CHINA

Sam Altman has declared that the United States is making a mistake in how it approaches China’s artificial intelligence. The OpenAI CEO told a group of journalists in San Francisco that Donald Trump’s latest ban on advanced chips won’t stop Beijing from advancing in AI.
According to CNBC, Sam met with reporters at the Presidio hotel over Mediterranean food, where he explained how serious the situation really is. “I worry about China,” he said.
He warned that this isn’t a race where one side simply pulls ahead and wins. “There’s inference capacity, where China can probably build faster,” Altman explained. “There’s research, there’s product; the entire thing has many layers.”
He argued that the U.S. is focusing on just one part — blocking chip exports — while China is working on the full stack. And despite tighter controls, Sam doubts these efforts are actually working. When asked if fewer GPUs going to China was a win, he responded: “My instinct is that it’s not working.”

Trump Blocks Chips, but Altman Says the Policy Is Failing
Trump, now back in the White House, approved a full ban on exporting high-end chips to China in April 2025. This went further than earlier rules under President Joe Biden, which had already restricted China’s access to advanced AI hardware.
Trump’s new policy even prohibited the sale of modified chips that had been designed to comply with Biden’s earlier rules. But just last week, Washington tweaked the rules again.
Under the new arrangement, Nvidia and AMD can once again sell certain “China-safe” chips — but they must hand over 15% of the revenue from those sales to the U.S. government. Altman didn’t comment directly on this deal, but he made it clear that controlling AI progress through policy alone isn’t realistic.
“You can control exports, but maybe that’s not the right thing… people may just build factories or find other solutions,” he said. “I’d love a simple solution. But my instinct says: this is hard.”
He emphasized that it’s not just about chips. Chinese companies are already collaborating with local suppliers such as Huawei. U.S. controls haven’t stopped them — if anything, they’ve accelerated their efforts. While America remains dependent on Nvidia and AMD, Chinese labs are creating homegrown alternatives.

China’s AI Push Forces OpenAI to Release New Models
Altman added that China’s rapid progress has also forced OpenAI to release new models of its own. For years, the company resisted publishing full models, keeping everything locked behind APIs. But as China releases more open tools such as DeepSeek, OpenAI is shifting course.
“It became clear that if we didn’t do it, the world would lean heavily toward Chinese open-source models,” Sam explained. “That was certainly a factor in our decision. Not the only one, but a major one.”
OpenAI has just released two new models: gpt-oss-120b and gpt-oss-20b. These are the company’s first open-weight models since GPT-2 in 2019. The new models aren’t fully open source — the training data and source code remain closed — but the weights are now public.
This means developers can download and run them, even offline. Altman said the goal was to support developers in building locally-run coding agents.
Sam admitted that these models won’t impress everyone. Some developers argue they lack key features. He didn’t dispute that, saying his team built them for one reason only: and if global demand shifts, they will adapt. “If the world’s demand changes,” he said, “you can pivot to something else.”
At the moment, OpenAI is the only major U.S. company moving in this direction. Meta previously took a similar path with its LLaMA models, but Mark Zuckerberg recently suggested that may change. That leaves OpenAI at the forefront — at least for now — as Chinese labs continue releasing flexible tools available to anyone.
Altman has previously admitted that locking down models put OpenAI “on the wrong side of history.” This new move looks like an attempt to correct that — but also a way to keep developers inside OpenAI’s ecosystem, instead of losing them to Chinese labs offering greater freedom.

#AI , #SamAltman , #ArtificialInteligence , #TRUMP , #china

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

U.S. markets witnessed a dramatic shock in July when a group of Chinese microcap companies listed on Nasdaq lost more than 80% of their value within days, wiping out nearly $4 billion in investor wealth.

Sharp Rise, Steeper Fall
The hardest-hit companies included Concorde International, Ostin Technology, Top KingWin, Skyline Builders, Everbright Digital, Park Ha Biological Technology, and Pheton Holdings. Their stocks soared shortly before the crash thanks to aggressive promotion on WhatsApp and other social media platforms, only to collapse in a coordinated sell-off.
According to the Financial Times, the seven companies lost a combined market value of $3.7 billion. Each was heavily promoted in chat groups disguised as legitimate investment forums.

