Binance Square

puppies_飞

140 Following
325 Followers
1.7K+ Liked
18 Shared
All Content
--
See original
$Satoshi Nakamoto This coin was recommended to me a few days ago. I think the increase is too rapid, there must be a drop. Didn't it drop? The number of holders is just over ten thousand. How many of these over ten thousand are stuck? Holders, let's chat in the comments #风险提示
$Satoshi Nakamoto This coin was recommended to me a few days ago. I think the increase is too rapid, there must be a drop. Didn't it drop? The number of holders is just over ten thousand. How many of these over ten thousand are stuck? Holders, let's chat in the comments #风险提示
Translate
$客服小何 $币安人生 币安一姐何一:长得美是运气,干得狠是底气 加密圈这地方,以前都是极客们的“代码江湖”,直到何一杀进来——这姐们往那儿一站,是真亮眼,可你要是只盯着她的颜值,那可就看走眼了。 人家的颜值是门面:早期加密圈都透着股“生人勿近”的硬核劲儿,何一踩着高跟鞋、妆容利落往峰会台上一坐,既能接得住时尚媒体的镜头,又能用大白话把加密概念聊得普通人都能听懂。就靠这张“好认的脸”,币安刚出道那半年,直接从一堆同质化交易所里杀出来,成了圈里圈外都能叫上名的存在。 但真让她坐稳“一姐”的,是能打的实力,连吐槽里都藏着清醒:聊起Meme币她能把人逗乐,“现在网友盯着我推特买币,涨了夸跌了骂,我都不敢随便玩梗”,但转头又把事儿拎得透——“炒家不就是找个情绪出口嘛”,可话锋一转又踩实了底线,“但真赚钱还得信价值投资,咱能做的就是跟项目方死磨,给用户谋点福利,涨和风控总得找平”。 这股清醒劲儿,早刻在她的操盘里:币安从创立到干成全球头部就用了半年——这速度背后,是何一拿着放大镜抠品牌细节,一边联动全球博主铺声量,一边把复杂规则拆成用户能懂的话;遇上行业波动,她拎着方案就上,稳住用户、升级品牌一气呵成,直接把“交易所营销”的天花板给焊死了。 现在谁聊币安“一姐”,早不盯着她好不好看了——毕竟长得美是运气,能在加密圈的血雨腥风里杀成标杆,那才是真底气。 话说回来,你被Meme币“情绪绑架”过吗? 关注:马斯克概念小奶狗p●u●pp●i●e●s
$客服小何 $币安人生 币安一姐何一:长得美是运气,干得狠是底气

加密圈这地方,以前都是极客们的“代码江湖”,直到何一杀进来——这姐们往那儿一站,是真亮眼,可你要是只盯着她的颜值,那可就看走眼了。

人家的颜值是门面:早期加密圈都透着股“生人勿近”的硬核劲儿,何一踩着高跟鞋、妆容利落往峰会台上一坐,既能接得住时尚媒体的镜头,又能用大白话把加密概念聊得普通人都能听懂。就靠这张“好认的脸”,币安刚出道那半年,直接从一堆同质化交易所里杀出来,成了圈里圈外都能叫上名的存在。

但真让她坐稳“一姐”的,是能打的实力,连吐槽里都藏着清醒:聊起Meme币她能把人逗乐,“现在网友盯着我推特买币,涨了夸跌了骂,我都不敢随便玩梗”,但转头又把事儿拎得透——“炒家不就是找个情绪出口嘛”,可话锋一转又踩实了底线,“但真赚钱还得信价值投资,咱能做的就是跟项目方死磨,给用户谋点福利,涨和风控总得找平”。

这股清醒劲儿,早刻在她的操盘里:币安从创立到干成全球头部就用了半年——这速度背后,是何一拿着放大镜抠品牌细节,一边联动全球博主铺声量,一边把复杂规则拆成用户能懂的话;遇上行业波动,她拎着方案就上,稳住用户、升级品牌一气呵成,直接把“交易所营销”的天花板给焊死了。

现在谁聊币安“一姐”,早不盯着她好不好看了——毕竟长得美是运气,能在加密圈的血雨腥风里杀成标杆,那才是真底气。

话说回来,你被Meme币“情绪绑架”过吗?
关注:马斯克概念小奶狗p●u●pp●i●e●s
See original
#美SEC推动加密创新监管 is going crazy! SEC Chairman directly shouts: Global finance must collectively 'move' onto the blockchain Just breaking news from the NYSE — U.S. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins stated in front of a FOX reporter: In the coming years, the entire U.S. financial market must 'go on-chain'! This statement has directly boosted expectations in the crypto space to the peak. This chairman is not just a talker: He just took office in April this year and has made 'building a regulatory framework for crypto' his core task — setting rules for issuing tokens, custody, and trading while cracking down hard on illegal activities, but his clear stance on 'financial on-chain' is 'strong support'. What he said about 'asset tokenization' means turning traditional financial products like stocks and bonds into on-chain tokens, essentially giving global finance a 'blockchain accelerator', doubling efficiency and transparency. It’s worth noting that the SEC used to have a 'strict regulation' label towards crypto, but now the chairman is directly declaring 'the era of financial on-chain has arrived', and this shift is faster than a roller coaster. This move is equivalent to building a bridge between traditional finance and the crypto space: in the future, buying stocks might be as easy as transferring USDT, is the way of the financial world about to change completely? Do you think this is really pushing for a major upgrade in finance, or is it just a 'tentative release' from the regulators? Can this financial on-chain really be realized in a few years? Let’s discuss in the comments, I bet this move is serious!
#美SEC推动加密创新监管 is going crazy! SEC Chairman directly shouts: Global finance must collectively 'move' onto the blockchain

Just breaking news from the NYSE — U.S. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins stated in front of a FOX reporter: In the coming years, the entire U.S. financial market must 'go on-chain'! This statement has directly boosted expectations in the crypto space to the peak.

