Binance Square

DeFiRegulation

281 views
8 Discussing
Salma6422
--
See original
#CryptoRoundTableRemarks 📌 Top 3 remarks from the recent crypto leaders discussion session: 1. Major financial institutions are preparing to integrate digital currencies into their systems by 2026. 2. Discussion about regulating decentralized financing instead of fighting it. 3. Expansion in the use of ZK technologies within wallets and blockchain. 💬 How do you see the future of DeFi with regulation? 🔖 #CryptoRoundTableRemarks #DeFiRegulation #Web3Future #CryptoUpdates #BinanceSquare
#CryptoRoundTableRemarks

📌 Top 3 remarks from the recent crypto leaders discussion session:

1. Major financial institutions are preparing to integrate digital currencies into their systems by 2026.

2. Discussion about regulating decentralized financing instead of fighting it.

3. Expansion in the use of ZK technologies within wallets and blockchain.

💬 How do you see the future of DeFi with regulation?
🔖 #CryptoRoundTableRemarks #DeFiRegulation #Web3Future #CryptoUpdates #BinanceSquare
See original
#DeFiRegulation | Code or crime? Innovation or disguised intermediation? In the latest SEC roundtable on crypto, the debate over the responsibility of DeFi developers shook the regulatory table: 📌 Pres. Atkins: Engineers should not be held responsible for how others use their code. 📌 Hester Peirce: Code is speech protected by the First Amendment. 📌 Erik Voorhees: Smart contracts functionally surpass human regulators. 📌 Others: Decentralization ≠ anarchy. It’s *user-driven transparency. 🎯 My vision as a trader, builder, and observer of the ecosystem: 💡 1. The code is neutral, but the context is not. A smart contract can be a tool or a weapon. But blaming the builder would be like imprisoning the knife maker for someone else's crime. 💡 2. DeFi does not need to be lawless to be free. True decentralization is auditable, predictable, and without privileges. Isn’t that what regulation *should* aim for? 💡 3. Regulators must evolve… or they will be obsolete code. Regulating intermediaries is easy. But how do you regulate an autonomous contract that no one controls? The answer is not to prohibit — it is to collaborate with those who design it to make it safer, not more centralized. ⚖️ Should developers be treated as open source authors or as financial intermediaries? 👉 I vote to protect innovation and punish bad intent, not the existence of code. 💬 What do you think? Should regulation be rewritten in Solidity, or continue to be imposed from offices disconnected from the blockchain reality? 🔗 Your voice between code and law. Your broker with an empire vision. #CryptoRoundTableRemarks #BTC #ETH #TRX {spot}(BTTCUSDT) {future}(1000000BOBUSDT) {spot}(1000SATSUSDT)
#DeFiRegulation | Code or crime? Innovation or disguised intermediation?

In the latest SEC roundtable on crypto, the debate over the responsibility of DeFi developers shook the regulatory table:

📌 Pres. Atkins: Engineers should not be held responsible for how others use their code.
📌 Hester Peirce: Code is speech protected by the First Amendment.
📌 Erik Voorhees: Smart contracts functionally surpass human regulators.
📌 Others: Decentralization ≠ anarchy. It’s *user-driven transparency.

🎯 My vision as a trader, builder, and observer of the ecosystem:

💡 1. The code is neutral, but the context is not.
A smart contract can be a tool or a weapon. But blaming the builder would be like imprisoning the knife maker for someone else's crime.

💡 2. DeFi does not need to be lawless to be free.
True decentralization is auditable, predictable, and without privileges. Isn’t that what regulation *should* aim for?

💡 3. Regulators must evolve… or they will be obsolete code.
Regulating intermediaries is easy. But how do you regulate an autonomous contract that no one controls? The answer is not to prohibit — it is to collaborate with those who design it to make it safer, not more centralized.

⚖️ Should developers be treated as open source authors or as financial intermediaries?

👉 I vote to protect innovation and punish bad intent, not the existence of code.

💬 What do you think? Should regulation be rewritten in Solidity, or continue to be imposed from offices disconnected from the blockchain reality?

🔗 Your voice between code and law. Your broker with an empire vision.

#CryptoRoundTableRemarks #BTC #ETH #TRX
#SECGuidance #SECGuidance – New Rules, New Clarity The SEC just released fresh guidance impacting crypto disclosures, stablecoins, and investor compliance: Crypto issuers must now disclose smart contract code & key risks Covered stablecoins (like $USDC) may be exempt from registration if fully backed & non-yielding Accredited investor rules get more flexible under Rule 506(c) More transparency = more trust. Stay compliant. Stay informed. #CryptoCompliance #InvestorProtection #Stablecoins #SEC #DeFiRegulation
#SECGuidance
#SECGuidance – New Rules, New Clarity

The SEC just released fresh guidance impacting crypto disclosures, stablecoins, and investor compliance:

Crypto issuers must now disclose smart contract code & key risks

Covered stablecoins (like $USDC) may be exempt from registration if fully backed & non-yielding

Accredited investor rules get more flexible under Rule 506(c)

More transparency = more trust.
Stay compliant. Stay informed.

#CryptoCompliance #InvestorProtection #Stablecoins #SEC #DeFiRegulation
SEC Withdraws Appeal, Easing Regulations on DeFi Platforms ⚖️🔓 In a significant regulatory shift, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) withdrew its appeal against a Texas federal court ruling that invalidated its broker-dealer rule targeting DeFi platforms. This rule would have imposed stringent compliance requirements, including know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money-laundering (AML) regulations. The withdrawal is seen as a reprieve for the DeFi sector, potentially fostering innovation and growth without the immediate threat of heavy regulatory burdens. Conclusion: The SEC's decision to withdraw its appeal may encourage further development in the DeFi space, but it also raises questions about the future regulatory landscape and the balance between innovation and investor protection. #DeFiRegulation #SECCrypto #Cryptolaw #FinancialFreedom
SEC Withdraws Appeal, Easing Regulations on DeFi Platforms ⚖️🔓

In a significant regulatory shift, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) withdrew its appeal against a Texas federal court ruling that invalidated its broker-dealer rule targeting DeFi platforms. This rule would have imposed stringent compliance requirements, including know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money-laundering (AML) regulations. The withdrawal is seen as a reprieve for the DeFi sector, potentially fostering innovation and growth without the immediate threat of heavy regulatory burdens.

Conclusion: The SEC's decision to withdraw its appeal may encourage further development in the DeFi space, but it also raises questions about the future regulatory landscape and the balance between innovation and investor protection.

#DeFiRegulation #SECCrypto #Cryptolaw #FinancialFreedom
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number