Binance Square

BigDrop

53,442 views
40 Discussing
MuhammadSudaisKhan
--
Bearish
Fiboo CDMA:
The whales are preparing their buy orders... 94500k
--
Bearish
#BigDrop 10% more drop coming 📊 Worse day's ... But it's truth . 😑😑😑
#BigDrop
10% more drop coming 📊
Worse day's ... But it's truth .
😑😑😑
😳Private Equity Firms Eye Trillions in Retirement Funds You should to must look this. #Bigmove Private equity giants, including Blackstone and Apollo, are lobbying for regulatory changes to access the vast pool of U.S. retirement savings, particularly 401(k) plans. Their goal is to allow these funds to invest in unlisted assets such as leveraged buyouts and private loans, potentially granting them asset access comparable to that of sovereign wealth funds and pensions. Financial Times * Deregulation Efforts: These firms are advocating for policy shifts that would permit individual retirement accounts to include private equity investments, traditionally limited to institutional investors. * Potential Benefits: Proponents argue that this move could diversify retirement portfolios and enhance returns by tapping into high-growth private markets. * Concerns Raised: Critics caution about the suitability of such investments for individual savers, citing higher risks, fees, and the illiquid nature of private equity assets. Implications for Traders and Investors: * Market Dynamics: If successful, this shift could channel trillions of dollars into private markets, potentially driving valuations and influencing public market dynamics. * Investment Strategies: Traders may need to reassess strategies, considering the increased flow of capital into private equity and its impact on market liquidity and competition. * Regulatory Landscape: Ongoing debates and decisions regarding this proposal could introduce new regulatory considerations for financial advisors and individual investors. #BigDrop #BIGTIME/USDT
😳Private Equity Firms Eye Trillions in Retirement Funds

You should to must look this.
#Bigmove
Private equity giants, including Blackstone and Apollo, are lobbying for regulatory changes to access the vast pool of U.S. retirement savings, particularly 401(k) plans. Their goal is to allow these funds to invest in unlisted assets such as leveraged buyouts and private loans, potentially granting them asset access comparable to that of sovereign wealth funds and pensions. Financial Times

* Deregulation Efforts: These firms are advocating for policy shifts that would permit individual retirement accounts to include private equity investments, traditionally limited to institutional investors.

* Potential Benefits: Proponents argue that this move could diversify retirement portfolios and enhance returns by tapping into high-growth private markets.

* Concerns Raised: Critics caution about the suitability of such investments for individual savers, citing higher risks, fees, and the illiquid nature of private equity assets.

Implications for Traders and Investors:

* Market Dynamics: If successful, this shift could channel trillions of dollars into private markets, potentially driving valuations and influencing public market dynamics.

* Investment Strategies: Traders may need to reassess strategies, considering the increased flow of capital into private equity and its impact on market liquidity and competition.

* Regulatory Landscape: Ongoing debates and decisions regarding this proposal could introduce new regulatory considerations for financial advisors and individual investors.