This chairman is not just a talker: He just took office in April this year and has made 'building a regulatory framework for crypto' his core task — setting rules for issuing tokens, custody, and trading while cracking down hard on illegal activities, but his clear stance on 'financial on-chain' is 'strong support'. What he said about 'asset tokenization' means turning traditional financial products like stocks and bonds into on-chain tokens, essentially giving global finance a 'blockchain accelerator', doubling efficiency and transparency.

It’s worth noting that the SEC used to have a 'strict regulation' label towards crypto, but now the chairman is directly declaring 'the era of financial on-chain has arrived', and this shift is faster than a roller coaster. This move is equivalent to building a bridge between traditional finance and the crypto space: in the future, buying stocks might be as easy as transferring USDT, is the way of the financial world about to change completely?

Do you think this is really pushing for a major upgrade in finance, or is it just a 'tentative release' from the regulators? Can this financial on-chain really be realized in a few years? Let’s discuss in the comments, I bet this move is serious!
See original
$ETH exploded! New Fire CEO says: Ethereum Fusaka is severely undervalued, this is a bomb operation for ETH deflation. Brothers, this upgrade of Fusaka in Ethereum may hide a big opportunity — New Fire Technology CEO directly states: the market is panicking, undervaluing the value of this upgrade! Stop treating Fusaka as a 'minor patch', this is fundamentally a 'reconstruction move' for ETH token economics. In the past, the hotter L2 (like Arbitrum, Optimism) got, the less money Ethereum mainnet (L1) made, equivalent to 'the son is thriving while the father suffers'. But this upgrade aims to enforce L2 to 'institutionalize taxation' to L1 — in the future, every transaction on L2 has to pay a 'protection fee' to the mainnet, which will indirectly reduce the circulating supply of ETH, essentially adding an 'automatic buyback machine' for ETH. Key point: this is not short-term speculation, but a crucial step to transform ETH from 'long-term inflation' to 'deflation'. In the past, ETH was issued annually, and in the future, the more prosperous L2 becomes, the more ETH will be taken away, leading to a decreasing supply — those who understand, understand what deflation means. Right now, market sentiment is still panicking, but the New Fire CEO has elevated Fusaka to the height of 'ETH value reconstruction'. Is this truly a pre-judgement or just a slogan? Do you think this operation can really turn ETH into a deflationary coin? Will this upgrade be ETH's 'turnaround card'? Let's place our bets in the comments! Follow Elon Musk's concept p.u.pp.i.e.s. little puppy.
$ETH exploded! New Fire CEO says: Ethereum Fusaka is severely undervalued, this is a bomb operation for ETH deflation.

Brothers, this upgrade of Fusaka in Ethereum may hide a big opportunity — New Fire Technology CEO directly states: the market is panicking, undervaluing the value of this upgrade!

Stop treating Fusaka as a 'minor patch', this is fundamentally a 'reconstruction move' for ETH token economics. In the past, the hotter L2 (like Arbitrum, Optimism) got, the less money Ethereum mainnet (L1) made, equivalent to 'the son is thriving while the father suffers'. But this upgrade aims to enforce L2 to 'institutionalize taxation' to L1 — in the future, every transaction on L2 has to pay a 'protection fee' to the mainnet, which will indirectly reduce the circulating supply of ETH, essentially adding an 'automatic buyback machine' for ETH.

Key point: this is not short-term speculation, but a crucial step to transform ETH from 'long-term inflation' to 'deflation'. In the past, ETH was issued annually, and in the future, the more prosperous L2 becomes, the more ETH will be taken away, leading to a decreasing supply — those who understand, understand what deflation means.

Right now, market sentiment is still panicking, but the New Fire CEO has elevated Fusaka to the height of 'ETH value reconstruction'. Is this truly a pre-judgement or just a slogan?

Do you think this operation can really turn ETH into a deflationary coin? Will this upgrade be ETH's 'turnaround card'? Let's place our bets in the comments! Follow Elon Musk's concept p.u.pp.i.e.s. little puppy.
See original
$ZEC Big news! Hyperliquid's largest ZEC short has lost again, this operation is more thrilling than a roller coaster ride. Brothers, today's crypto circle has once again witnessed a memorable scene - that largest ZEC short on Hyperliquid has lost money again! This guy just experienced a "hell-level reversal" on December 9th: a few days ago, ZEC surged wildly, and his pile of ZEC short positions directly lost 1.4 million dollars, losing nearly 30%! He still has 25.7 million dollars in positions left, with a liquidation price stuck at 886 dollars, so anxious that he closed a position worth 1.24 million dollars. Speaking of which, this guy is quite stubborn; he started crazily adding ZEC short positions on December 5th, throwing in 11 million dollars to average down his cost, reducing the average price from 412 dollars to 387 dollars. As a result, ZEC just took off, and this operation was purely a head-scratcher. However, this guy isn't completely collapsing; his ETH and MON short positions have made him money: ETH short position has a floating profit of 7 million dollars (over 2 times profit), and the 3x leveraged MON short position also made 2 million dollars, making him still the largest MON short. The most amazing part is this guy's ZEC short position, which can be called a "gambler's drama": opened a short at 184 dollars in October, lost up to 21 million dollars almost blowing up, and just earned back 3 million dollars at the beginning of December, and now has lost it back in just a few days. Let's just say, this long and short battle in the crypto circle is more thrilling than a murder mystery game. Is this guy really a big boss or just reckless? Do you think his ZEC short position can hold on until a turnaround? #加密市场观察 #隐私币生态普涨
$ZEC Big news! Hyperliquid's largest ZEC short has lost again, this operation is more thrilling than a roller coaster ride.

