ETHBreak2k

Following the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, experts are assessing the impact, particularly the damage to Iran’s nuclear programme and the status of its ballistic missile stockpile. While these elements are critical to understanding future dynamics, they tend to overlook the fact that the ceasefire has de-escalated the conflict for now, but it has not stopped it.
For Israel, the attack that began on 13 June was not a final blow, but a calculated first strike in what promises to be a prolonged conflict. In Israel, some are advocating the “Hezbollah model”—continuing to strike despite a ceasefire. Though unacknowledged by either side, it is clear that Israel is still using what some have called the “free highway to Tehran”—an aerial corridor Israel planes use to fly over Iran— to maintain air superiority over the Islamic Republic.
The Israeli security leadership envision two main trajectories that the Israel-Iran conflict can take, after the unprecedented war the two countries waged against each other. The first ends with a tougher, more limiting nuclear agreement, with Iran agreeing to make concessions it previously rejected. One of those major concessions includes renouncing any form of domestic enrichment capabilities—a demand that Iran had long considered a non-starter prior to the war.
Although Iran may come back to the table of negotiations, the chances that it will agree to such a condition are low. Indeed, in the aftermath of the 12-day war, Iran has already repeated that it has no plans to stop enrichment. Israelis have sometimes invoked the “Libya model”, where Muammar Gaddafi agreed to fully roll back his nuclear programme, at the height of the “War on Terror” and months after the US invasion of Iraq.
However, the Iranians' takeaway from this model is that Gaddafi’s decision ultimately cost him his life. Perhaps having a bomb would have prevented foreign intervention that helped unseat the Libyan dictator, and having a nuclear weapon represents the ultimate guarantee of regime survival. It is also true that Iran’s nuclear programme is what invited foreign aggression in the first place, as well as Iran’s power projection in the region.
Yet, some in Iran may argue that diplomacy, not the bomb, offers the best path forward. Since the 7 October attack, Israel has adopted a pre-emptive approach, even at the risk of prompting larger confrontations. There is no reason to think that this will be any different in Iran.
The second path is that of a protracted war between the two nations. However, this time, Israel won’t be on the defensive, fending off attempts by Iran to surround it with increasingly potent proxies. With Iran poised to have a serious discussion on whether to dash towards a bomb, if that is at all possible, Israel simply cannot just step out of Iran’s airspace and wait to see who wins the internal debate that may shape Iran. It will feel compelled to monitor—and, if necessary, degrade—what remains of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.
Although a regime change in Iran was not in the cards for Israel, Netanyahu has long advocated for a “comprehensive” policy against Iran, aiming to target all dimensions of Iranian power—its proxies, nuclear ambitions, missile programmes, and internal institutions. This maximalist camp has opposed any sort of "compartmentalised" deal that would seek to focus solely on one aspect. This is one of the reasons why Netanyahu has always been against the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Contrary to its name, the deal was viewed as not comprehensive enough, and allowed Iran to shift focus onto other areas.
One of those major concessions includes renouncing any form of domestic enrichment capabilities—a demand that Iran had long considered a non-starter prior to the war.
The aftermath of 7 October, which saw the quasi defeat of Hezbollah, the fall of the Assad regime (one of the centerpiece of the “Axis of Resistance”), the destruction of Hamas as a cohesive military force, and has now led Israel to have air superiority over Iran, has vindicated the maximalist camp. This larger regional context is also testing the true end goals of this “maximalist camp”—a group not known for restraint when strategic opportunities emerge. What the current Israeli government may have planned isn’t a return to diplomacy, nor to put a pretty bow on the 12-day war. Rather, the war may well be the opening move in a more expansive effort, not just to dismantle Iran’s nuclear programme, but to confront and possibly neutralise the Islamic Republic altogether.
#iranisraelwar #TrumTariff #SariaEarn #ETHBreak2K

In futures trading, timing is everything. While there's no one-size-fits-all answer, here are some general insights to help you determine the best time to take a trade:

*Market Hours*
1. *Opening Range*: The first 30-60 minutes after market open (e.g., 9:30 am ET for US markets) can be volatile, with prices often setting the tone for the day.
2. *Lunch Break*: Trading activity often slows down during lunch hours (e.g., 11:30 am - 1:30 pm ET), making it a relatively quiet period.
3. *Closing Range*: The last 30-60 minutes before market close (e.g., 3:00 pm - 4:00 pm ET) can see increased volatility as traders adjust positions.