Fake Brokers Drive the Scam
Although no direct link between the companies and the manipulation has been proven, analysts point to clear signs of a classic pump-and-dump scheme. Scammers hype up cheap stocks, lure retail investors, then dump their shares en masse—leaving newcomers with worthless stock while the organizers walk away with profits.
The FBI reports that complaints about such stock scams have tripled year-over-year. Fraudsters increasingly pose as analysts or reputable firms to build trust, then spread links to groups hyping “can’t-miss” Chinese stocks.
Victims include Tia Castagno from London, who lost her entire savings after joining a WhatsApp group that promoted Ostin Technology, and Noushin Mirshokraei from Italy, who was convinced to invest $70,000 in Ostin based on fake news about a major U.S. partnership.

Warnings Ignored
Matthew Michel of InvestorLink says his team has been flagging suspicious activity around Chinese microcaps for months. For example, two weeks before Ostin Technology plunged 94% in a single day, InvestorLink had issued a warning.
Analysis showed that Ostin was promoted on Reddit by 12 accounts within hours—three of which were geolocated in Russia and Iran, matching patterns from other fraudulent operations.

Extreme Bubble Examples
A similar pattern occurred with Regencell Bioscience, a Chinese herbal medicine firm. Its stock skyrocketed by an astonishing 60,000%, briefly valuing the company at $38 billion—more than Walgreens. Yet, the price later collapsed by 83%, despite the firm posting a $4.4 million annual loss.
The cycle is clear: hype – surge – crash.
👉 The scandal highlights how easily retail investors can be manipulated and how difficult it is to spot frauds that keep shifting from one stock to another.

#china , #stockmarket , #NASDAQ , #WallStreet , #GlobalMarkets

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

China’s central bank surprised markets by announcing it has no plans to cut interest rates or required reserve ratios for now, even though the economy recorded its weakest monthly performance of 2025 in July.
In its quarterly policy report, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) stated it will maintain a “moderately loose” monetary stance but will rely on targeted and selective measures rather than broad stimulus. According to economists at Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, this signals that major monetary easing is not on the table – at least for now.

Slowing Growth, But Beijing Holds Back
The Chinese economy slowed sharply due to a combination of domestic capacity curbs, higher tariffs, weaker infrastructure investment, and cautious consumers. Even so, GDP grew 5.3% year-on-year in the first half of 2025 – enough for Beijing to believe that even a weaker second half could still meet its official growth target of around 5%.
Citigroup economist Yu Xiangrong noted that structural policy will likely be more important for PBOC in the coming months compared to across-the-board rate cuts. The bank still has confidence in the economy’s fundamentals to avoid radical interventions.

Inflation, Deflation, and Consumers
Deflationary pressures have lingered for more than two years. While overall inflation remains weak, the core consumer price index (excluding food and energy) has recently shown signs of improvement.
PBOC said that boosting consumer spending and addressing “disorderly” pricing mechanisms should help stabilize inflation expectations.

Financial Stability as Top Priority
The central bank also stressed that its main goal is to safeguard financial system stability. It flagged risks related to uncontrolled capital flows and systemic gaps – one reason why it is reluctant to unleash broad monetary easing, which could encourage arbitrage and speculation.
Earlier this year, PBOC strengthened its oversight by creating a macroprudential and financial stability committee and supporting the launch of a quasi-stabilization fund for stock purchases to calm market volatility.

What’s Next?
Analysts at Goldman Sachs and others expect that if the slowdown worsens, PBOC may resort to a modest rate cut of 10–20 basis points and a 50-basis-point cut in reserve requirements by year-end.
Additionally, speculation is rising over a possible fiscal package worth 500 billion yuan ($70 billion) aimed at directly supporting domestic demand.

👉 For now, China is relying on patience and targeted measures instead of flooding the system with cheap money. For investors, this means no major monetary stimulus in the short term, but if growth continues to deteriorate, PBOC will likely be forced into stronger action.

