BlockchainRisks
4,074 views
7 Discussing
Hot
Latest
💥ALERT: In May 2025, crypto losses hit $302M, with $229M from code vulnerabilities—a massive 4,483% spike from April.
Phishing attacks led to $47.6M in losses, underscoring the persistent danger of social engineering targeting people over technology.
#CryptoSecurity #BlockchainRisks #PhishingAlert #CyberThreats #MyCOSTrade
Phishing attacks led to $47.6M in losses, underscoring the persistent danger of social engineering targeting people over technology.
#CryptoSecurity #BlockchainRisks #PhishingAlert #CyberThreats #MyCOSTrade
See original
Researcher Drake Warns Bitcoin Owners of Disaster
Cybersecurity expert Justin Drake, who works at the Ethereum Foundation, warned Bitcoin owners of a serious threat in 2025. According to his estimates, a 51% attack on the Bitcoin blockchain could cost $10 billion and require 10 GW of power for mining. This is only 0.5% of Bitcoin's market capitalization ($2 trillion), making the network vulnerable. In the event of a successful attack, losses could reach $260 billion, including the collapse of Bitcoin ETFs, mining company stocks, and futures contracts.
The collapse of Mantra’s $OM token highlights the growing influence and risks of wallet intelligence — real-time blockchain analysis used to track transactions and behaviors. While it offers strategic advantages and aids compliance, it also threatens user privacy and can be exploited. OM’s crash, driven by suspected manipulation and centralized holdings, echoes past failures like FTX, where early signs emerged from on-chain data, not regulators.
#WalletIntel #CryptoCrash #BlockchainRisks #DeFiTransparency
#WalletIntel #CryptoCrash #BlockchainRisks #DeFiTransparency
See original
Another attack in the DeFi sector resulted in a loss of US$$ 50 million in tokens, reigniting the debate on security in smart contracts. While decentralized protocols offer innovation and financial freedom, frequent hacks raise doubts about the maturity of the sector. Does the industry need more audits and regulation to prevent these attacks? How can investors protect themselves from these vulnerabilities? Share your thoughts!
#DeFiSecurity #BlockchainRisks
#DeFiSecurity #BlockchainRisks
😱🚀𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲 𝐀𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐬: 𝐀 𝐂𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐲
𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲🎉💸
Imagine the thrill of recovering access to a Bitcoin wallet after a decade—only to experience the devastating loss of funds within minutes. That’s exactly what happened to a crypto investor who finally remembered the password to their long-lost BTC wallet. Because they had held Bitcoin for so long, they also owned its forked versions, Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and eCash (XEC). Excited to consolidate their assets, they transferred XEC from Electrum ABC to Binance, unaware that they were about to fall victim to a replay attack.
To their horror, just ten minutes after the XEC transaction was completed, they discovered that their BCH balance had been completely drained. How did this happen? When a blockchain undergoes a hard fork, both the original and forked chains retain identical transaction histories up to the point of separation. If proper replay protection isn’t in place, transactions made on one chain can be unintentionally duplicated on the other. In this case, the exact same transaction—including the amount, fee, and hash—was unknowingly broadcast on the BCH network, sending their BCH to an unintended recipient. Unfortunately, Binance’s support team confirmed that the recipient address was beyond their control, meaning the lost funds were irretrievable.
This painful experience serves as a crucial warning for all crypto investors: be vigilant when handling assets across forked blockchains. Always verify whether replay protection mechanisms are in place before initiating transactions. Failing to do so can lead to irreversible losses, as demonstrated by this unfortunate event. The crypto space offers great opportunities, but without the right precautions, even experienced holders can fall victim to unforeseen risks. Stay informed, stay secure, and never underestimate the dangers of replay attacks.
