Binance Square

火币

16,330 views
13 Discussing
Mr Swing
--
See original
See original
In the currency circle, never believe any founder who says that he has done something through all means, it is very likely to be the last wave of cuts! Justin Sun's $HTX should be careful. Why BNB can be raised is because of a group of believers. Belief is gained with real money, not with words! #火币 #BNB坚持持有
In the currency circle, never believe any founder who says that he has done something through all means, it is very likely to be the last wave of cuts!
Justin Sun's $HTX should be careful. Why BNB can be raised is because of a group of believers. Belief is gained with real money, not with words!

#火币 #BNB坚持持有
See original
Is ht valuable? If you put aside the prejudice against Sun Yuchen, ht is underestimated. Although Huobi has been losing customers this year, its financial strength is still sufficient. In addition, the total market value of ht is only 400 million U.S. dollars, and it has also done quite well in terms of empowerment: discounts on handling fees, new products, etc. In addition, the destruction intensity is also very strong. It has the highest destruction rate among all platform coins. For Ouyi okb170 With a market value of bnb49.4 billion, ht is very undervalued. In addition, there is one thing about ht that I think is a great benefit. Loss In the first half of this year, Sun Yuchen did two things. The first was to confiscate a large amount of HT belonging to Li Lin’s brother Li Wei, and the second was the liquidation incident of a large HT owner’s spot warehouse. Both of these things show that Justin Sun is not good in terms of character. But we are from an investment perspective. A large amount of HT has been put into his own pocket by Justin Sun, who has firmly controlled the market. (In the past, HT’s parking spaces were very heavy). In addition, large HT investors did not dare to increase leverage to avoid an incident like the last time when the price was directly transferred from 3 US dollars to 0.3 US dollars. In other words, the current HT has a strong wheel control, very little leverage, and the car is very light. Once Justin Sun makes some moves, he will be completely unstoppable ten times or dozens of times. Having said so many good things about ht, let’s talk about its bad things. First, Huobi’s reputation has been ruined by Justin Sun. It’s extremely difficult to make money from Justin Sun. Second, Sun Yuchen may give up ht to support the new platform currency at any time. If this happens, ht directly gg. Third, Huobi’s ecological chain is really garbage among garbage. Objectively speaking, the current risks and opportunities of ht are basically 55. I'll buy some myself. But if you do this with a large position, the possibility of it returning to zero is very high. #BNB🔥 #BTC #火币 If you think what I said is good, you can find me in the official account Block Vision to communicate together!
Is ht valuable?
If you put aside the prejudice against Sun Yuchen, ht is underestimated. Although Huobi has been losing customers this year, its financial strength is still sufficient. In addition, the total market value of ht is only 400 million U.S. dollars, and it has also done quite well in terms of empowerment: discounts on handling fees, new products, etc. In addition, the destruction intensity is also very strong. It has the highest destruction rate among all platform coins. For Ouyi okb170 With a market value of bnb49.4 billion, ht is very undervalued.
In addition, there is one thing about ht that I think is a great benefit. Loss In the first half of this year, Sun Yuchen did two things. The first was to confiscate a large amount of HT belonging to Li Lin’s brother Li Wei, and the second was the liquidation incident of a large HT owner’s spot warehouse. Both of these things show that Justin Sun is not good in terms of character. But we are from an investment perspective. A large amount of HT has been put into his own pocket by Justin Sun, who has firmly controlled the market. (In the past, HT’s parking spaces were very heavy). In addition, large HT investors did not dare to increase leverage to avoid an incident like the last time when the price was directly transferred from 3 US dollars to 0.3 US dollars.
In other words, the current HT has a strong wheel control, very little leverage, and the car is very light. Once Justin Sun makes some moves, he will be completely unstoppable ten times or dozens of times.
Having said so many good things about ht, let’s talk about its bad things. First, Huobi’s reputation has been ruined by Justin Sun. It’s extremely difficult to make money from Justin Sun. Second, Sun Yuchen may give up ht to support the new platform currency at any time. If this happens, ht directly gg. Third, Huobi’s ecological chain is really garbage among garbage.
Objectively speaking, the current risks and opportunities of ht are basically 55. I'll buy some myself. But if you do this with a large position, the possibility of it returning to zero is very high. #BNB🔥 #BTC #火币 If you think what I said is good, you can find me in the official account Block Vision to communicate together!
See original
Did "Sun Ge" suffer a loss of 30 million dollars? A few days ago, the top figure in the crypto circle #孙宇晨 suddenly revealed a scar on Twitter—this founder of TRON, known for "cutting leeks," was actually "cut" by Li Lin's team for 30 million dollars during the acquisition of Huobi Exchange. This dispute, dubbed the "most expensive tuition fee in the Chinese crypto circle," marked the first time that the usually benefit-taking "Sun Ge" found himself in the position of a victim. The story began in 2022 when Sun Yuchen acquired #火币 , founded by Li Lin. On February 5, 2025, Sun Yuchen suddenly launched an attack on social media, accusing #李林 of concealing key financial information during the sale of Huobi. He claimed that after the acquisition, he discovered an internal funding gap of as much as 30 million dollars, forcing him to inject funds urgently to maintain the company's normal operations. Li Lin quickly responded, pointing out that the so-called "30 million dollar funding gap" was not as Sun Yuchen had stated. He explained that this funding gap arose from a margin trading business that resulted in liquidation losses due to extreme market conditions. He emphasized that this was properly handled through company