Binance Square

伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌

2,618 views
4 Discussing
薛定谔的猫叔
--
See original
Question 2: Since the US stock market changed to the T+1 trading rule, there have been two technical problems in less than a week. The first time was not reported publicly. Why? This time, Berkshire Hathaway's stock price was abnormal, but the Bloomberg analysts, economic experts, and US stock analysts who I often follow in foreign media, who basically have professional backgrounds, did not mention it at all? Do they really think that this abnormality is not a problem? Or do they deliberately ignore it? #伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌
Question 2:

Since the US stock market changed to the T+1 trading rule, there have been two technical problems in less than a week. The first time was not reported publicly. Why?
This time, Berkshire Hathaway's stock price was abnormal, but the Bloomberg analysts, economic experts, and US stock analysts who I often follow in foreign media, who basically have professional backgrounds, did not mention it at all? Do they really think that this abnormality is not a problem? Or do they deliberately ignore it?
#伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌
薛定谔的猫叔
--
Many people may doubt that the Berkshire stock price fell to 185 and there were transactions in my article. Did anyone really buy it?
In fact, from the subsequent transaction depth chart, there were only buy orders, no sell orders, and basically no transactions.
So I was also shocked that Bloomberg said that there were transactions when the stock price fell to 185.
#伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌
--
Bullish
See original
On the evening of June 3, the New York Stock Exchange suffered a technical failure, resulting in serious abnormalities in the price display of some stocks. Among them, the price of Berkshire Hathaway's Class A shares plummeted by nearly 100%, almost to zero, which attracted widespread attention from the market. At the same time, stocks such as Barrick Gold and Newcastle Power were also affected, and the trading price also plummeted by about 99%. Subsequently, the New York Stock Exchange quickly suspended trading of these stocks to stabilize market sentiment. This incident once again highlighted the fragility of the highly centralized architecture of the traditional financial system. In contrast, the price feed system of cryptocurrency exchanges has shown its unique advantages. These exchanges mainly rely on distributed oracles for pricing. Even if a certain oracle node fails or is attacked, it will not affect the pricing system of the entire exchange. This is the superiority of blockchain technology, which improves the stability and security of the system through decentralization. Therefore, this incident is undoubtedly good news for the oracle sector. As an important part of blockchain technology, oracles will be more and more widely used in cryptocurrency exchanges. With the continuous development of the market and the continuous advancement of technology, the oracle sector is expected to usher in more development opportunities. Among them, oracle projects such as $LINK , $API3 and $PYTH are worth paying attention to. They have broad application prospects and huge market potential in the blockchain field. Click the avatar to follow me, and I will share the latest information for free every day. What I need is fans. I just want to be a free blogger. #Velocore漏洞事件 #预言机 #伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌
On the evening of June 3, the New York Stock Exchange suffered a technical failure, resulting in serious abnormalities in the price display of some stocks. Among them, the price of Berkshire Hathaway's Class A shares plummeted by nearly 100%, almost to zero, which attracted widespread attention from the market. At the same time, stocks such as Barrick Gold and Newcastle Power were also affected, and the trading price also plummeted by about 99%. Subsequently, the New York Stock Exchange quickly suspended trading of these stocks to stabilize market sentiment.

This incident once again highlighted the fragility of the highly centralized architecture of the traditional financial system. In contrast, the price feed system of cryptocurrency exchanges has shown its unique advantages. These exchanges mainly rely on distributed oracles for pricing. Even if a certain oracle node fails or is attacked, it will not affect the pricing system of the entire exchange. This is the superiority of blockchain technology, which improves the stability and security of the system through decentralization.