#china , #economy , #GlobalMarkets , #Inflation , #worldnews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Token vesting in airdrop distributions is becoming increasingly important in the cryptocurrency space. It plays a crucial role in controlling token value and availability. Without vesting schedules, tokens would flood the market, causing price instability and discouraging long-term holding. Therefore, projects implement vesting schedules to release tokens gradually over time, instead of all at once. This approach ensures price stability, encourages long-term engagement, and helps foster trust within the community. Let’s explore how token vesting in airdrop distributions impacts value, availability, and overall project growth.
$NOT

1. What Is Token Vesting in Airdrop Distributions?
Token vesting refers to the process of gradually releasing airdropped tokens over a specific period. Rather than allowing recipients to access all tokens at once, a vesting schedule locks a portion of the tokens. Only a small percentage becomes available immediately, while the rest unlocks according to the vesting plan.
For example, a project might release 10% of tokens upfront, with the remaining 90% unlocking over the course of a year. This method prevents a large number of tokens from flooding the market all at once, which could crash the price. By controlling the release of tokens, token vesting in airdrop distributions helps maintain market stability and reduces volatility.
$LTC

2. Why Are Vesting Schedules Important in Airdrop Distributions?
Vesting schedules are essential in airdrop distributions because they help manage token supply and prevent price volatility. Releasing all tokens immediately can overwhelm the market, leading to sharp price drops. With a vesting schedule, tokens are released gradually, giving the market time to absorb the new supply. This method helps keep the token’s value more stable over time.
In addition, vesting schedules encourage long-term holding. Users cannot sell all their tokens right away, so they remain invested in the project. This long-term engagement strengthens the community and builds confidence in the project’s future. Moreover, vesting schedules protect early investors by preventing an oversupply that could undercut their investments.
$BNB

3. How Vesting Schedules Impact Token Value
Vesting schedules directly influence token value by regulating how many tokens are entering the market at any given time. When tokens are released too quickly, the market becomes flooded, causing a drop in value. However, when tokens are released gradually, the supply remains controlled, which helps stabilize prices.
For instance, if a project airdrops 1 million tokens but releases them over 12 months, only a fraction of those tokens is available each month. This gradual release prevents price crashes and allows the market to absorb the tokens at a slower pace. Ultimately, vesting schedules help protect the token’s value and ensure the project’s long-term sustainability.
4. Types of Vesting Schedules in Airdrop Distributions
Different types of vesting schedules are used in airdrop distributions to achieve specific goals. Each schedule provides unique benefits depending on the project’s needs and community expectations.
Linear Vesting: Tokens are released in equal portions over time, offering predictability and stability for the project and its users.Cliff Vesting: Tokens are locked for a specific period (the “cliff”) before being released all at once. This method encourages long-term commitment by delaying token availability until a key milestone is reached.Graded Vesting: A portion of tokens is released upfront, while the rest follows a gradual release over time. This approach provides immediate access to some tokens while ensuring long-term engagement as more tokens unlock later.
Choosing the right vesting schedule is critical for the project’s success. A well-designed vesting plan helps regulate token supply, prevent sudden sell-offs, and maintain investor confidence.
5. How Vesting Schedules Affect Token Availability
Vesting schedules limit token availability by locking tokens for a period, meaning they cannot be traded or sold immediately. This controlled availability prevents the market from becoming overwhelmed with new tokens all at once.
Gradual token releases reduce the risk of large-scale sell-offs, which could otherwise cause price crashes. By controlling token availability, the project gives the market time to absorb the new tokens and maintain price stability. Vesting schedules are proving to be a key strategy for ensuring the long-term health of token economies.
Conclusion
Token vesting in airdrop distributions plays a vital role in controlling the value and availability of airdropped tokens. Vesting schedules prevent market flooding, maintain price stability, and encourage long-term holding. By understanding how token vesting works, both project teams and token holders can make informed decisions that contribute to sustainable token ecosystems. In summary, vesting schedules are not just about delaying tokens; they’re about creating trust, fostering engagement, and ensuring long-term project success.
#AirdropAlert #EarnFreeCrypto2024 #Write2Earn #usa #china