revenues at the time of delivery and there was no concealment. The two parties indeed had discrepancies in the method of calculating user assets, but this was not sufficient to constitute a so-called "financial loophole." In summary, both sides held their ground. After a round of verbal battles in the media, Li Lin expressed a willingness to seek a fair ruling through the Hong Kong courts or a third-party arbitration institution, rather than making unilateral judgments on social media. Sun Yuchen claimed he had sued in Hong Kong, vowing to continue pursuing the debt. Looking at the background of this incident, it reflects numerous issues present in the cryptocurrency market. Uncertainty in regulation, market manipulation and fraud, information asymmetry, insufficient investor protection, market volatility, uneven resource allocation, and technological limitations have collectively led to disorder and instability in the market. These issues not only affect the rights of market participants but also pose challenges to the healthy development of the entire cryptocurrency industry. In the future, measures such as strengthening regulation, improving market transparency, and enhancing risk management tools need to be taken to address these issues and promote the healthy development of the cryptocurrency market. In the dark forest lacking regulation, there has never been a sickle; everyone is a leek. #孙割 #币圈
Did "Sun Ge" suffer a loss of 30 million dollars?
A few days ago, the top figure in the crypto circle #孙宇晨 suddenly revealed a scar on Twitter—this founder of TRON, known for "cutting leeks," was actually "cut" by Li Lin's team for 30 million dollars during the acquisition of Huobi Exchange. This dispute, dubbed the "most expensive tuition fee in the Chinese crypto circle," marked the first time that the usually benefit-taking "Sun Ge" found himself in the position of a victim.
The story began in 2022 when Sun Yuchen acquired #火币 , founded by Li Lin. On February 5, 2025, Sun Yuchen suddenly launched an attack on social media, accusing #李林 of concealing key financial information during the sale of Huobi. He claimed that after the acquisition, he discovered an internal funding gap of as much as 30 million dollars, forcing him to inject funds urgently to maintain the company's normal operations. Li Lin quickly responded, pointing out that the so-called "30 million dollar funding gap" was not as Sun Yuchen had stated. He explained that this funding gap arose from a margin trading business that resulted in liquidation losses due to extreme market conditions. He emphasized that this was properly handled through company revenues at the time of delivery and there was no concealment. The two parties indeed had discrepancies in the method of calculating user assets, but this was not sufficient to constitute a so-called "financial loophole."
In summary, both sides held their ground. After a round of verbal battles in the media, Li Lin expressed a willingness to seek a fair ruling through the Hong Kong courts or a third-party arbitration institution, rather than making unilateral judgments on social media. Sun Yuchen claimed he had sued in Hong Kong, vowing to continue pursuing the debt.
Looking at the background of this incident, it reflects numerous issues present in the cryptocurrency market. Uncertainty in regulation, market manipulation and fraud, information asymmetry, insufficient investor protection, market volatility, uneven resource allocation, and technological limitations have collectively led to disorder and instability in the market. These issues not only affect the rights of market participants but also pose challenges to the healthy development of the entire cryptocurrency industry. In the future, measures such as strengthening regulation, improving market transparency, and enhancing risk management tools need to be taken to address these issues and promote the healthy development of the cryptocurrency market.
In the dark forest lacking regulation, there has never been a sickle; everyone is a leek.
#孙割 #币圈
See original
See original
Huobi confiscated our 10,000x coinsHuobi unilaterally and arbitrarily changed the asset custody agreement. These small coins that cannot be withdrawn are equivalent to direct confiscation. Will these confiscated small coins become 10,000 times more valuable? https://www.huobi.info/zh-cn/?menu=0 Account management fee For users in mainland China who still have assets, we will refer to the usual industry practices and charge a monthly account management fee to pay for the daily operation and maintenance costs of the exclusive asset custody website. The remaining part will be transferred to public welfare, and all income will not be used for commercial purposes. If you do not want to be charged management fees, please complete the withdrawal as soon as possible. The standards for charging management fees are as follows: 1. The method of charging account management fees is as follows: Starting from February 1, 2022, a snapshot of the assets of users in mainland China will be taken at 24:00 (GMT+8) on the 15th of each natural month (the snapshot will include your assets in all accounts on the platform). Then within 15 days, the account management fee will be automatically charged based on the user's snapshot data. (From January 1, 2023, from 00:00 (GMT+8) on the 1st day of each calendar month to 24:00 (GMT+8) on the 15th day, the account management fee receivable in a single currency will be fully charged for accounts that can be converted into USDT and the converted account management fee receivable is less than the "minimum account management fee") 2. Account management charging standards are: 0.5% of snapshot assets will be charged every month, and a minimum fixed management fee of 2U will be charged for a single currency. If the account management fee receivable in a single currency can be converted into USDT and the converted account management fee receivable is less than 2U, the full amount will be charged. (If a currency has been offline, the management fee will be calculated according to the USDT conversion price corresponding to the currency when it was offline) 3. Certification standards for users in mainland China: users who have been authenticated as mainland Chinese users on Huobi Global, and users who have not been authenticated will be judged based on their registered nationality.