#BigDrop #BIGTIME/USDT
Cripto analysisI still think about the QQQ and BTC ETF comparison a lot, even though I keep wanting to see some type of divergence. But rather than diverge, they continue to present similarities. I see a lot of people screaming that it's the golden age of crypto but Bitcoin has basically done nothing but go down since January 20th (inauguration day). QQQ topped 54 weeks after its ETF launched in 1999. And so far BTC topped 54 weeks after its ETF launched in 2024. It just so happened that week 54 was inauguration day. What are the chances that the market priced in perfection on January 20th? It turns out that a big part of "deregulation" was just presidents and celebrities having the green light to launch their own #Memecoins🤑🤑 , sucking liquidity away from retail investors. A lot of gurus fleeced retail into believing this was a "memecoin supercycle" while almost all of the memecoins launched just went to zero all while BTC dominance trended from 38% to 64%. So many retail investors would have been better off just buying BTC in 2023/2024 than losing their money in the altcoin casino. The most likely path for BTC dominance remains higher until quantitative tightening is over. In the 1970s, a period filled with rising inflation and unemployment, we had 2 left-translated cycles where the peaks of the market occurred right around the change in administrations. I'm not saying that this has to be a left-translated cycle (as long as #BTC stays above the 2024 high, then there is always a chance that the cycle can continue like it did in 2017 after BTC tested the 2016 high), but I also have to imagine that what we are experiencing right now is exactly what a left-translated cycle would feel like. Basically a #BigDrop in Q1 2025, a countertrend rally by BTC/USD in Q2/Q3 where most ALT/BTC pairs bleed, and then a drop in Q4 2025, leading to a 2026 recession. The unclear part is if there is a countertrend rally in Q2/Q3, can BTC achieve a new high? My guess is if BTC goes <$70k in the coming weeks, then a future rally will resolve to a lower high. If BTC stays >$70k, then a future rally could still resolve to a higher high. As I mentioned in other posts, there is typically a risk-off period between Feb OPEX and March OPEX so nothing is set in stone yet. Risk assets are normally weak around this time. The window of weakness is still open for a few more weeks, but if BTC goes <$70k during the next few weeks, then the odds of a left-translated cycle increase dramatically in my opinion. The calls for an imminent "Alt Season" are making their usual rounds again, while others call those that even consider the downside risk "idiots." It seems like now the only thing the industry cares about is figuring out how to get the US government to buy more Bitcoin. The repetitive headlines get kind of exhausting. As an industry, is this really what we focus on now? Imagine telling Satoshi that all Bitcoiners would care about in 2024/2025 was ETFs and government-owned Bitcoin. Do you think that would have aligned with his original vision? What happened to the feeling I had about crypto 10 years ago? It was exciting seeing all the innovation and curiosity so many of us had as to how crypto may change the world. You may say that ETFs and Strategic Reserves are changing the world. But they are not changing the world in the way many of us imagined. Sure, they are getting crypto in front of more people, but that does not necessarily improve the lives of everyday people. How do we actually integrate crypto into peoples' lives? Just talking about ETFs and strategic reserves does not feel like the right answer to me. But deep down most people know that both ETFs and Strategic Reserves are antithetical to Bitcoin, but they choose to ignore it because the focus of this cycle has mostly been about "How can we get more people to buy Bitcoin" rather than... "How can we change the world with Bitcoin?" How does Bitcoin sitting in a government wallet improve Bitcoin? As someone who has been on the Bitcoin dominance train for the last few years, I still think dominance will go higher in the coming months. But in my opinion this cycle has focused on all the wrong things (memecoins, ETFs, and strategic reserves). Obviously questioning the main narratives of this cycle will likely draw criticism, but it always make sense to question the things that the masses treat as "obviously good." After all, I think many people would have laughed if you told them crypto would basically be down only for a while after January 20th. Regardless of what awaits the cryptoverse for the rest of 2025 and 2026, I hope that next cycle we can get back to what made crypto so great in the first place. #BTC #ETH #bnb Collected from -Benjamin Cowen. $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT) $ETH {spot}(ETHUSDT) $BNB {spot}(BNBUSDT)