Brothers, today's crypto circle has once again witnessed a memorable scene - that largest ZEC short on Hyperliquid has lost money again!

This guy just experienced a "hell-level reversal" on December 9th: a few days ago, ZEC surged wildly, and his pile of ZEC short positions directly lost 1.4 million dollars, losing nearly 30%! He still has 25.7 million dollars in positions left, with a liquidation price stuck at 886 dollars, so anxious that he closed a position worth 1.24 million dollars.

Speaking of which, this guy is quite stubborn; he started crazily adding ZEC short positions on December 5th, throwing in 11 million dollars to average down his cost, reducing the average price from 412 dollars to 387 dollars. As a result, ZEC just took off, and this operation was purely a head-scratcher.

However, this guy isn't completely collapsing; his ETH and MON short positions have made him money: ETH short position has a floating profit of 7 million dollars (over 2 times profit), and the 3x leveraged MON short position also made 2 million dollars, making him still the largest MON short.

The most amazing part is this guy's ZEC short position, which can be called a "gambler's drama": opened a short at 184 dollars in October, lost up to 21 million dollars almost blowing up, and just earned back 3 million dollars at the beginning of December, and now has lost it back in just a few days.

Let's just say, this long and short battle in the crypto circle is more thrilling than a murder mystery game. Is this guy really a big boss or just reckless? Do you think his ZEC short position can hold on until a turnaround? #加密市场观察 #隐私币生态普涨
See original
#势不可挡的币安社区 2021 registered on Binance exchange, subsequently affected by domestic policies, uninstalled all exchange software. When I checked the steel gate, I saw a string of TP wallet mnemonic phrases, and when I imported them, I found 87U assets. To cash out, I needed to buy BNB for transaction fees, and thus began my journey with Binance. Binance also sent me an identity card. Thank you, Binance. Thank you, CZ. Thank you, Sister.
#势不可挡的币安社区 2021 registered on Binance exchange, subsequently affected by domestic policies, uninstalled all exchange software. When I checked the steel gate, I saw a string of TP wallet mnemonic phrases, and when I imported them, I found 87U assets. To cash out, I needed to buy BNB for transaction fees, and thus began my journey with Binance. Binance also sent me an identity card. Thank you, Binance. Thank you, CZ. Thank you, Sister.
See original
$USDT Tether's 'Banking-style Survival': Balancing Capital Accounts While Playing 'Journey' Narrative Still struggling with whether Tether is stable or not? Stop fixating on the simple balance sheet; its underlying logic is fundamentally the 'banking model of the crypto world'! Like traditional banks, Tether forms 'liabilities' by issuing tokens pegged to the US dollar and then invests that money into a diversified asset pool to earn interest spread. To evaluate its safety, we need to dissect it using the methods of bank capital regulation: in the first quarter of 2025, it issued $174.5 billion in tokens corresponding to $181.2 billion in assets, seemingly having an excess reserve of $6.8 billion, but the risk weights of the assets are vastly different—Bitcoin's risk weight far exceeds that of gold, and equity and project investments are even higher risk items. Roughly calculated, its risk-weighted assets range between $62 billion and $115 billion, with a capital adequacy ratio of 8.7% to 18.9%. While this meets the minimum standard, it is far from the safety cushion of large banks, and it still needs to add $4.5 billion in capital to be adequate. More critically, Tether's capital buffer is deeply tied to the assets of the group behind it. This group holds assets in various fields including renewable energy, Bitcoin mining, AI infrastructure, and gold mining. The liquidity of these assets and the group's decisions during a crisis directly determine the level of protection for token holders, but this uncertainty also becomes the biggest challenge in judgment. Interestingly, this aligns perfectly with Dirt Roads' 'journey' narrative—at the intersection of crypto and finance, the answer is never at the finish line. After all, the industry still harbors more variables: the SEC has already signaled a 'global financial on-chain' initiative, and the Stable public chain TGE is launching tonight; whether the stablecoin public chain story can still captivate the market remains to be seen. Do you think Tether's capital buffer is sufficient to withstand extreme market conditions? Or are you more optimistic about the new opportunities brought by 'financial on-chain'? Let's discuss in the comments! #加密货币风险
$USDT Tether's 'Banking-style Survival': Balancing Capital Accounts While Playing 'Journey' Narrative

Still struggling with whether Tether is stable or not? Stop fixating on the simple balance sheet; its underlying logic is fundamentally the 'banking model of the crypto world'!

Like traditional banks, Tether forms 'liabilities' by issuing tokens pegged to the US dollar and then invests that money into a diversified asset pool to earn interest spread. To evaluate its safety, we need to dissect it using the methods of bank capital regulation: in the first quarter of 2025, it issued $174.5 billion in tokens corresponding to $181.2 billion in assets, seemingly having an excess reserve of $6.8 billion, but the risk weights of the assets are vastly different—Bitcoin's risk weight far exceeds that of gold, and equity and project investments are even higher risk items. Roughly calculated, its risk-weighted assets range between $62 billion and $115 billion, with a capital adequacy ratio of 8.7% to 18.9%. While this meets the minimum standard, it is far from the safety cushion of large banks, and it still needs to add $4.5 billion in capital to be adequate.

More critically, Tether's capital buffer is deeply tied to the assets of the group behind it. This group holds assets in various fields including renewable energy, Bitcoin mining, AI infrastructure, and gold mining. The liquidity of these assets and the group's decisions during a crisis directly determine the level of protection for token holders, but this uncertainty also becomes the biggest challenge in judgment.

