Amnis
650 views
3 Discussing
Hot
Latest
Why Slashing Aptos Staking Rewards to 3.79% Could Hurt More Than Help š
#Amnis Finance, a major liquid staking protocol on Aptos, critiques AIP-119, a proposal to cut Aptosā staking rewards from 7% to 3.79%. They argue itās too drastic, potentially damaging validator sustainability, network decentralization, DeFi innovation, and Aptosā appeal compared to other Layer 1s like Solana (6%+) or Ethereum (3-4%). Key risks include: reduced retail and institutional interest, a DeFi TVL collapse due to unprofitable strategies, stifled innovation, validator centralization, and capital flight to higher-yielding chains or even U.S. Treasuries (~5%). Instead, they propose a gradual reduction to 6% over three months (0.33% monthly cuts) to balance inflation control with ecosystem health.
I think Amnis makes a solid case. The 7% APR is a big draw for Aptos, especially as a newer L1 competing with heavyweights. Dropping it to 3.79% feels like pulling the rug out from under validators and DeFi users, risking a domino effectāless staking, weaker DeFi, and capital leaving for greener pastures like Solana or even traditional finance. Their analogy to national interest rates hits the mark: you donāt slash rates in a growing economy unless you want to scare off investors. The gradual 6% plan seems smarterāeases the transition, keeps Aptos competitive, and avoids shocking the ecosystem. That said, the proposalās intent to curb inflation isnāt baseless; itās just the execution that feels rushed. A middle ground makes sense here.
What do you think?
If you enjoy my content, feel free to follow me ā¤ļø
#Binance
#crypto2025
#Amnis Finance, a major liquid staking protocol on Aptos, critiques AIP-119, a proposal to cut Aptosā staking rewards from 7% to 3.79%. They argue itās too drastic, potentially damaging validator sustainability, network decentralization, DeFi innovation, and Aptosā appeal compared to other Layer 1s like Solana (6%+) or Ethereum (3-4%). Key risks include: reduced retail and institutional interest, a DeFi TVL collapse due to unprofitable strategies, stifled innovation, validator centralization, and capital flight to higher-yielding chains or even U.S. Treasuries (~5%). Instead, they propose a gradual reduction to 6% over three months (0.33% monthly cuts) to balance inflation control with ecosystem health.
I think Amnis makes a solid case. The 7% APR is a big draw for Aptos, especially as a newer L1 competing with heavyweights. Dropping it to 3.79% feels like pulling the rug out from under validators and DeFi users, risking a domino effectāless staking, weaker DeFi, and capital leaving for greener pastures like Solana or even traditional finance. Their analogy to national interest rates hits the mark: you donāt slash rates in a growing economy unless you want to scare off investors. The gradual 6% plan seems smarterāeases the transition, keeps Aptos competitive, and avoids shocking the ecosystem. That said, the proposalās intent to curb inflation isnāt baseless; itās just the execution that feels rushed. A middle ground makes sense here.
What do you think?
If you enjoy my content, feel free to follow me ā¤ļø
#Binance
#crypto2025
Login to explore more contents