Therefore, this incident is undoubtedly good news for the oracle sector. As an important part of blockchain technology, oracles will be more and more widely used in cryptocurrency exchanges. With the continuous development of the market and the continuous advancement of technology, the oracle sector is expected to usher in more development opportunities. Among them, oracle projects such as $LINK , $API3 and $PYTH are worth paying attention to. They have broad application prospects and huge market potential in the blockchain field.
Click the avatar to follow me, and I will share the latest information for free every day. What I need is fans. I just want to be a free blogger.
#Velocore漏洞事件 #预言机 #伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌
See original
What caused the 99.7% plunge in Buffett's company in a short period of time? Shortly after the opening of the U.S. stock market tonight, the stock price of Berkshire Hathaway, a company owned by the famous "stock god" Buffett, plummeted by 99.7%, from the closing price of $627,400 last Friday to $185.1, which shocked the market. Many people are worried that the company will "explode". However, Bloomberg quickly issued a statement to clarify that the stock price plunge was due to technical reasons. According to Bloomberg, there was an obvious malfunction in the operator of the New York Stock Exchange, which caused the suspension of volatility trading of about a dozen companies shortly after the opening, including Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. and Abbott Laboratories. Berkshire Hathaway caused panic in the market because it was highly concerned by market traders. In fact, this time it affected the stocks of more than a dozen companies. The New York Stock Exchange called it a technical problem, but the head of the exchange refused to disclose any information to the outside world. This is the second technical problem fluctuation in the U.S. stock market since the U.S. stock market switched from T+2 to T+1 transaction settlement last week. Yes, you heard it right, this is the second time. Just last Thursday, the real-time pricing of the largest US stock index was stopped because the index provider S&P Dow Jones Indices had trouble disseminating information, but this failure did not affect individual stocks and only caused minor interference, which we actually did not find abnormal. The most terrible reason for this "technical" failure (let's call it a technical failure for now) is not the plunge in Berkshire Hathaway's stock price, but the fact that transactions actually occurred after the plunge to 185.1. It is estimated that other companies' stock prices have also encountered such problems. Although the trading of these companies has been suspended, it is unknown whether the subsequent data rollback will bring more trouble. Views of various analysts: Some analysts have cautiously mentioned risk awareness, believing that in less than a week after the US stock market changed its settlement date, continuous failures may cause greater chaos to the US stock market and even Wall Street. Personal opinion: The change of US stock settlement from T+2 to T+1 has undoubtedly released the market liquidity faster, but with the increase in liquidity and trading volume, data pressure will also be greater.Will the frequent technical problems in the US stock market make more traders wary of the risk of "overheating" in the US stock market? The technical problems in the US stock market last Thursday did not cause much volatility, but the mainstream media did not disclose it. This is a bit strange. If you have confidence in yourself, you don't have to be afraid. On the contrary, choosing to publish information after causing a greater impact for the second time is a bit confusing. In any case, if it is determined that the abnormal market is caused by technical problems, a large amount of related data will inevitably be rolled back. As for the risks, everyone can consider it by themselves. This is just a bold guess and has not been verified yet. #伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌 #美股
What caused the 99.7% plunge in Buffett's company in a short period of time?

Shortly after the opening of the U.S. stock market tonight, the stock price of Berkshire Hathaway, a company owned by the famous "stock god" Buffett, plummeted by 99.7%, from the closing price of $627,400 last Friday to $185.1, which shocked the market. Many people are worried that the company will "explode". However, Bloomberg quickly issued a statement to clarify that the stock price plunge was due to technical reasons.

According to Bloomberg, there was an obvious malfunction in the operator of the New York Stock Exchange, which caused the suspension of volatility trading of about a dozen companies shortly after the opening, including Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. and Abbott Laboratories. Berkshire Hathaway caused panic in the market because it was highly concerned by market traders.

In fact, this time it affected the stocks of more than a dozen companies. The New York Stock Exchange called it a technical problem, but the head of the exchange refused to disclose any information to the outside world.

This is the second technical problem fluctuation in the U.S. stock market since the U.S. stock market switched from T+2 to T+1 transaction settlement last week. Yes, you heard it right, this is the second time. Just last Thursday, the real-time pricing of the largest US stock index was stopped because the index provider S&P Dow Jones Indices had trouble disseminating information, but this failure did not affect individual stocks and only caused minor interference, which we actually did not find abnormal.
The most terrible reason for this "technical" failure (let's call it a technical failure for now) is not the plunge in Berkshire Hathaway's stock price, but the fact that transactions actually occurred after the plunge to 185.1. It is estimated that other companies' stock prices have also encountered such problems. Although the trading of these companies has been suspended, it is unknown whether the subsequent data rollback will bring more trouble.

