daos

One of the most important but least glamorous topics in Web3 gaming and especially within a massive ecosystem like Yield Guild Games is security. We spend so much time talking about gameplay mechanics, token models, cross-chain expansion, creator ecosystems, and decentralized governance that it's easy to overlook the foundation that holds it all together the treasury. For any guild that manages assets across multiple chains and multiple games, the treasury is both the heart of operations and the biggest point of vulnerability. And if we’re going to talk honestly about the future of @Yield Guild Games YGG, then we need to talk honestly about mitigating hacking risks in guild treasuries, because nothing can disrupt trust or stability faster than a security breach.

Treasuries are attractive targets. Every #Web3 organization #DAOs , guilds, protocols, collectors faces the same reality if value is stored on-chain, attackers will try to exploit it. Guilds like YGG naturally draw even more attention because of their multi-asset, multi-chain, and multi-wallet structure. The treasury doesn’t just hold tokens; it holds NFTs, staking positions, vault yields, game assets, collateralized items, and sometimes even marketplace liquidity positions. That complexity creates opportunities, but it also creates risk if not handled carefully.

From my point of view inside the YGG ecosystem, one of the reasons YGG has remained resilient is because the guild treats security not as an afterthought, but as a continuous responsibility. Mitigating hacking risks is not a single action it’s a layered defense system built across three domains: technology, governance, and human behavior.

The first and most critical defense is multi-signature wallets. A guild treasury should never, under any circumstances, be controlled by a single private key. YGG, like most high-level DAOs, uses multisig arrangements that require multiple signers to authorize any transaction. This drastically reduces the risk of individual compromise. Even if a key is leaked or stolen, the treasury remains safe because no attacker can execute transactions alone.

Multi-signature systems are not perfect they introduce coordination delays and require careful management of signer turnover but the security they provide is essential. Beyond multisig, YGG also benefits from smart contract audits for any system that involves automated processes, such as reward vaults, staking contracts, or distribution methods. Smart contract risks are among the most common causes of hacks in Web3, so ensuring that every contract interacting with the treasury is audited and regularly reviewed is non-negotiable.

Another major technical layer is cold storage. Not every asset needs to sit in a hot wallet. High-value #NFTs rare in-game items, long-term token reserves, and assets not required for day-to-day operations can be stored in safer, offline environments. This reduces the attack surface dramatically. Hot wallets should be used only for operational purposes distributing rewards, running missions, or bridging assets when necessary.

The second domain, governance, is just as important. Many hacks in DAOs come not from brute-force attacks, but from governance vulnerabilities. A malicious proposal passing due to voter apathy or social engineering can drain a treasury just as fast as a smart contract exploit. This is why YGG’s governance structure emphasizes transparency, community oversight, and clear procedures for treasury-related decisions.

Risk modeling in governance means Setting strict limits on the amount that can be moved in a single transaction, Requiring community approval for high-value transfers, Using time delays (timelocks) before treasury actions execute, Ensuring emergency shutdown mechanisms exist if suspicious activity is detected.

These mechanisms transform governance from a purely democratic process into a security layer. They give the community time to react, question, and intervene if something looks off.

I think the most underestimated component of treasury security is the human factor. The reality is that most hacks aren’t purely technical they exploit people. Phishing attempts, social engineering, fake signatures, fraudulent contracts, malicious links, compromised devices the list is long. Even the best multisig system can fail if signers are tricked into approving malicious transactions.

This is why operational discipline matters. Signers need Hardware wallets, Dedicated devices, Strict communication protocols, Awareness training for phishing and social threats, Clear operational boundaries, Zero tolerance for unverified links or sudden requests.

Every major organization in Web3 that has suffered a treasury loss can often trace the cause back to a moment where human trust was exploited. YGG mitigates this risk by limiting signer access, rotating responsibilities, and fostering a culture of security awareness. #Treasury management is not informal it’s structured, documented, and verified.

Beyond internal protections, there is also the external ecosystem to consider. Because YGG interacts with multiple games and chains, each integration adds potential risk. Partner games may have vulnerabilities. Bridges can be compromised. Third-party tools can be exploited. YGG’s approach here is to never rely on a single point of trust. The guild evaluates partners carefully, diversifies across safer protocols, and avoids overexposure to any one ecosystem. Redundancy is a form of resilience.