#CryptoSecurity #BlockchainRisks #BitcoinFork #StayProtected $BTC
Imagine the thrill of recovering access to a Bitcoin wallet after a decade—only to experience the devastating loss of funds within minutes. That’s exactly what happened to a crypto investor who finally remembered the password to their long-lost BTC wallet. Because they had held Bitcoin for so long, they also owned its forked versions, Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and eCash (XEC). Excited to consolidate their assets, they transferred XEC from Electrum ABC to Binance, unaware that they were about to fall victim to a replay attack.
To their horror, just ten minutes after the XEC transaction was completed, they discovered that their BCH balance had been completely drained. How did this happen? When a blockchain undergoes a hard fork, both the original and forked chains retain identical transaction histories up to the point of separation. If proper replay protection isn’t in place, transactions made on one chain can be unintentionally duplicated on the other. In this case, the exact same transaction—including the amount, fee, and hash—was unknowingly broadcast on the BCH network, sending their BCH to an unintended recipient. Unfortunately, Binance’s support team confirmed that the recipient address was beyond their control, meaning the lost funds were irretrievable.
This painful experience serves as a crucial warning for all crypto investors: be vigilant when handling assets across forked blockchains. Always verify whether replay protection mechanisms are in place before initiating transactions. Failing to do so can lead to irreversible losses, as demonstrated by this unfortunate event. The crypto space offers great opportunities, but without the right precautions, even experienced holders can fall victim to unforeseen risks. Stay informed, stay secure, and never underestimate the dangers of replay attacks.
#CryptoSecurity #BlockchainRisks #BitcoinFork #StayProtected $BTC
Cross-Chain Bridges: The Overlooked Risk in DeFi
Cross-chain bridges make it easier to move assets across blockchains—but they’re also prime targets for hackers.
🔍 Real Case:
The Nomad Bridge was hacked for $190 million due to a validation bug in 2022. The attack exploited a simple logic flaw that affected hundreds of users in minutes.
📌 3 Questions Before Using Any Bridge:
1. Has it been audited? Always check for security reports.
2. Is the liquidity pool trusted and active?
3. Any past exploits? Search platforms like CVE or security bulletins.
🛡️ Cross-chain activity is powerful but comes with risks. Make sure you do your homework before transferring assets across chains.
💬 Have you ever used a cross-chain bridge? Share your experience in the comments below!
#CrossChain #bridgesecurity #DeFi #BlockchainRisks #BinanceFeed
$ETH $BNB
Cross-chain bridges make it easier to move assets across blockchains—but they’re also prime targets for hackers.
🔍 Real Case:
The Nomad Bridge was hacked for $190 million due to a validation bug in 2022. The attack exploited a simple logic flaw that affected hundreds of users in minutes.
📌 3 Questions Before Using Any Bridge:
1. Has it been audited? Always check for security reports.
2. Is the liquidity pool trusted and active?
3. Any past exploits? Search platforms like CVE or security bulletins.
🛡️ Cross-chain activity is powerful but comes with risks. Make sure you do your homework before transferring assets across chains.
💬 Have you ever used a cross-chain bridge? Share your experience in the comments below!
#CrossChain #bridgesecurity #DeFi #BlockchainRisks #BinanceFeed
$ETH $BNB
#AiXBTSecurityBreach
A hacker accessed AiXBT's secure dashboard, queuing malicious transactions that exploited the bot's autonomous response system. In response, developers migrated servers, changed access keys, and reported the hacker's address to centralized exchanges. This incident underscores the vulnerabilities in automated trading systems and the need for robust security measures in the crypto space. #AiXBTSecurityBreach #CryptoSecurity #BlockchainRisks #AIXBT
A hacker accessed AiXBT's secure dashboard, queuing malicious transactions that exploited the bot's autonomous response system. In response, developers migrated servers, changed access keys, and reported the hacker's address to centralized exchanges. This incident underscores the vulnerabilities in automated trading systems and the need for robust security measures in the crypto space. #AiXBTSecurityBreach #CryptoSecurity #BlockchainRisks #AIXBT
Login to explore more contents