Huobi confiscated our 10,000x coins

Huobi unilaterally and arbitrarily changed the asset custody agreement. These small coins that cannot be withdrawn are equivalent to direct confiscation. Will these confiscated small coins become 10,000 times more valuable? https://www.huobi.info/zh-cn/?menu=0
Account management fee For users in mainland China who still have assets, we will refer to the usual industry practices and charge a monthly account management fee to pay for the daily operation and maintenance costs of the exclusive asset custody website. The remaining part will be transferred to public welfare, and all income will not be used for commercial purposes. If you do not want to be charged management fees, please complete the withdrawal as soon as possible. The standards for charging management fees are as follows: 1. The method of charging account management fees is as follows: Starting from February 1, 2022, a snapshot of the assets of users in mainland China will be taken at 24:00 (GMT+8) on the 15th of each natural month (the snapshot will include your assets in all accounts on the platform). Then within 15 days, the account management fee will be automatically charged based on the user's snapshot data. (From January 1, 2023, from 00:00 (GMT+8) on the 1st day of each calendar month to 24:00 (GMT+8) on the 15th day, the account management fee receivable in a single currency will be fully charged for accounts that can be converted into USDT and the converted account management fee receivable is less than the "minimum account management fee") 2. Account management charging standards are: 0.5% of snapshot assets will be charged every month, and a minimum fixed management fee of 2U will be charged for a single currency. If the account management fee receivable in a single currency can be converted into USDT and the converted account management fee receivable is less than 2U, the full amount will be charged. (If a currency has been offline, the management fee will be calculated according to the USDT conversion price corresponding to the currency when it was offline) 3. Certification standards for users in mainland China: users who have been authenticated as mainland Chinese users on Huobi Global, and users who have not been authenticated will be judged based on their registered nationality.
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number