I believe treasury protection will evolve even further. On-chain insurance protocols, automated risk monitors, AI-driven anomaly detection, and advanced social recovery tools will all play a role in safeguarding guild assets. YGG, with its scale and data access, is well positioned to adopt these innovations early.

Mitigating hacking risks in guild treasuries is not about fear it’s about responsibility. The treasury represents the collective contributions, achievements, and trust of thousands of players worldwide. Protecting it means protecting the guild’s future, its mission, and the community that depends on it.

Security is not just a technical requirement for YGG. It’s a commitment to every member who believes in the guild’s vision. And that commitment must remain as strong as the guild itself.

@Yield Guild Games
#YGGPlay
$YGG

One of the most fascinating aspects of Web3 is how easily it breaks the rules of traditional industries. In most sectors, competitors don’t talk to each other, let alone collaborate. Companies guard their strategies, protect their user bases, and fight for market share. But in the world of decentralized gaming, something different happened DAOs supposedly competing for players, assets, and attention started working together. No organization embraced this cooperative mindset more consistently than @Yield Guild Games .

When you think of gaming DAOs, it’s natural to imagine them competing. After all, guilds share the same broad mission acquire assets, empower players, grow communities, and build influence within games. But the Web3 landscape is too vast, too complex, and too interconnected for any single guild to dominate it alone. Unlike Web2 gaming, where studios create walled gardens, Web3 games exist across chains, ecosystems, and networks that overlap constantly. That overlapping structure naturally pushes DAOs toward collaboration rather than isolation.

YGG understood early that cooperation is not a sign of weakness it’s a survival advantage. Instead of trying to monopolize the entire GameFi ecosystem, YGG began forming alliances with other guilds and #DAOs to strengthen collective infrastructure. The result was a growing network where resources could be shared, best practices could be exchanged, and communities could cross-pollinate.

Consider asset liquidity. Some games thrive during specific seasons or meta changes. When a guild has underutilized assets, partnering with another DAO to lend, borrow, or trade those items keeps economic activity healthy across the board. This benefits players, developers, and guilds simultaneously. Rather than assets sitting idle in wallets, they continue generating value through shared networks. YGG’s collaborative approach has allowed it to move resources efficiently without relying on centralized exchanges or risky marketplace speculation.

Cooperation also shows up in player development. Guilds host joint training sessions, scrimmages, and community events where players from different DAOs sharpen their skills together. In traditional gaming, rival clans or teams almost never collaborate. But in Web3, where success relies on understanding complex token economies, skill progression, and evolving metas, sharing knowledge strengthens the entire ecosystem. YGG frequently collaborates in these education-driven initiatives, treating other DAOs not as opponents but as co-builders of a larger ecosystem.

Another area where DAOs benefit from cooperation is governance. As more games adopt decentralized structures, guilds often vote on similar proposals. Instead of voting blindly or defensively, DAOs can coordinate to push for shared improvements like sustainable tokenomics, fair launch structures, robust reward sinks, and healthier earning systems. YGG’s influence in these governance conversations helps elevate standards not just for itself, but for players across multiple guilds.

Even in competitive situations, cooperation emerges. For example, tournaments or leaderboard races often see guilds battling for rank. But behind the scenes, organizers, guild managers, and community leads exchange insights on how to structure events, onboard newcomers, and maintain fairness. This unified back-end support ensures that events serve the broader ecosystem rather than becoming isolated arms races.

What makes this collaboration possible is the understanding that Web3 isn’t a zero-sum game. A stronger GameFi ecosystem benefits everyone. If one game succeeds, it brings more players into the space. If a guild builds effective training infrastructure, other DAOs can adopt and improve it. If a governance decision stabilizes a game economy, all players benefit. YGG’s role has often been that of the convener—bringing DAOs together, building bridges, and reinforcing cooperation as a core cultural principle.

This cooperative spirit is one of the clearest signs that Web3 gaming is evolving past the noise of early speculation. Instead of guilds fighting over a shrinking pie, they are working together to grow the entire economy. And as the ecosystem matures, these alliances will only become more important.

I think in a world where traditional companies compete fiercely and isolate themselves, gaming DAOs are proving something radical collaboration can be a competitive advantage, and YGG is helping lead the way.
@Yield Guild Games
#YGGPlay
$YGG

Every time I think I've got Yield Guild Games filed away into some simple category, it refuses to stay there. YGG isn't just a gaming DAO, or an NFT collective, or a Web3 experiment — it feels like part of a much older human story.

The more I think about it, the more YGG doesn't feel like a crypto innovation to me, but an extension of the kinds of cooperatives that have sustained humanity since forever.

It is both profoundly old and at the same time profoundly new.

Guilds once trained workers, shared resources, protected knowledge, and built identity. Today, YGG does this, but inside digital worlds where labor, value, and culture have become programmable. Instead of tools, we have NFTs. Instead of workshops, we have virtual economies. Instead of city councils, we have DAO governance.

And that parallel hits deep on a personal level with me.

It proves that human coordination does not disappear when environments change-it evolves.

Thus, as value migrates from the physical to the virtual economy, players become digital workers whose creativity and time generate real-world economic output. For the first time, NFTs grant the digital laborer true ownership over that output. And YGG becomes the coordinator of that shift, empowering thousands of players across a network of SubDAOs that feel more like digital city-states than gaming communities.

These SubDAOs have their own identity, treasury, rules, culture — just as the medieval guild cities did. People align not by geography, but by shared purpose. That alone feels like a preview of how digital nations may form in the decades ahead.

What moves me most is how YGG recognizes play as labor and labor as play — restoring dignity to skills which society once dismissed as “just gaming.” It is through governance, ownership, and collective decision-making that players finally get a say in the worlds they live in.

In many ways, YGG is not a project.

It's a mirror to the next phase of human collaboration: beyond borders, beyond physical limits, and beyond traditional institutions. If the ancient world built with stone and metal, the modern world builds with code and imagination. And at the epicenter of that transition is YGG, proving that cooperation, co-ownership, and shared prosperity are not artifacts from the past but the bedrock of our future. Yield Guild Games is not simply the evolution of gaming. It's the evolution of us. @Yield Guild Games #YGGPlay #Web3 #DAOs $YGG

Whenever people romanticize the future of gaming DAOs, they talk about decentralization, community ownership, and player-driven economies. But the moment you start scaling beyond a small circle of enthusiasts, reality hits you in the face regulators are watching, and they are trying to figure out what exactly a gaming DAO even is. If you have been following @Yield Guild Games YGG’s journey closely, you have probably noticed how carefully and deliberately they had to navigate this regulatory maze.

The problem starts with definitions. Regulators love definitions because they determine how something should be taxed, governed, or controlled. But gaming DAOs do not fit neatly into any traditional category. Are they investment groups because they collectively purchase NFTs? Are they gaming communities? Are they crowdfunding pools? Are their tokens securities? No regulator has a straight answer, and that ambiguity creates friction for growth.

Take the issue of token classification. If a DAO issues a token, and that token can be interpreted as promising financial upside related to DAO activities, that’s when the security alarm starts ringing. Most DAOs learned this the hard way. But YGG took a more careful route early on positioning its token around governance, access, and ecosystem utility rather than profit expectations. It’s not perfect, but it keeps them on the safer side of current regulatory language.

Where things get even more complicated is treasury management. Gaming #DAOs often pool funds to buy assets NFTs, tokens from partner games, and sometimes even land in virtual worlds. That sounds harmless in Web3 culture, but from a regulatory perspective, it can look like fund management activity. Fund management usually requires licensing, reporting, compliance checks, and operational transparency. DAOs, traditionally, excel at transparency but not at structured compliance.

YGG’s unique approach has been to decentralize the ecosystem into regional entities YGG SEA, YGG Japan, YGG Pilipinas each functioning within local legal frameworks. It’s not decentralization in the ideological Web3 sense, but it’s decentralization in the regulatory sense. It allows them to be compliant in multiple jurisdictions while maintaining a broader, global DAO identity.

Another major issue is #kyc . The Web3 community hates it. Regulators love it. And gaming DAOs, especially those distributing rewards, find themselves stuck in the middle. If a DAO issues tokens or distributes earnings from participating in games, regulators may require identification to prevent money laundering or tax evasion. YGG eventually introduced stricter KYC requirements for certain reward programs—not because it's anti-Web3, but because it’s the only way to operate legally at scale.

Then there’s the question nobody wants to answer Is play-to-earn considered income? In some countries, the answer is yes taxable income. In others, it’s treated as capital gains. In some places, it’s still a regulatory black hole. During the P2E boom, governments were caught off-guard, and guilds suddenly found themselves responsible for helping players understand complex tax implications. YGG took a hands-off, educational stance, providing guidance without assuming legal liability for individual users smart, but still something most DAOs weren’t prepared to handle.

When scholars played for guilds like YGG, were they workers? Contractors? Contributors? Regulators in some countries raised this question during the height of Axie Infinity’s popularity. YGG avoided the biggest regulatory storm by emphasizing that players maintain control and choice, rather than being contracted labor.

We can’t talk about challenges without addressing decentralization itself. Regulators prefer accountability someone to call, someone to fine, someone to hold responsible. DAOs, by design, blur that responsibility. YGG’s hybrid model, where governance is decentralized but operations are supported by recognizable legal structures, is probably the only sustainable route until regulators catch up.

In the end, gaming DAOs live in a gray zone too innovative for existing laws, but too big to ignore. YGG’s story shows that surviving in this space requires more than decentralization ideology. It requires adaptability, legal awareness, and a willingness to build bridges between Web3 culture and real-world regulations.

To be honest if gaming DAOs want to last, this is the model they will have to follow.
@Yield Guild Games
#YGGPlay
$YGG

When you look at where DeFi is heading, one thing becomes clear the future belongs to infrastructure that can scale, simplify, and standardize how liquidity moves across the entire ecosystem. DeFi doesn’t need more complex protocols layered on top of each other like a Jenga tower it needs cleaner foundations. This is exactly where @Morpho Labs 🦋 steps in, not as another money market competing for liquidity, but as the underlying engine that future money markets, vaults, and strategies will build on.

Calling Morpho an infrastructure layer isn’t just a catchy phrase. It’s a literal description of what it’s becoming. Morpho Blue’s modular, isolated market design makes it the base layer for a whole new generation of on-chain credit products. It doesn’t dictate how lending should work it provides the raw building blocks so developers, institutions, and automated strategies can create markets that fit their exact needs. This alone puts Morpho in a completely different category than the monolithic protocols that came before it.

Think about how Ethereum didn’t try to be every application. It simply provided the foundation. Over time, everything DEXs, NFTs, lending markets, derivatives emerged on top of it. Morpho is positioning itself the same way a neutral layer that powers specialized lending markets without forcing anyone into predefined structures. The protocol is lightweight, efficient, and standardized, which is precisely why so many builders are gravitating toward it.

This modularity also unlocks something DeFi has been struggling with for years: true permissionless innovation. On legacy money markets, adding a new asset or changing a parameter requires governance drama, risk committee approvals, and long forum discussions. That model simply cannot support the speed and diversity of modern DeFi. Morpho flips the script anyone can deploy a market instantly. No #DAOs to convince, no bottlenecks, no limitations. It’s DeFi the way it was meant to be open, flexible, and fast.

Being an infrastructure layer also means Morpho benefits from ecosystem growth without needing to compete for users directly. As more builders launch vaults, liquidity routers, institutional grade credit products, or experimental lending structures on Blue, they all rely on Morpho as the underlying settlement layer. The more the ecosystem expands, the more indispensable Morpho becomes. It’s a flywheel powered by adoption, not emissions.

Another reason Morpho serves as the ideal infrastructure layer is risk isolation. Traditional money markets bundle risk into giant shared pools. Morpho separates everything into isolated compartments, ensuring a bad asset can’t contaminate an entire system. This is essential for institutions, which require predictable, compartmentalized exposure before they can operate at scale. The safer the foundation, the more capital it can support.

Morpho’s infrastructure approach is future-proof. The protocol doesn’t need to guess what the next big DeFi trend will be RWAs, stablecoins, L2-native assets, institutional credit, or automated markets. It simply provides the building blocks. Whatever the industry demands next, builders can create it on Morpho without waiting for protocol-level upgrades.

Morpho isn’t just part of the DeFi landscape it’s becoming the ground everything else can stand on.

@Morpho Labs 🦋
#Morpho
$MORPHO

Ever tried borrowing crypto without collateral? It's like walking a tightrope – exhilarating, but one wrong step and poof! Wildcat's new Ethereum launch aims to make this less of a gamble, especially for the big players. Think funds, market makers, and #DAOs – not your average Joe (or Jane) just yet. They're tackling the undercollateralized lending problem, which has been a major pain point in #crypto .

