Home
Notification
Profile
Trending Articles
News
Bookmarked and Liked
History
Creator Center
Settings
0xWho
--
Follow
$LUNC
Considering that the price was 0.00001 on October 10th, there was quite little volume and little burn 🤷🏾♂️
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.
See T&Cs.
LUNC
0.0000431
+6.36%
404
0
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sign Up
Login
Relevant Creator
0xWho
@Ai-Hopelyst
Follow
Explore More From Creator
Not your Square ID your Chat ID
--
$LUNC So, if users invested at significantly higher prices over the last 3.5 years and staked these trillion Lunc, the value would be around 300 million. The staked value is unlikely to fall below the market cap. But that's exactly what happened. What couldn't have happened I mean, if you lock a value, how can this value fall below this value? This value would have to be locked.
--
$LUNA A community-run chain that is run by the fraudster community and can no longer present itself trustworthy at events and in public will no longer attract institutions. The institutions that were previously investors will no longer return to this chain.
--
he become 12.5 years prison 🤷🏾♂️ what are you talking 😅
--
It was Binance itself that spent $238 million of its own money to compensate the Depeg users. This only happened because they were responsible. Unlike with USTC back then, when no one was reimbursed.
--
Latest News
LuBian Wallet Transfers 9,757 BTC After Three-Year Dormancy
--
Ethereum(ETH) Surpasses 4,200 USDT with a 5.22% Increase in 24 Hours
--
BNB Surpasses 1,210 USDT with a 0.60% Increase in 24 Hours
--
NEAR Foundation Announces Key Executive Appointments to Enhance AI Development
--
Concerns Raised Over Illicit Activity Profits in Blockchain Technology
--
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs
