STF
4,872 views
3 Discussing
Hot
Latest
See original
🇧🇷 Yesterday, August 4, 2025, the Supreme Federal Court (STF) Minister Alexandre de Moraes decreed the house arrest of former President Jair Bolsonaro (PL) for violating previously imposed precautionary measures.
⚖️ The decision was motivated by Bolsonaro's participation, via social media, in a demonstration in Copacabana, where he used third parties to disseminate messages, challenging the prohibition on the use of social media.
💥 Bolsonaro was accused of using subterfuge to circumvent restrictions, such as displaying videos at demonstrations, which Moraes considered an affront to the STF.
❌ In addition to house arrest, new measures were imposed, such as the prohibition of receiving visitors, except for lawyers or people authorized by the STF, and the use of cell phones.
🇺🇸 Trump and the White House issued a statement via Twitter/X promising sanctions against those involved in the arrest.
👔 Bolsonaro's defense has not yet publicly commented, but the former president cooperated with the Federal Police, handing over his cell phone without resistance.
💣 The decision generated reactions, with allies like Tarcísio de Freitas calling it "absurd."
📰 The international press highlighted the case, linking it to tensions with the U.S. due to sanctions from Donald Trump.
😮 The violation of house arrest rules may lead to preventive imprisonment.
🔨 Moraes emphasized that Bolsonaro's actions, including incitement to attacks on the STF, justify the measure.
📖 The case is still under analysis, with possible developments depending on new facts or violations.
🔎 What do you all think of this entire repercussion? 🪃
#Trump #EUA #Brasil #STF #Bolsonaro $USDC $BNB $SOL
⚖️ The decision was motivated by Bolsonaro's participation, via social media, in a demonstration in Copacabana, where he used third parties to disseminate messages, challenging the prohibition on the use of social media.
💥 Bolsonaro was accused of using subterfuge to circumvent restrictions, such as displaying videos at demonstrations, which Moraes considered an affront to the STF.
❌ In addition to house arrest, new measures were imposed, such as the prohibition of receiving visitors, except for lawyers or people authorized by the STF, and the use of cell phones.
🇺🇸 Trump and the White House issued a statement via Twitter/X promising sanctions against those involved in the arrest.
👔 Bolsonaro's defense has not yet publicly commented, but the former president cooperated with the Federal Police, handing over his cell phone without resistance.
💣 The decision generated reactions, with allies like Tarcísio de Freitas calling it "absurd."
📰 The international press highlighted the case, linking it to tensions with the U.S. due to sanctions from Donald Trump.
😮 The violation of house arrest rules may lead to preventive imprisonment.
🔨 Moraes emphasized that Bolsonaro's actions, including incitement to attacks on the STF, justify the measure.
📖 The case is still under analysis, with possible developments depending on new facts or violations.
🔎 What do you all think of this entire repercussion? 🪃
#Trump #EUA #Brasil #STF #Bolsonaro $USDC $BNB $SOL
S
BNB/BRL
Price
4,107
See original
Criminals on the loose: they are breaking Brazil
Legal insecurity in Brazil has been a recurring theme, especially after decisions by Minister Alexandre de Moraes in the Supreme Federal Court (STF), which generated controversies and affect the business climate in the country. The figure of capital in Brazil, essential for attracting investors and strengthening the economy, is under pressure.
Effects of Moraes' Decisions
Moraes' decisions have been seen as excessive and, in some cases, outside what the Constitution provides. Investigations initiated under his leadership, such as the inquiry into Fake News, raised discussions about the balance of powers and the concentration of power in a single minister. Critics argue that this violates constitutional guarantees and generates a hostile environment for investors, who fear arbitrary and unpredictable decisions citation: 5.
Effects of Moraes' Decisions
Moraes' decisions have been seen as excessive and, in some cases, outside what the Constitution provides. Investigations initiated under his leadership, such as the inquiry into Fake News, raised discussions about the balance of powers and the concentration of power in a single minister. Critics argue that this violates constitutional guarantees and generates a hostile environment for investors, who fear arbitrary and unpredictable decisions citation: 5.
Login to explore more contents