In simple words
Wildcat lets borrowers set up fixed-rate, on-chain credit. No more nail-biting over fluctuating interest rates!
Wildcat aims to solve the pesky problem of undercollateralized lending in crypto. Think of it like this: you want to borrow some crypto, but you don't want to lock up a ton of your other assets as collateral. Wildcat lets borrowers (primarily institutions, funds, market makers and DAOs for now – not your average Joe just yet) establish fixed-rate, on-chain credit facilities. This is a big deal because it brings more stability and predictability to the often-volatile world of DeFi lending. Though tt's not going to solve all the market's problems overnight, but it does offer a more structured approach.
But here's the real question: Will Wildcat become the king of the decentralized lending jungle, or will it just be another house cat in the crowded DeFi litter box? What do YOU think? Is this the next big thing in crypto lending, or just another flash in the pan? Let's discuss in the comments!
#defi #CryptoLoans

#2025WithBinance
I Wish this $BTC

& $ETH


makes some noise sooner.

In crypto hype moves fast. Memecoins rise and collapse. Narratives flash and fade. But the real breakthroughs often come from projects that build quietly and focus on foundations that can last.
@KernelDAO is one of those builders.
Rather than chasing short term trends KernelDAO is creating the operating system for DAOs. It is developing the coordination stack that decentralized communities need to govern organize and grow. This includes modular governance frameworks contributor incentives and on chain coordination tools.
The $KERNEL token powers this ecosystem. It is not only a tradable asset. It drives governance staking contributor rewards and reputation. Each token represents active participation and growth which gives $KERNEL utility beyond speculation.

The market is starting to notice. $KERNEL has climbed from a base near $0.09 to around $0.22 today. Market cap is about $53.7M with a circulating supply of 236M out of 1B. Daily volume has surged past $73M showing strong liquidity and fresh capital entering. This is not noise. It is accumulation.
KernelDAO is still early. Documentation onboarding and UX can improve. But the foundation is live and already shipping which places it ahead of most projects in its category.
In a market full of hype KernelDAO is not following the meta
It is building the meta 🚀
#KernelDAO #DeFi #DAOs

📅 July 31 | Washington, D.C., USA
In a move that could redefine crypto gaming in the United States, the new SEC Chairman, Hester Atkins, officially announced the launch of “Project Crypto,” an initiative aimed at modernizing the rules governing digital assets, with a special focus on on-chain projects.
Yes, the same SEC that for years sowed confusion and fear in the ecosystem now seems to be showing signs of openness… or more sophisticated oversight?
🔍 What is “Project Crypto” and why does it matter so much?
During a private conference with legislators, startups, and regulators, Atkins explained that the goal of “Project Crypto” is to update the existing regulatory structure for digital assets, recognizing that the current framework “was not designed for decentralized environments, nor for mechanisms like DAOs, programmable tokens, or validators.”
The focus will be on four main areas:
1. Clearer legal definitions to distinguish between utility tokens, securities, and stablecoins.
2. Automated disclosure mechanisms tailored to on-chain projects.
3. Specific rules for DAOs and validators, including fiduciary responsibility issues.
4. A permanent regulatory sandbox, where developers can operate with oversight and flexibility while scaling.
According to Atkins, the project does not seek to impose a traditional regulatory burden, but rather to work with the ecosystem to adapt compliance to new technological realities. To this end, he has enlisted legal teams from Coinbase, a16z, Avalanche, and Polygon as technical advisors for the process.
The announcement comes amid growing political pressure from Congress and the White House, which in recent weeks have shown a more proactive stance on comprehensive crypto regulation, driven by concerns about tax evasion, market manipulation, and consumer protection.
Topic Opinion:
"Project Crypto" is the SEC's first real attempt to leave behind its villainous role in the crypto industry and assume a more technical, collaborative, and, above all, up-to-date role.
Of course, there is skepticism (and rightfully so). Years of regulation through fear aren't erased with a statement. But if this project truly listens to the ecosystem and allows for the creation of clear rules without killing innovation, it could be a turning point for the development of legally viable on-chain infrastructure in the US.
💬 Do you believe in "Project Crypto" as a solution, or does it sound more like another attempt at control?
#SEC #CryptoRegulationBattle #Onchain #DAOs #CryptoNews $BTC