Interestingly, this aligns perfectly with Dirt Roads' 'journey' narrative—at the intersection of crypto and finance, the answer is never at the finish line. After all, the industry still harbors more variables: the SEC has already signaled a 'global financial on-chain' initiative, and the Stable public chain TGE is launching tonight; whether the stablecoin public chain story can still captivate the market remains to be seen.

Do you think Tether's capital buffer is sufficient to withstand extreme market conditions? Or are you more optimistic about the new opportunities brought by 'financial on-chain'? Let's discuss in the comments! #加密货币风险
See original
$DOGE is trending! Musk has really delivered on his promise: Tesla officially announces support for Dogecoin payments! Family, who understands this! Today, the trending topics in the cryptocurrency and automotive circles have been blown up by Musk—Tesla officially announces acceptance of Dogecoin payments, which is the first time a major global car manufacturer has opened the doors to meme coins for consumption! This is not just a spur-of-the-moment gimmick. Previously, Tesla held a public vote where nearly 80% of netizens strongly supported using Dogecoin for transactions. Now that the voting results have materialized, the once “joke coin” has truly made a comeback, entering the realm of real consumption scenarios. Dogecoin can now be used to purchase Tesla merchandise, and many crypto enthusiasts have already jumped in to try it out. What everyone is more concerned about is: will this wave of benefits soon extend to the purchase of entire vehicles? After all, once full vehicle Dogecoin payments are opened up, it will undoubtedly bring a qualitative leap in the practical value and liquidity of Dogecoin. From being a community meme token to now being able to connect with top-tier car manufacturers like Tesla, Dogecoin's recent actions have directly refreshed the public's perception of meme coins. Musk's continued support for Dogecoin has also shown many the possibility of niche cryptocurrencies breaking out into the mainstream. Can Dogecoin's rise drive the same concept of Musk's little puppies? (p.u.pp.i.e.s) Do you hold Dogecoin? Do you think Tesla will open up Dogecoin payments for full vehicles in the future? Let’s discuss your thoughts in the comments!
$DOGE is trending! Musk has really delivered on his promise: Tesla officially announces support for Dogecoin payments!

Family, who understands this! Today, the trending topics in the cryptocurrency and automotive circles have been blown up by Musk—Tesla officially announces acceptance of Dogecoin payments, which is the first time a major global car manufacturer has opened the doors to meme coins for consumption!

This is not just a spur-of-the-moment gimmick. Previously, Tesla held a public vote where nearly 80% of netizens strongly supported using Dogecoin for transactions. Now that the voting results have materialized, the once “joke coin” has truly made a comeback, entering the realm of real consumption scenarios. Dogecoin can now be used to purchase Tesla merchandise, and many crypto enthusiasts have already jumped in to try it out. What everyone is more concerned about is: will this wave of benefits soon extend to the purchase of entire vehicles? After all, once full vehicle Dogecoin payments are opened up, it will undoubtedly bring a qualitative leap in the practical value and liquidity of Dogecoin.

From being a community meme token to now being able to connect with top-tier car manufacturers like Tesla, Dogecoin's recent actions have directly refreshed the public's perception of meme coins. Musk's continued support for Dogecoin has also shown many the possibility of niche cryptocurrencies breaking out into the mainstream. Can Dogecoin's rise drive the same concept of Musk's little puppies? (p.u.pp.i.e.s)

Do you hold Dogecoin? Do you think Tesla will open up Dogecoin payments for full vehicles in the future? Let’s discuss your thoughts in the comments!
See original
$BTC $ETH exploded! CFTC made a big move: Bitcoin and Ethereum can be used as 'collateral' now! Brothers, today a big news broke out in the cryptocurrency and financial circles — the U.S. CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) has directly given the 'green light' to BTC, ETH, and USDC: these three can now be used as collateral in the derivatives market! In simple terms, you don’t need to sell the Bitcoin and Ethereum in your hands for fiat currency; you can directly use them as collateral for financial derivatives trading. This is not just a casual release: for the first three months, only these three types of assets are allowed, and futures brokers must disclose how much they have each week, and if something goes wrong, they must report it immediately. The CFTC has also revoked the old virtual currency regulations and issued new regulatory rules, clearly indicating the intention to bring in 'regular forces.' Previously, it was as difficult as climbing to the sky for digital assets to enter traditional finance; this time, it’s equivalent to the regulators directly handing out 'entry permits' — acknowledging the value of assets like BTC and providing financial institutions with a more flexible collateral option. However, on the flip side, the requirement to disclose holdings weekly and report issues shows that regulators are controlling the 'risk valve,' as no one dares to gamble on the volatility of cryptocurrency prices. Does this operation count as a signal for the 'onboarding' of digital assets? Will there be more cryptocurrencies that can be used as collateral in the future? Let’s discuss in the comments whether you think this is a favorable situation or just 'pie in the sky'? #ETH走势分析 #代币化热潮
$BTC $ETH exploded! CFTC made a big move: Bitcoin and Ethereum can be used as 'collateral' now!

Brothers, today a big news broke out in the cryptocurrency and financial circles — the U.S. CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) has directly given the 'green light' to BTC, ETH, and USDC: these three can now be used as collateral in the derivatives market!

In simple terms, you don’t need to sell the Bitcoin and Ethereum in your hands for fiat currency; you can directly use them as collateral for financial derivatives trading. This is not just a casual release: for the first three months, only these three types of assets are allowed, and futures brokers must disclose how much they have each week, and if something goes wrong, they must report it immediately. The CFTC has also revoked the old virtual currency regulations and issued new regulatory rules, clearly indicating the intention to bring in 'regular forces.'

