Let’s be honest. Most InfoFi campaigns today feel like engagement games with shiny leaderboards.

It works in the short term. You pump posts, tag friends, ride waves. But what happens next week? Next month? The moment rewards dry up, attention vanishes. It’s a short-term dopamine loop dressed as growth.

I heard Xeet wants to improve the InfoFi space, it has to do more than reward participation. It needs to reward contribution.

Here’s what would move the needle:

1/ If signal > noise is the goal, show us how it’s being detected. The leaked dashboard was a strong start: signal grading, content quality, sentiment, etc. Lean into that. Let users see how signal is scored, and how to improve.

2/ Every project has the same 3 tweet formats now. Let’s change that. Xeet should create bonus incentives for originality: fresh ideas, novel takes, threads that go beyond “I’m bullish”.

3/ Followers can be botted. Engagement can be bought. But who interacts with your content matters. Xeet could elevate voices based on quality of interaction, not just quantity. (A like from a signal creator > 10 from farming rings)

4/ InfoFi needs more than earnings. It needs discovery. Build a rotating spotlight for high-signal contributors across different topics. Help projects find their best advocates, not just their loudest.

5/ Most InfoFi posts today go into the void. Projects never respond. Xeet can fix this by nudging projects to engage: reply, repost, even rate creators. This turns InfoFi into conversation, not just commentary.

At its best, InfoFi can reshape how crypto grows by aligning creators, products, and real users. But that only happens if we stop farming and start curating.

Xeet has the attention. Now it has to earn the trust.