Views of various analysts:
Some analysts have cautiously mentioned risk awareness, believing that in less than a week after the US stock market changed its settlement date, continuous failures may cause greater chaos to the US stock market and even Wall Street.

Personal opinion:
The change of US stock settlement from T+2 to T+1 has undoubtedly released the market liquidity faster, but with the increase in liquidity and trading volume, data pressure will also be greater.Will the frequent technical problems in the US stock market make more traders wary of the risk of "overheating" in the US stock market?

The technical problems in the US stock market last Thursday did not cause much volatility, but the mainstream media did not disclose it. This is a bit strange. If you have confidence in yourself, you don't have to be afraid. On the contrary, choosing to publish information after causing a greater impact for the second time is a bit confusing.

In any case, if it is determined that the abnormal market is caused by technical problems, a large amount of related data will inevitably be rolled back. As for the risks, everyone can consider it by themselves. This is just a bold guess and has not been verified yet.
#伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌 #美股
See original
Many people may doubt that the Berkshire stock price fell to 185 and there were transactions in my article. Did anyone really buy it? In fact, from the subsequent transaction depth chart, there were only buy orders, no sell orders, and basically no transactions. So I was also shocked that Bloomberg said that there were transactions when the stock price fell to 185. #伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌
Many people may doubt that the Berkshire stock price fell to 185 and there were transactions in my article. Did anyone really buy it?
In fact, from the subsequent transaction depth chart, there were only buy orders, no sell orders, and basically no transactions.
So I was also shocked that Bloomberg said that there were transactions when the stock price fell to 185.
#伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌
薛定谔的猫叔
--
What caused the 99.7% plunge in Buffett's company in a short period of time?

Shortly after the opening of the U.S. stock market tonight, the stock price of Berkshire Hathaway, a company owned by the famous "stock god" Buffett, plummeted by 99.7%, from the closing price of $627,400 last Friday to $185.1, which shocked the market. Many people are worried that the company will "explode". However, Bloomberg quickly issued a statement to clarify that the stock price plunge was due to technical reasons.

According to Bloomberg, there was an obvious malfunction in the operator of the New York Stock Exchange, which caused the suspension of volatility trading of about a dozen companies shortly after the opening, including Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. and Abbott Laboratories. Berkshire Hathaway caused panic in the market because it was highly concerned by market traders.

In fact, this time it affected the stocks of more than a dozen companies. The New York Stock Exchange called it a technical problem, but the head of the exchange refused to disclose any information to the outside world.

This is the second technical problem fluctuation in the U.S. stock market since the U.S. stock market switched from T+2 to T+1 transaction settlement last week. Yes, you heard it right, this is the second time. Just last Thursday, the real-time pricing of the largest US stock index was stopped because the index provider S&P Dow Jones Indices had trouble disseminating information, but this failure did not affect individual stocks and only caused minor interference, which we actually did not find abnormal.
The most terrible reason for this "technical" failure (let's call it a technical failure for now) is not the plunge in Berkshire Hathaway's stock price, but the fact that transactions actually occurred after the plunge to 185.1. It is estimated that other companies' stock prices have also encountered such problems. Although the trading of these companies has been suspended, it is unknown whether the subsequent data rollback will bring more trouble.

Views of various analysts:
Some analysts have cautiously mentioned risk awareness, believing that in less than a week after the US stock market changed its settlement date, continuous failures may cause greater chaos to the US stock market and even Wall Street.

Personal opinion:
The change of US stock settlement from T+2 to T+1 has undoubtedly released the market liquidity faster, but with the increase in liquidity and trading volume, data pressure will also be greater.Will the frequent technical problems in the US stock market make more traders wary of the risk of "overheating" in the US stock market?

The technical problems in the US stock market last Thursday did not cause much volatility, but the mainstream media did not disclose it. This is a bit strange. If you have confidence in yourself, you don't have to be afraid. On the contrary, choosing to publish information after causing a greater impact for the second time is a bit confusing.

In any case, if it is determined that the abnormal market is caused by technical problems, a large amount of related data will inevitably be rolled back. As for the risks, everyone can consider it by themselves. This is just a bold guess and has not been verified yet.
#伯克希尔哈萨韦股价暴跌 #美股
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number