Previously, it was as difficult as climbing to the sky for digital assets to enter traditional finance; this time, it’s equivalent to the regulators directly handing out 'entry permits' — acknowledging the value of assets like BTC and providing financial institutions with a more flexible collateral option. However, on the flip side, the requirement to disclose holdings weekly and report issues shows that regulators are controlling the 'risk valve,' as no one dares to gamble on the volatility of cryptocurrency prices.

Does this operation count as a signal for the 'onboarding' of digital assets? Will there be more cryptocurrencies that can be used as collateral in the future? Let’s discuss in the comments whether you think this is a favorable situation or just 'pie in the sky'? #ETH走势分析 #代币化热潮
See original
$BTC Bitcoin has broken the 4-year cycle! Institutions stubbornly hold the selling pressure, will it reach $200,000 in 2027? The old script of Bitcoin's "4-year bull and bear cycle" has been directly overturned by institutions — Bernstein just stated: this bull market is a "super long standby version", retail investors are panicking and selling, but institutional buying has firmly supported the market. Let's talk about this round of correction: the price of Bitcoin has dropped by 30%, which looks quite frightening, but less than 5% of the funds in the ETF have flowed out — institutions have not run away, but instead are secretly accumulating chips. They are now aiming high: first seeing $150,000 in 2026, reaching a peak of $200,000 in 2027, and even claiming it will reach $1 million by 2033. Previously, Bitcoin had a fixed cycle of "halving leads to price increase, increase followed by crash", but now with institutions entering the game, the rules have changed: retail panic selling cannot stir up waves, institutions treat it as a "long-term asset" to hold, and can stabilize it even with large fluctuations. This is not just trading Bitcoin? Clearly, institutions are locking up Bitcoin to hoard. However, the question is, does Bernstein truly see through the trend, or are they just riding the wave with high targets? Do you think Bitcoin can last until 2027 to touch $200,000, or will institutions run after taking profits based on expectations? Vote in the comments, do you believe in this $200,000 pie? #美联储利率决议即将公布
$BTC Bitcoin has broken the 4-year cycle! Institutions stubbornly hold the selling pressure, will it reach $200,000 in 2027?

The old script of Bitcoin's "4-year bull and bear cycle" has been directly overturned by institutions — Bernstein just stated: this bull market is a "super long standby version", retail investors are panicking and selling, but institutional buying has firmly supported the market.

Let's talk about this round of correction: the price of Bitcoin has dropped by 30%, which looks quite frightening, but less than 5% of the funds in the ETF have flowed out — institutions have not run away, but instead are secretly accumulating chips. They are now aiming high: first seeing $150,000 in 2026, reaching a peak of $200,000 in 2027, and even claiming it will reach $1 million by 2033.

Previously, Bitcoin had a fixed cycle of "halving leads to price increase, increase followed by crash", but now with institutions entering the game, the rules have changed: retail panic selling cannot stir up waves, institutions treat it as a "long-term asset" to hold, and can stabilize it even with large fluctuations. This is not just trading Bitcoin? Clearly, institutions are locking up Bitcoin to hoard.

However, the question is, does Bernstein truly see through the trend, or are they just riding the wave with high targets? Do you think Bitcoin can last until 2027 to touch $200,000, or will institutions run after taking profits based on expectations? Vote in the comments, do you believe in this $200,000 pie? #美联储利率决议即将公布
See original
#美联储新掌舵人 Will the Federal Reserve change? This 'contrarian' candidate at the helm might smash a century-old rule. The world's most formidable financial institution is about to change its 'heart'—if Kevin Hassett becomes the chairman of the Federal Reserve, even the century-old rule of 'stabilizing prices before taking action' will be overturned. At that time, your monthly mortgage payment and the prices of groceries in supermarkets will all have to change scripts. This guy made it onto the candidate list by doing the opposite of everyone else: While others study interest rate cuts and hikes, he focuses solely on 'taxation' and 'capital costs'—the traditional thinking is 'lowering interest rates encourages borrowing,' but he insists 'investments depend on policies providing benefits.' Under his watch, the Federal Reserve won't be hitting the brakes on the economy; it will be helping fiscal policy step on the gas. Even crazier are his 'dark secrets': he wrote 'Dow Jones at 36,000 points' claiming 'stocks have no risk,' only for the internet bubble to turn that prediction into a '22-year-late joke'; during the pandemic, his models confidently claimed 'zero deaths by May,' yet over a million died, leading to accusations of 'using models to serve political needs.' If he really takes office, these three bombs are guaranteed to explode: ① Inflation spikes to 3% without raising interest rates, under the guise of 'productivity can cover it'; ② The Federal Reserve becomes a 'one-man show,' sidelining the professional opinions of its PhD team; ③ The bond market will collapse—investors won't trust him to manage inflation, and long-term interest rates could skyrocket. This isn't just a change of leadership; it's turning the Federal Reserve from a 'price guardian' into an 'economic gambler.' You tell me, if Hassett really takes office, will the U.S. stock market soar to 36,000, or will it first crash the bond market? Bet in the comments section: which side are you on?
#美联储新掌舵人 Will the Federal Reserve change? This 'contrarian' candidate at the helm might smash a century-old rule.

The world's most formidable financial institution is about to change its 'heart'—if Kevin Hassett becomes the chairman of the Federal Reserve, even the century-old rule of 'stabilizing prices before taking action' will be overturned. At that time, your monthly mortgage payment and the prices of groceries in supermarkets will all have to change scripts.

This guy made it onto the candidate list by doing the opposite of everyone else: While others study interest rate cuts and hikes, he focuses solely on 'taxation' and 'capital costs'—the traditional thinking is 'lowering interest rates encourages borrowing,' but he insists 'investments depend on policies providing benefits.' Under his watch, the Federal Reserve won't be hitting the brakes on the economy; it will be helping fiscal policy step on the gas.