In #today fast-evolving Web3 ecosystem, users face a fragmented experience when interacting with decentralized applications. From multiple browser extensions to countless mobile apps, navigating DeFi, NFTs, and #DAOs can feel overwhelming. This complexity not only slows adoption but also discourages newcomers who want simple and secure access. @WalletConnect was created to solve this challenge, offering an open-source protocol that connects wallets and dApps effortlessly across blockchains, devices, and platforms. By focusing on universal connectivity rather than creating another wallet, WalletConnect has established itself as the backbone of interoperability in Web3.
The vision of WalletConnect is built on a core principle: providing a unified standard for wallet-to-dApp communication. Instead of relying on centralized intermediaries, the protocol ensures user sovereignty by keeping private keys fully under user control. Its blockchain-agnostic design allows seamless multi-chain interaction, while security and privacy remain uncompromised, as sensitive data never passes through WalletConnect servers. This commitment to openness and scalability makes it a true enabler for the decentralized future.
WalletConnect’s technology architecture is modular and robust. At its foundation is the Session Protocol, establishing end-to-end encrypted communication channels between wallets and dApps. The Relay Network, powered by decentralized servers, only routes messages without storing data, ensuring high redundancy and resilience. The Modal UI Kit makes developer integration simple, supporting QR codes, deep links, and push notifications with minimal code. Finally, the Namespace System defines chain, account, and permissions for each session, providing precise multi-chain support. This architecture ensures flexibility, reliability, and scalability for developers and users alike.
The significance of WalletConnect is best understood through comparison. Without it, every dApp must manually integrate with each wallet, creating high costs and inconsistent user experiences. New wallets struggle to gain traction, as they must negotiate individual integrations. With WalletConnect, dApps integrate once and instantly connect to hundreds of wallets, while users enjoy a seamless and secure journey across platforms. Developers can focus on improving functionality instead of building redundant integrations, and wallet creators can bring products to market faster.
Fueling this ecosystem is the $WCT token, which empowers decentralization and growth. WCT provides governance rights, allowing holders to vote on protocol upgrades, relay network parameters, and security changes. It incentivizes relay node operators, rewarding them for reliability and bandwidth contribution. A development funding pool, powered by WCT grants, supports integrations and ecosystem expansion. Additionally, premium services such as advanced relay privacy features can be accessed using WCT. Together, these utilities ensure that $WCT is not just a token but the economic engine behind #WalletConnect sustainability.
The real-world applications of WalletConnect span across industries. For DeFi users, it allows cross-platform logins, enabling access to dApps on desktop with mobile wallets—no browser extension required. Developers can enable multi-chain support with a single integration, covering Ethereum, Polygon, Solana, Cosmos, and more. In gaming and NFTs, WalletConnect provides instant wallet connections and smooth asset transfers, enhancing user experience. Enterprises can also leverage WalletConnect to integrate blockchain without forcing employees or clients to adopt specific wallets, making it a versatile standard for both consumer and business use cases.
When compared with competitors, WalletConnect’s strengths become clear. While MetaMask SDK serves only MetaMask and RainbowKit focuses mainly on Ethereum, WalletConnect supports over 300 wallets across multiple chains. Privy emphasizes Web3 login but lacks deep wallet connectivity. In contrast, WalletConnect combines wallet-agnostic design, native multi-chain compatibility, and a community-driven open-source approach, making it the most comprehensive solution in the market.
Challenges remain as the protocol evolves. The relay system is not yet fully decentralized, presenting a temporary centralization risk. As the primary connection layer, WalletConnect could become a prime target for attackers, requiring constant security improvements. Fragmentation risk exists if competing standards divide the developer community, and commercialization—such as charging fees for premium services—must be balanced carefully to avoid alienating open-source supporters.
Looking ahead, WalletConnect has immense strategic opportunities. It could expand into secure messaging, becoming the default communication layer for Web3 wallets. Integrating zero-knowledge (ZK) identity proofs would add enhanced privacy and verification. The protocol could extend to IoT and AR/VR devices, enabling wallets to interact with smart cars, gaming hardware, or even wearables. For enterprises, WalletConnect could provide SDKs tailored for corporate blockchain adoption, further broadening its reach.
The future of WalletConnect is promising. Already the most popular connection standard in Web3, the next step is evolving into a fully decentralized and economically sustainable protocol governed by its community. With the support of #WalletConnect and powered by $WCT , the project is well on its way to unifying Web3’s fragmented landscape into a seamless, user-friendly ecosystem. By solving the hardest challenge of blockchain—connectivity—@WalletConnect is positioning itself as the universal bridge of the decentralized internet.
♡𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞💬 ➤ @WalletConnect #WalletConnect $WCT