-speed, scalable blockchain that could: ✔️ Process millions of transactions per second ✔️ Enable decentralized applications (dApps) ✔️ Integrate directly into Telegram Messenger ✔️ Provide financial privacy for users TON was seen as a direct competitor to Ethereum, with Telegram’s massive user base giving it an edge. ⚖️ The SEC Crackdown – Why Telegram’s ICO Failed In October 2019, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed an emergency lawsuit against Telegram, arguing that the $1.7 billion ICO was an illegal securities offering. 🚨 Key SEC allegations: ✔️ Grams were securities, not utility tokens. ✔️ Telegram failed to register the ICO with the SEC. ✔️ The SAFT model didn’t bypass securities laws. ✔️ Telegram planned to flood U.S. markets with unregistered tokens. A New York judge sided with the SEC, blocking Telegram from launching TON. Facing legal pressure, Telegram abandoned the project in May 2020. 💰 The Aftermath – What Happened to the $1.7 Billion? ✔️ Telegram returned most of the funds to investors. ✔️ Some investors accepted a 72% refund, while others chose to wait for future compensation. ✔️ Telegram paid a $18.5 million fine to the SEC. ✔️ TON was revived by independent developers, now known as The Open Network (TON). 🔮 The Possibilities – Could Telegram Try Again? ✔️ TON still exists, but Telegram is no longer involved. ✔️ Telegram might explore crypto again, but under stricter regulations. ✔️ The SEC’s crackdown set a precedent, making future ICOs riskier. 💥 The Takeaway – A Warning for Crypto Projects ✔️ Regulation matters – The SEC won’t allow unregistered ICOs. ✔️ Big ideas need legal backing – Even billion-dollar projects can fail. ✔️ Crypto is evolving – TON’s failure shaped how new projects approach compliance. You can read more about Telegram’s failed ICO on Decrypt and the SEC’s official statement here. $TON #CryptoScandals #TelegramTON #SECvsCrypto #Write2Earn 🎬🔥

The $1.7 Billion ICO That Never Launched – Telegram’s Failed Crypto Project

📜 The Beginning – Telegram’s Bold Crypto Vision

In 2018, Telegram, the popular encrypted messaging app, announced its ambitious plan to launch a blockchain network called Telegram Open Network (TON). The project aimed to integrate a decentralized economy within Telegram, allowing users to send money privately, outside government control.

To fund TON, Telegram raised $1.7 billion through a private ICO (Initial Coin Offering), selling Grams, the network’s native token, to investors. The ICO was structured as a SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens), a legal workaround designed to avoid SEC scrutiny.

🚀 The Promise – What TON Was Supposed to Be

Telegram envisioned TON as a high-speed, scalable blockchain that could:

✔️ Process millions of transactions per second

✔️ Enable decentralized applications (dApps)

✔️ Integrate directly into Telegram Messenger

✔️ Provide financial privacy for users

TON was seen as a direct competitor to Ethereum, with Telegram’s massive user base giving it an edge.

⚖️ The SEC Crackdown – Why Telegram’s ICO Failed

In October 2019, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed an emergency lawsuit against Telegram, arguing that the $1.7 billion ICO was an illegal securities offering.

🚨 Key SEC allegations:

✔️ Grams were securities, not utility tokens.

✔️ Telegram failed to register the ICO with the SEC.

✔️ The SAFT model didn’t bypass securities laws.

✔️ Telegram planned to flood U.S. markets with unregistered tokens.

A New York judge sided with the SEC, blocking Telegram from launching TON. Facing legal pressure, Telegram abandoned the project in May 2020.

💰 The Aftermath – What Happened to the $1.7 Billion?

✔️ Telegram returned most of the funds to investors.

✔️ Some investors accepted a 72% refund, while others chose to wait for future compensation.

✔️ Telegram paid a $18.5 million fine to the SEC.

✔️ TON was revived by independent developers, now known as The Open Network (TON).

🔮 The Possibilities – Could Telegram Try Again?

✔️ TON still exists, but Telegram is no longer involved.

✔️ Telegram might explore crypto again, but under stricter regulations.

✔️ The SEC’s crackdown set a precedent, making future ICOs riskier.

💥 The Takeaway – A Warning for Crypto Projects

✔️ Regulation matters – The SEC won’t allow unregistered ICOs.

✔️ Big ideas need legal backing – Even billion-dollar projects can fail.

✔️ Crypto is evolving – TON’s failure shaped how new projects approach compliance.

You can read more about Telegram’s failed ICO on Decrypt and the SEC’s official statement here.
$TON

#CryptoScandals #TelegramTON #SECvsCrypto #Write2Earn 🎬🔥
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number