Even crazier are his 'dark secrets': he wrote 'Dow Jones at 36,000 points' claiming 'stocks have no risk,' only for the internet bubble to turn that prediction into a '22-year-late joke'; during the pandemic, his models confidently claimed 'zero deaths by May,' yet over a million died, leading to accusations of 'using models to serve political needs.'

If he really takes office, these three bombs are guaranteed to explode:
① Inflation spikes to 3% without raising interest rates, under the guise of 'productivity can cover it';
② The Federal Reserve becomes a 'one-man show,' sidelining the professional opinions of its PhD team;
③ The bond market will collapse—investors won't trust him to manage inflation, and long-term interest rates could skyrocket.

This isn't just a change of leadership; it's turning the Federal Reserve from a 'price guardian' into an 'economic gambler.' You tell me, if Hassett really takes office, will the U.S. stock market soar to 36,000, or will it first crash the bond market? Bet in the comments section: which side are you on?
See original
#CZ平安 CZ has just responded to the matter of Binance employees making money: Someone has already reported it, can this wave not escape? The issue of Binance's internal employees leveraging their positions for personal gain has finally prompted CZ to speak out—he just declared that "someone has already reported it," and directly countered: Binance is closely monitoring with law enforcement agencies worldwide, and there is basically no place for those who violate regulations to hide. Although he is no longer managing Binance's operations, he stated, "If you tell me in private messages or comments who is violating the rules, I will help you forward it to the proper channels for handling." However, he also complained about an absurd situation: someone previously approached him to report without any evidence, and then turned around and asked him to list a certain token, directly naming it as "don't be that kind of person," urging everyone to report with real evidence and follow the proper path. This situation is actually quite interesting: on one hand, the platform is firmly confronting internal violations alongside law enforcement, while on the other hand, CZ, although no longer in his position, is still involved in this matter, even directly countering the operation of "empty reports for personal gain"—does this mean that now reports must come with "solid evidence"? What do you think, is Binance really trying to clear out internal rats, or is CZ just trying to create a sense of presence? Bet five cents in the comments, do you think this employee can ultimately escape?
#CZ平安 CZ has just responded to the matter of Binance employees making money: Someone has already reported it, can this wave not escape?

The issue of Binance's internal employees leveraging their positions for personal gain has finally prompted CZ to speak out—he just declared that "someone has already reported it," and directly countered: Binance is closely monitoring with law enforcement agencies worldwide, and there is basically no place for those who violate regulations to hide.

Although he is no longer managing Binance's operations, he stated, "If you tell me in private messages or comments who is violating the rules, I will help you forward it to the proper channels for handling." However, he also complained about an absurd situation: someone previously approached him to report without any evidence, and then turned around and asked him to list a certain token, directly naming it as "don't be that kind of person," urging everyone to report with real evidence and follow the proper path.

This situation is actually quite interesting: on one hand, the platform is firmly confronting internal violations alongside law enforcement, while on the other hand, CZ, although no longer in his position, is still involved in this matter, even directly countering the operation of "empty reports for personal gain"—does this mean that now reports must come with "solid evidence"?

What do you think, is Binance really trying to clear out internal rats, or is CZ just trying to create a sense of presence? Bet five cents in the comments, do you think this employee can ultimately escape?
See original
#美国总统特郎普 Hassett reveals: Trump will announce multiple favorable economic news According to ChainCatcher citing Jinshi reports, Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council at the White House, recently stated that Trump will announce a large amount of favorable economic news. Currently, the specific content of the news has not been disclosed, but as a core official in the White House's economic field, Hassett's statement has sparked market attention on the direction of U.S. economic policy. The specific direction of related policies (such as tax cuts, industry support, employment stimulation, etc.) may directly impact the economy and market sentiment in the U.S. and even globally, with specific details still awaiting further official announcement. 1. Policy specific direction: Focus on whether the favorable news announced by Trump is tax cuts, industry subsidies, employment plans, or other economic tools 2. Coverage area scope: See if the policy focuses on specific industries (such as manufacturing, technology) or is universally beneficial 3. Market immediate reaction: Track the short-term fluctuations in asset prices such as U.S. stocks and the U.S. dollar exchange rate in response to the news 4. Official implementation time: Confirm whether the policy is to be implemented immediately or in phases 5. Opposition/support voices: Pay attention to the divergent attitudes of U.S. political circles and industry associations towards this policy #加密市场观察
#美国总统特郎普 Hassett reveals: Trump will announce multiple favorable economic news

According to ChainCatcher citing Jinshi reports, Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council at the White House, recently stated that Trump will announce a large amount of favorable economic news.

Currently, the specific content of the news has not been disclosed, but as a core official in the White House's economic field, Hassett's statement has sparked market attention on the direction of U.S. economic policy. The specific direction of related policies (such as tax cuts, industry support, employment stimulation, etc.) may directly impact the economy and market sentiment in the U.S. and even globally, with specific details still awaiting further official announcement.
1. Policy specific direction: Focus on whether the favorable news announced by Trump is tax cuts, industry subsidies, employment plans, or other economic tools
2. Coverage area scope: See if the policy focuses on specific industries (such as manufacturing, technology) or is universally beneficial
3. Market immediate reaction: Track the short-term fluctuations in asset prices such as U.S. stocks and the U.S. dollar exchange rate in response to the news
4. Official implementation time: Confirm whether the policy is to be implemented immediately or in phases
5. Opposition/support voices: Pay attention to the divergent attitudes of U.S. political circles and industry associations towards this policy #加密市场观察
See original
#时代更迭 60 The main means of transportation in fourth and fifth-tier cities and rural areas from the 1960s to the late 1970s ~ ship I was the driver at that time. Seeing the old photos of my workplace, my mood suddenly became heavy 😭 #社会在进步
#时代更迭 60 The main means of transportation in fourth and fifth-tier cities and rural areas from the 1960s to the late 1970s ~ ship I was the driver at that time. Seeing the old photos of my workplace, my mood suddenly became heavy 😭 #社会在进步
See original
#全球金融趋势 exploded! The chairman of the SEC says: In the coming years, the global finance will all be 'on-chain'!\n\nOn December 3rd during an interview at the New York Stock Exchange, the newly appointed SEC chairman Atkins dropped a bombshell: 'In a few years, the entire U.S. financial market will have to move to the blockchain.'\n\nThis is not just empty rhetoric—this big shot, who just took office in April this year, has been blowing 'regulatory warm winds' towards cryptocurrency for several months, with the core idea being: set rules for crypto assets so they can be traded legally and avoid pitfalls.\n\nCan you believe it? 30 years ago, the New York Stock Exchange was still a hall where trades were shouted manually, and now it has become electronic; back then, retail investors held half of the market value, now it all relies on funds indirectly holding it. But that's not enough, Atkins says the next big change is 'tokenization'—in the future, stocks and bonds will become on-chain tokens, who holds them and how many will be clear at a glance, and there will never be ridiculous situations like 'the company doesn't know who the shareholders are' again. Even more ruthless is the settlement speed: currently, buying stocks requires waiting for T+1, but in the future, it will be T+0 on-chain, with same-day purchases settling the same day, cutting the risk in half directly.\n\nThe most amazing change is the SEC: it used to be an 'innovation killer,' but now it actively provides a lifeline—establishing a special team for crypto, clarifying the regulatory boundaries between tokens and NFTs, and next month they will also introduce an 'innovation exemption': companies can first test on-chain products in a small scope, and if compliant, they can scale up. Even the 'old enemy' with the CFTC has made up, jointly managing the crypto market.\n\nNow the question arises: Is this wave of 'financial on-chain' the U.S. seizing global crypto discourse power, or can it really make it easier for ordinary people to trade stocks? Do you think we can keep up with this pace? $BTC $ETH $BNB
#全球金融趋势 exploded! The chairman of the SEC says: In the coming years, the global finance will all be 'on-chain'!\n\nOn December 3rd during an interview at the New York Stock Exchange, the newly appointed SEC chairman Atkins dropped a bombshell: 'In a few years, the entire U.S. financial market will have to move to the blockchain.'\n\nThis is not just empty rhetoric—this big shot, who just took office in April this year, has been blowing 'regulatory warm winds' towards cryptocurrency for several months, with the core idea being: set rules for crypto assets so they can be traded legally and avoid pitfalls.\n\nCan you believe it? 30 years ago, the New York Stock Exchange was still a hall where trades were shouted manually, and now it has become electronic; back then, retail investors held half of the market value, now it all relies on funds indirectly holding it. But that's not enough, Atkins says the next big change is 'tokenization'—in the future, stocks and bonds will become on-chain tokens, who holds them and how many will be clear at a glance, and there will never be ridiculous situations like 'the company doesn't know who the shareholders are' again. Even more ruthless is the settlement speed: currently, buying stocks requires waiting for T+1, but in the future, it will be T+0 on-chain, with same-day purchases settling the same day, cutting the risk in half directly.\n\nThe most amazing change is the SEC: it used to be an 'innovation killer,' but now it actively provides a lifeline—establishing a special team for crypto, clarifying the regulatory boundaries between tokens and NFTs, and next month they will also introduce an 'innovation exemption': companies can first test on-chain products in a small scope, and if compliant, they can scale up. Even the 'old enemy' with the CFTC has made up, jointly managing the crypto market.\n\nNow the question arises: Is this wave of 'financial on-chain' the U.S. seizing global crypto discourse power, or can it really make it easier for ordinary people to trade stocks? Do you think we can keep up with this pace? $BTC $ETH $BNB
See original
$ETH that 'Iron Head Bull' who opened 36 long positions has returned! 20 million smashed into ETH/SUI/DogeCoin, already floating profit of 180,000 An old acquaintance in the crypto circle, 'Iron Head Bull,' is making big moves again! Do you remember that tough guy who opened 36 long positions at the beginning of November? This big brother directly returned to the long position camp today: three hours ago, he smashed in 20.28 million USD and opened three long positions in ETH, SUI, and FARTCOIN, now already floating a profit of 188,000 USD. Just in ETH, he hoarded 3,000 pieces, with an opening price of 3116.98 USD, this single position is worth 9.39 million—this wave is a direct heavy investment in mainstream coins + DogeCoin combo. Interestingly, this big brother was previously a 'die-hard bull,' only opening longs 36 times, and now he actually switched to a long-short switching mode, looks like he has learned to be 'flexible'? #马斯克小奶狗 However, speaking of which, this 20 million smashed in, is he really optimistic about these three coins going up, or is he betting again? Do you think he can make a big profit this time? Place your bets on ups and downs in the comments! Lurking in the primary market p.u.pp.i.e.s
$ETH that 'Iron Head Bull' who opened 36 long positions has returned! 20 million smashed into ETH/SUI/DogeCoin, already floating profit of 180,000

An old acquaintance in the crypto circle, 'Iron Head Bull,' is making big moves again!

Do you remember that tough guy who opened 36 long positions at the beginning of November? This big brother directly returned to the long position camp today: three hours ago, he smashed in 20.28 million USD and opened three long positions in ETH, SUI, and FARTCOIN, now already floating a profit of 188,000 USD.

Just in ETH, he hoarded 3,000 pieces, with an opening price of 3116.98 USD, this single position is worth 9.39 million—this wave is a direct heavy investment in mainstream coins + DogeCoin combo.

