crypto ppl are so damaged that they think angel investing is | 0xMert_ on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

crypto ppl are so damaged that they think angel investing is hard because they didn't make money in 8 months
it is hard (most will fail) but not because you didn't make money in 4 hours
venture-scale startups take many, many years

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

232

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@0xMert_

Explore More From Creator

lol best of luck shutting down oil exports noobs — I still have my digital oil✌️

--

good to see crypto acting as a safe haven against geopolitical tyranny here — exactly how we designed it

--

no one in the world understands complex geopolitics like the mfers w derpcoin69420 in their wallets

--

something happened what does this mean for my chudjak bags

--

here's how I think about crypto investments first, "crypto" is too broad of a term and masks too much underlying information and information is the fundamental input of decision so break them up in some way this is roughly how I do it: - apps - chains - protocols - memes now, there's another distinction to be made namely: infrastructure vs. platform basically, infrastructure is fungible but a platform is not a platform has stickiness due to some sort of network effect (either via liquidity, state, developers, socials, mimetics, or whatever) on average, infrastructure is a riskier investment because it exerts no control, it can be switched out — but, infrastructure sometimes can become a platform and this would be an asymmetric outcome (Solana started out as infrastructure and then became a platform for example — almost all new L1s and new L2s are infrastructure at first, not platforms) each of the above categories can either be infrastructure or platform; you would assess this on your own for example: coin/btc/eth/sol are platforms — they have something non-forkable in terms of either tech, liquidity, distribution, social cohesion; basically *state* but shitcoin5670 is "infrastructure" in the sense that it can be swapped out for shitcoin5671 on average — same with *any new chain* or *any new protocol* infrastructure is only useful to the extent that it can result in un-forkable state and become a platform the only exception is if the market is so large that being infrastructure is still highly profitable (e.g., a bank stock in tradfi) from there, you decide how much to allocate to platforms vs. infrastructure and in which categories depending on your risk profile

--

Latest News

Bitcoin(BTC) Drops Below 99,000 USDT with a 4.52% Decrease in 24 Hours

--

AguilaTrades Closes Bitcoin Short Position with $112,000 Profit

--

Bitcoin Demand Shows Signs of Cooling After Price Surge

--

Global Liquidations Reach $1.015 Billion in 24 Hours

--

Iranian Parliament Considers Closing Hormuz Strait

--

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences