Binance Square

AIBias

56 views
2 Discussing
Big dog127
--
šŸ¤– AI’s Shocking Blind Spot: It Still Doesn’t Understand ā€œNOā€! 🚫 AI can beat you at chess, write essays like Shakespeare, and even help diagnose diseases. But here’s the scary part — it still doesn’t understand one of the simplest human words: ā€œNO.ā€ A groundbreaking MIT study just exposed a major flaw in today’s most advanced vision-language AIs (the ones that process images + text). They fail badly when asked to interpret negations — words like ā€œno,ā€ ā€œnot,ā€ or ā€œdoesn’t.ā€ Why does this matter? Imagine an AI used in a hospital misreading ā€œno enlarged heartā€ as ā€œenlarged heart.ā€ That’s not a typo — that’s a life-altering error. Why it happens: These AIs aren’t logical thinkers — they’re pattern mimickers. And most image captions don’t mention what’s not in them. No one uploads a beach photo with the caption: ā€œNo sharks here.ā€ The MIT Test: Researchers used tricky image questions with negations. Result? Most AIs did worse than random guessing when ā€œnotā€ or ā€œnoā€ were involved. Even after training with synthetic negation data, the improvement was minimal. What’s the deeper problem? It’s called affirmation bias — AI assumes things exist unless told otherwise… and sometimes ignores ā€œotherwiseā€ anyway. That’s not just dumb — it’s dangerous. From healthcare to law, HR to finance, if AI can’t understand phrases like ā€œnot eligibleā€ or ā€œno signs of cancer,ā€ the consequences could be catastrophic. Bottom Line: Until AI learns the power of ā€œNO,ā€ we shouldn’t trust it with high-stakes decisions. This isn’t just a glitch — it’s a red flag we can’t ignore. #MachineLearning #AIBias #BTCAlert #BinanceAlpha #CryptoIntel
šŸ¤– AI’s Shocking Blind Spot: It Still Doesn’t Understand ā€œNOā€! 🚫

AI can beat you at chess, write essays like Shakespeare, and even help diagnose diseases. But here’s the scary part — it still doesn’t understand one of the simplest human words: ā€œNO.ā€

A groundbreaking MIT study just exposed a major flaw in today’s most advanced vision-language AIs (the ones that process images + text). They fail badly when asked to interpret negations — words like ā€œno,ā€ ā€œnot,ā€ or ā€œdoesn’t.ā€

Why does this matter?
Imagine an AI used in a hospital misreading ā€œno enlarged heartā€ as ā€œenlarged heart.ā€
That’s not a typo — that’s a life-altering error.

Why it happens:
These AIs aren’t logical thinkers — they’re pattern mimickers. And most image captions don’t mention what’s not in them. No one uploads a beach photo with the caption: ā€œNo sharks here.ā€

The MIT Test:
Researchers used tricky image questions with negations.
Result? Most AIs did worse than random guessing when ā€œnotā€ or ā€œnoā€ were involved.
Even after training with synthetic negation data, the improvement was minimal.

What’s the deeper problem?
It’s called affirmation bias — AI assumes things exist unless told otherwise… and sometimes ignores ā€œotherwiseā€ anyway.
That’s not just dumb — it’s dangerous.

From healthcare to law, HR to finance, if AI can’t understand phrases like ā€œnot eligibleā€ or ā€œno signs of cancer,ā€ the consequences could be catastrophic.

Bottom Line:
Until AI learns the power of ā€œNO,ā€ we shouldn’t trust it with high-stakes decisions.
This isn’t just a glitch — it’s a red flag we can’t ignore.

#MachineLearning #AIBias #BTCAlert #BinanceAlpha #CryptoIntel
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
āš”ļø Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
šŸ’¬ Interact with your favorite creators
šŸ‘ Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number