Cripto analysis

I still think about the QQQ and BTC ETF comparison a lot, even though I keep wanting to see some type of divergence. But rather than diverge, they continue to present similarities.
I see a lot of people screaming that it's the golden age of crypto but Bitcoin has basically done nothing but go down since January 20th (inauguration day).
QQQ topped 54 weeks after its ETF launched in 1999.
And so far BTC topped 54 weeks after its ETF launched in 2024.
It just so happened that week 54 was inauguration day.
What are the chances that the market priced in perfection on January 20th?
It turns out that a big part of "deregulation" was just presidents and celebrities having the green light to launch their own #Memecoins🤑🤑 , sucking liquidity away from retail investors.
A lot of gurus fleeced retail into believing this was a "memecoin supercycle" while almost all of the memecoins launched just went to zero all while BTC dominance trended from 38% to 64%. So many retail investors would have been better off just buying BTC in 2023/2024 than losing their money in the altcoin casino.
The most likely path for BTC dominance remains higher until quantitative tightening is over.
In the 1970s, a period filled with rising inflation and unemployment, we had 2 left-translated cycles where the peaks of the market occurred right around the change in administrations.
I'm not saying that this has to be a left-translated cycle (as long as #BTC stays above the 2024 high, then there is always a chance that the cycle can continue like it did in 2017 after BTC tested the 2016 high), but I also have to imagine that what we are experiencing right now is exactly what a left-translated cycle would feel like.
Basically a #BigDrop in Q1 2025, a countertrend rally by BTC/USD in Q2/Q3 where most ALT/BTC pairs bleed, and then a drop in Q4 2025, leading to a 2026 recession. The unclear part is if there is a countertrend rally in Q2/Q3, can BTC achieve a new high?
My guess is if BTC goes <$70k in the coming weeks, then a future rally will resolve to a lower high.
If BTC stays >$70k, then a future rally could still resolve to a higher high.
As I mentioned in other posts, there is typically a risk-off period between Feb OPEX and March OPEX so nothing is set in stone yet. Risk assets are normally weak around this time. The window of weakness is still open for a few more weeks, but if BTC goes <$70k during the next few weeks, then the odds of a left-translated cycle increase dramatically in my opinion.
The calls for an imminent "Alt Season" are making their usual rounds again, while others call those that even consider the downside risk "idiots."
It seems like now the only thing the industry cares about is figuring out how to get the US government to buy more Bitcoin. The repetitive headlines get kind of exhausting. As an industry, is this really what we focus on now? Imagine telling Satoshi that all Bitcoiners would care about in 2024/2025 was ETFs and government-owned Bitcoin. Do you think that would have aligned with his original vision?
What happened to the feeling I had about crypto 10 years ago? It was exciting seeing all the innovation and curiosity so many of us had as to how crypto may change the world.
You may say that ETFs and Strategic Reserves are changing the world. But they are not changing the world in the way many of us imagined. Sure, they are getting crypto in front of more people, but that does not necessarily improve the lives of everyday people. How do we actually integrate crypto into peoples' lives? Just talking about ETFs and strategic reserves does not feel like the right answer to me.
But deep down most people know that both ETFs and Strategic Reserves are antithetical to Bitcoin, but they choose to ignore it because the focus of this cycle has mostly been about
"How can we get more people to buy Bitcoin" rather than...
"How can we change the world with Bitcoin?"
How does Bitcoin sitting in a government wallet improve Bitcoin?
As someone who has been on the Bitcoin dominance train for the last few years, I still think dominance will go higher in the coming months.
But in my opinion this cycle has focused on all the wrong things (memecoins, ETFs, and strategic reserves). Obviously questioning the main narratives of this cycle will likely draw criticism, but it always make sense to question the things that the masses treat as "obviously good." After all, I think many people would have laughed if you told them crypto would basically be down only for a while after January 20th.
Regardless of what awaits the cryptoverse for the rest of 2025 and 2026, I hope that next cycle we can get back to what made crypto so great in the first place. #BTC #ETH #bnb
Collected from -Benjamin Cowen.
$BTC
$ETH
$BNB
Hey traders, Try this Fantastic Zone for Sell $ENA /USDC Is at resistance zone you can have a look for good selling trade in this pair with #zeromaker fees in this #USDC pair 📉🚀 Don't let this chance go for longtime holding for big profits 🎯🚀📉 #trade4profit #BigDrop #4H timeframe is super bearish for selling 📉🚀🎯
Hey traders, Try this Fantastic Zone for Sell

$ENA /USDC Is at resistance zone
you can have a look for good selling trade in this pair with #zeromaker fees in this #USDC pair 📉🚀

Don't let this chance go for longtime holding for big profits 🎯🚀📉

#trade4profit #BigDrop

#4H timeframe is super
bearish for selling 📉🚀🎯
XRP surges after Ripple CEO Garlinghouse says SEC is dropping its lawsuit against company #RippleVictory #Xrp $XRP #blockchain #CryptoPatience #BigDrop $XRP {spot}(XRPUSDT) surged after Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is no longer pursuing its appeal in the case against the payments company. The price of XRP was last higher by nearly 11% at $2.52. "It's been almost four years and about three months since the SEC originally sued us, certainly a painful journey in lots of ways," Garlinghouse said at the Digital Assets Summit in New York on Wednesday morning. "I really deeply believed that we were going to be on the right side of the law and on the right side of history." "The system just feels broken. That we had to fight this fight for the industry and you had an SEC attacking the industry, particularly the Ripple case," he continued. "There were no victims, there was no investor loss. They were just not acting in good faith." In 2020, the SEC sued Ripple for breaching U.S. securities laws by selling XRP without first registering it with the agency. The company scored a partial victory in 2023 when U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres handed down the decision, which was hailed as a landmark win for the crypto industry. Still, while XRP at that point was not considered a security when sold to retail investors on exchanges, it was considered an unregistered security offering if sold to institutional investors. The development comes as the SEC moves quickly to reverse much of the damage in the crypto industry left by the previous administration. Last month, the agency ended its enforcement case against Coinbase; closed its investigations into Robinhood's crypto unit, Uniswap, Gemini and Consensys with no enforcement action; scaled back its crypto enforcement unit; and declared meme coins are not securities. This week, the newly formed SEC crypto task force will kick off a roundtable series focused on defining the security status of digital assets.
XRP surges after Ripple CEO Garlinghouse says SEC is dropping its lawsuit against company #RippleVictory #Xrp $XRP
#blockchain #CryptoPatience #BigDrop

$XRP
surged after Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is no longer pursuing its appeal in the case against the payments company.

The price of XRP was last higher by nearly 11% at $2.52.

"It's been almost four years and about three months since the SEC originally sued us, certainly a painful journey in lots of ways," Garlinghouse said at the Digital Assets Summit in New York on Wednesday morning. "I really deeply believed that we were going to be on the right side of the law and on the right side of history."

"The system just feels broken. That we had to fight this fight for the industry and you had an SEC attacking the industry, particularly the Ripple case," he continued. "There were no victims, there was no investor loss. They were just not acting in good faith."

In 2020, the SEC sued Ripple for breaching U.S. securities laws by selling XRP without first registering it with the agency. The company scored a partial victory in 2023 when U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres handed down the decision, which was hailed as a landmark win for the crypto industry. Still, while XRP at that point was not considered a security when sold to retail investors on exchanges, it was considered an unregistered security offering if sold to institutional investors.

The development comes as the SEC moves quickly to reverse much of the damage in the crypto industry left by the previous administration. Last month, the agency ended its enforcement case against Coinbase; closed its investigations into Robinhood's crypto unit, Uniswap, Gemini and Consensys with no enforcement action; scaled back its crypto enforcement unit; and declared meme coins are not securities.

This week, the newly formed SEC crypto task force will kick off a roundtable series focused on defining the security status of digital assets.
ELECTRO XX
--
🚨💥 Shocking Revelation: The Simpsons Predict Bitcoin Will Hit $1? 💸📉

In Episode 8 of Season 37, The Simpsons might have just dropped another jaw-dropping prediction! Known for their eerily accurate forecasts 🧐🔮—from political events to tech innovations—the legendary show tackled cryptocurrency this time, and it’s sending shockwaves 🌊 through the crypto world.

The episode features a storyline where Bitcoin’s price plummets to $1 💵, causing chaos in Springfield’s economy 🏙️. Lisa Simpson dives deep into the aftermath, exploring the implications of centralized systems overtaking decentralized currencies. Fiction or foreshadowing? 🤔

🔥 Key Highlights From the Episode:

🤑 A mysterious billionaire manipulates the crypto market, sparking debates about regulation.

🍩 Homer sells his Bitcoin stash for donuts, only to see it rebound the next day.

😏 Bart jokes about buying Bitcoin at $1 to “become a trillionaire.”

What Does This Mean for Crypto Investors?
While The Simpsons are known for satire 😂, their track record of accurate predictions has left many questioning if this is just entertainment—or a hidden warning 🚨. With the market’s recent volatility 📊, could Bitcoin really hit $1? Highly unlikely, but the episode is a reminder of the risks and unpredictability of crypto trading 🚀⚠️.

👨‍💻 Crypto Community Reacts:
The episode has sparked memes 🤣, debates 🗣️, and speculation about market manipulation 🎭. Binance encourages all crypto enthusiasts to remember the importance of DYOR (Do Your Own Research) 📚🔎 and to stay calm in volatile markets.

💬 Are The Simpsons onto something, or is this just another hilarious pop-culture moment? Share your thoughts below!

🌟 Stay tuned to Binance for the latest crypto trends, predictions, and news—real or fictional! 🌐

⚠️ Disclaimer: This post is for entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

#BTC #BTCHOLDER #Urgent
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number