A protocol spit me out eETH and for the life of me I can't f | gregthegreek on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

A protocol spit me out eETH and for the life of me I can't figure out how to unwrap it 
@EtherFi improve you app

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

ETH

2,603.32

+2.58%

0

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@gregthegreek

Explore More From Creator

Buy back -> Burn

--

Orderflow generators should receive a disproportionate amount of fees it generates for itself. I think this is a table stakes fact. Thus if you’re an L2 creating a vibrant ecosystem that generates an ample amount of demand for block space. That L2 should capture the largest share of fees on that block space. This is exactly why I struggle to understand any view points that state the L1 validators should receive a greater return. L1 validators are providing the bare minimum, which is capital, hardware & electricity. Although in those cases the bar is quite low (aside from 32 eth but Lido et al have set the bar LOW). Validators are not bringing new users, they aren’t on-boarding @Shopify or @DoorDash Block space overtime is a commodity and it’s all the ecosystem efforts that will drive the demand, that’s where the fees should be disproportionately paid. Idealistically, that should be redistributed or reinvested back into the apps bringing the users to the chain itself. Although the apps themselves should be generating fees one way or another. —- The argument that we are in this because of the L2 roadmap didn’t prioritize scaling the L1 is also a farce. I have yet to see any viable path for an L1 to scale from a decentralized POV to any reasonable means. Maybe ZK paths forward can solve for that, but Ethereum itself is a general compute layer and will forever have the tradeoffs. General compute must scale horizontally and we’ve been seeing this for years when sidechains were what we call L2s back in 2017/2018. Chains such as GTE, Solana etc.. have proven you can scale ridiculously but to a limit. You fully tradeoff decentralization. You also tightly align with a set of use cass (such as DeFi). Finally you simply cannot index fast enough (today) which forces co-location, and recreates flashboys. I believe Ethereum is doing it right based on its goals. I believe it needs to scale the L1 a lot more. I believe it’s here to last

--

Orderflow generators should receive a disproportionate amount of fees it generates for itself. I think this is a table stakes fact. Thus if you’re an L2 creating a vibrant ecosystem that generates an ample amount of demand for block space. That L2 should capture the largest share of fees on that block space. This is exactly why I struggle to understand any view points that state the L1 validators should receive a greater return. L1 validators are providing the bare minimum, which is capital, hardware & electricity. Although in those cases the bar is quite low (aside from 32 eth but Lido et al have set the bar LOW). Validators are not bringing new users, they aren’t on-boarding @Shopify or @DoorDash Block space overtime is a commodity and it’s all the ecosystem efforts that will drive the demand, that’s where the fees should be disproportionately paid. Idealistically, that should be redistributed or reinvested back into the apps bringing the users to the chain itself. Although the apps themselves should be generating fees one way or another.

--

The “45 day” bull run is starting All the high noise signals are here, so don’t forget to take some profits.

--

What share of a privacy pool do you need to own to have high correlation over addresses/deposits? Is it like 66% or something higher like 90%? I presume it depends if input size == output size, which might be very easy?

--

Latest News

Musk Questions Trump's Transparency on Epstein Files

--

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Potential Upside Amid Key Resistance Levels

--

U.S. Announces New Tariffs on Copper and Pharmaceuticals

--

CoreWeave's Stock Declines Amid Acquisition Concerns

--

Ethereum(ETH) Surpasses 2,600 USDT with a 3.01% Increase in 24 Hours

--

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences