A Manhattan judge just unfroze $57.6 million in USDC that had been tied up in the Libra coin dispute. What stood out to me is how the court leaned heavily on one principle. Unless there’s clear evidence of irreparable harm, money shouldn’t be locked away this early in a case. In this libra dispute digital asset litigation, the judge pointed out that both defendants had been cooperating, hadn’t moved the funds, and weren’t flight risks. That alone undercuts the plaintiffs’ push for a sweeping freeze.
Wallets Still Hold Millions, Undercutting Freeze Request
The wallets in question still hold $13 million and $44 million, untouched since June. That detail matters because it shows the money is still there if damages need to be paid. The judge said that plaintiffs can always be compensated later with monetary damages. This makes an emergency freeze hard to justify. It’s a reminder that courts don’t like speculative arguments, especially when real evidence is thin.
Speculative Fraud Claims in Libra Coin Dispute
The class action plaintiffs had argued that the promoters of the Libra coin misled investors by amplifying endorsements from public figures. But the judge wasn’t convinced that this was enough to prove fraud at this stage. Without a strong showing that the investors would be harmed irreparably, the case didn’t meet the standard for keeping assets frozen. It feels like the court is drawing a line. Claims alone aren’t enough; you will need evidence that ties directly to investor losses.
Defense attorneys wasted no time framing this as proof that the case is weak. They’re already signaling motions to dismiss. From their point of view, the fact that no assets have moved and that they’ve been fully compliant makes the accusations look weak. The plaintiffs’ lawyers, meanwhile, haven’t said anything publicly. That silence hints they might be rethinking their approach.
Judges Apply Traditional Finance Standards to Crypto Cases
This libra dispute digital asset case highlights how judges are approaching crypto with the same standards they use in traditional finance. If courts continue to insist on proof of irreparable harm before imposing freezes, class action plaintiffs in the digital asset space will face a much higher bar. That could be good for protecting defendants from overly broad injunctions, but tougher for victims in cases where money can disappear quickly.
Brief Price Bump After Libra Coin Dispute Ruling
There was even a short-lived bump in the Libra coin’s price after the ruling. Though the token is still worth only a fraction of its former peak. Market reactions aside, the main signal here is judicial caution. Regulators may go after fraud more aggressively. However, civil courts appear unwilling to let asset freezes become a default move in crypto disputes.
This case could end up being cited in future digital asset litigation as an early precedent. If nothing else, it shows that crypto disputes won’t be judged by special rules. Courts are sticking to fundamentals, and anyone pursuing a class action in this space will need far stronger evidence to justify tying up millions of dollars in assets.
The post US Judge Unfreezes 57 Million USDC in Libra Coin Dispute appeared first on Coinfomania.