*Economic Indicators and Events*
1. *Economic Releases*: Pay attention to scheduled economic indicators, such as GDP, inflation rates, or employment numbers. Markets often react to these releases.
2. *FOMC Meetings*: Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings can impact interest rates and market sentiment.
3. *Earnings Reports*: Keep an eye on earnings reports from major companies, as they can influence market sentiment.

*Technical Analysis*
1. *Trend Identification*: Look for strong trends, using indicators like moving averages, RSI, or Bollinger Bands.
2. *Support and Resistance*: Identify key support and resistance levels, as these can be areas of increased trading activity.
3. *Chart Patterns*: Recognize chart patterns, such as triangles, wedges, or head-and-shoulders formations, which can indicate potential trading opportunities.

*Other Factors*
1. *Liquidity*: Trading during periods of high liquidity (e.g., when markets are open in both the US and Europe) can result in tighter spreads and more efficient execution.
2. *Volatility*: Be aware of market volatility, as it can impact trading decisions. High volatility can lead to increased risk, while low volatility can result in tighter ranges.
3. *News and Events*: Stay informed about market-moving news and events, such as geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, or major announcements.

*Final Thoughts*
While these factors can influence the best time to take a trade, it's essential to:

- Develop a trading strategy that suits your style and risk tolerance.
- Stay adaptable and adjust your approach as market conditions change.
- Continuously monitor and analyze market data to refine your trading decisions.

Remember, there is no single "best" time to take a trade. It's crucial to consider multiple factors and stay informed to make informed trading decisions.

Determining the best time for trading involves a combination of market analysis, technical indicators, and an understanding of market dynamics. Here are some key factors to consider:

*Market Liquidity*
1. *Overlapping Market Hours*: When major markets overlap (e.g., US and European markets), liquidity tends to increase, making it easier to enter and exit trades.
2. *High-Volume Trading Sessions*: Sessions with high trading volumes, such as the US market open, can provide more trading opportunities.

*Volatility*
1. *Economic Releases*: Trading during economic releases (e.g., GDP, inflation rates) can be beneficial due to increased volatility.
2. *Market Sentiment*: Understanding market sentiment and positioning can help identify potential trading opportunities.

*Technical Analysis*
1. *Trend Identification*: Analyzing trends using technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI) can help determine optimal trading times.
2. *Support and Resistance*: Identifying key support and resistance levels can indicate areas of increased trading activity.

*Market Participants*
1. *Institutional Traders*: Trading during times when institutional traders are active (e.g., pension funds, hedge funds) can provide more trading opportunities.
2. *Retail Traders*: Understanding retail trader behavior and sentiment can help identify potential trading opportunities.

*Backtesting and Analysis*
1. *Historical Data Analysis*: Analyzing historical market data can help identify patterns and trends that may indicate optimal trading times.
2. *Strategy Backtesting*: Backtesting trading strategies using historical data can help determine the effectiveness of different trading times.

While these factors can help determine the best time for trading, it's essential to remember that:

- Market conditions are constantly changing.
- No single approach works for all markets and trading strategies.
- Continuous monitoring and adaptation are necessary to optimize trading performance.

By considering these factors and staying informed, traders can increase the ir chances of success.

#Write2Earn! #ETHBreak2K #TrumpAtDAS #RippleVictory

#ETHbreak2k $ETH
Ethereum Price at a Crossroads: Can ETH Reclaim $2,000 or Will Bears Take Control?
Ethereum Price at a Crossroads: Can ETH Reclaim $2,000 or Will Bears Take Control?
Ethereum’s price action is consolidating below key resistance levels. Will it break the $2,000 barrier, or is further downside in store? | That's TradingNEWS
Ethereum Price Outlook: Analyzing Support Levels, Market Trends, and Key Price Movements
Ethereum (ETH-USD) has recently seen significant volatility, with its price slipping below the $2,000 mark as of March 2025. Currently trading around $1,921.61, ETH is consolidating in a well-defined range between $1,880 and $1,930. This zone has garnered increased attention from traders, especially since it has traditionally served as a pivotal support level. Given Ethereum’s historical patterns, this consolidation phase might signal either a breakout or breakdown, depending on how market participants respond to this key price zone.

Looking at the broader picture, Ethereum's market cap stands at $231.78 billion, with a trading volume of $10.55 billion in the last 24 hours. The volume has spiked by over 26% during this period, indicating heightened market participation as ETH hovers near its critical support. Despite recent bearish momentum, the growing interest and volume at these levels imply that a decisive move could be imminent, although the direction remains unclear at this stage.