Interestingly, this big brother was previously a 'die-hard bull,' only opening longs 36 times, and now he actually switched to a long-short switching mode, looks like he has learned to be 'flexible'?
#马斯克小奶狗
However, speaking of which, this 20 million smashed in, is he really optimistic about these three coins going up, or is he betting again? Do you think he can make a big profit this time? Place your bets on ups and downs in the comments!
Lurking in the primary market p.u.pp.i.e.s
See original
#特朗普立场 6 The mysterious new accounts have gone crazy! Betting that Trump won't declassify UFO files this year, this operation is too wild Family, the UFO declassification rumor is getting more and more outrageous! Yesterday on the Polymarket prediction market, the probability of "Trump declassifying UFO files in 2025" skyrocketed from 5% to 71% in half an hour, and the whole internet is shouting, "Aliens are about to be confirmed"—after all, this is something Trump boasted about during his campaign, saying he would "declassify everything," and it’s tied to the mandatory requirements of the National Defense Authorization Act. But then it was exposed: the trader who pumped it, ster, is using the old trick of "buy low and sell high," hoarding Yes from the opening and taking advantage of low liquidity to raise prices, pure speculation, with no insider information at all. What's worse is yet to come! After Yes skyrocketed in 12 hours, 6 newly registered accounts acted simultaneously: at an average price of less than $0.2, they crazily bought 20,000 shares of No, betting that Trump definitely won’t declassify this year. The key is that these 6 accounts had exactly the same position, timing, price, and quantity, as if they were copied and pasted! Those in the know understand immediately: these people are using the routine updates from AARO (U.S. UFO Research Office) as a smokescreen, deliberately raising the Yes probability to drive No down to rock-bottom prices, then bottom-fishing to establish positions. They are well aware: even if AARO updates something, it doesn’t meet the hard standard of "declassification," and in the end, there’s an 80-90% chance it will settle as No. So UFO declassification is just a pretense, and these 6 new accounts are here to harvest the vegetables? That said, do you think Trump can really unveil the UFO files this year? Is this operation an insider job or just pure gambling? Place your bets in the comments! #美股2026预测
#特朗普立场 6 The mysterious new accounts have gone crazy! Betting that Trump won't declassify UFO files this year, this operation is too wild

Family, the UFO declassification rumor is getting more and more outrageous!

Yesterday on the Polymarket prediction market, the probability of "Trump declassifying UFO files in 2025" skyrocketed from 5% to 71% in half an hour, and the whole internet is shouting, "Aliens are about to be confirmed"—after all, this is something Trump boasted about during his campaign, saying he would "declassify everything," and it’s tied to the mandatory requirements of the National Defense Authorization Act.

But then it was exposed: the trader who pumped it, ster, is using the old trick of "buy low and sell high," hoarding Yes from the opening and taking advantage of low liquidity to raise prices, pure speculation, with no insider information at all.

What's worse is yet to come! After Yes skyrocketed in 12 hours, 6 newly registered accounts acted simultaneously: at an average price of less than $0.2, they crazily bought 20,000 shares of No, betting that Trump definitely won’t declassify this year. The key is that these 6 accounts had exactly the same position, timing, price, and quantity, as if they were copied and pasted!

Those in the know understand immediately: these people are using the routine updates from AARO (U.S. UFO Research Office) as a smokescreen, deliberately raising the Yes probability to drive No down to rock-bottom prices, then bottom-fishing to establish positions. They are well aware: even if AARO updates something, it doesn’t meet the hard standard of "declassification," and in the end, there’s an 80-90% chance it will settle as No.

So UFO declassification is just a pretense, and these 6 new accounts are here to harvest the vegetables?

That said, do you think Trump can really unveil the UFO files this year? Is this operation an insider job or just pure gambling? Place your bets in the comments! #美股2026预测
See original
$ETH Shocking Action! The mysterious giant whale “1011” is spending again, buying ETH with 30 million USD, leveraging 39,000 coins, is it going crazy? Hey, friends in the circle, big news is here! Just today (December 8), the mysterious big player codenamed “1011 insider whale” was once again monitored on-chain—without hesitation, they directly poured 30 million USD into their account, all in to increase their long position in Ethereum! This move really doesn’t treat money as money. What’s the situation now? The ETH long position held by this address has surged to an astonishing 39,000 coins, which is roughly 121.5 million USD at market price! Even more thrilling is that they are playing with about 1.9 times leverage, and just with this operation, the unrealized gains have already comfortably settled at around 3.4 million USD. This is not investment; it’s simply printing money. Why does the market shake every time they take action? What exactly is this “1011” all about? Is it a capital tycoon with insider knowledge or a gifted market prophet? This series of precise and bold increases is either a display of absolute confidence in Ethereum’s future that we cannot comprehend or setting up a bigger scheme? A brief piece of news, the information is explosive. This is not just a game of numbers; it is questioning every onlooker: do we really understand the whale’s perspective? What do you think, is their gamble this time a continuation of a myth or the prelude to a storm? The comment section is open, don’t just watch, let’s discuss it together! What do you think about this “whale’s” crazy operation?
$ETH Shocking Action! The mysterious giant whale “1011” is spending again, buying ETH with 30 million USD, leveraging 39,000 coins, is it going crazy?

Hey, friends in the circle, big news is here! Just today (December 8), the mysterious big player codenamed “1011 insider whale” was once again monitored on-chain—without hesitation, they directly poured 30 million USD into their account, all in to increase their long position in Ethereum! This move really doesn’t treat money as money.

What’s the situation now? The ETH long position held by this address has surged to an astonishing 39,000 coins, which is roughly 121.5 million USD at market price! Even more thrilling is that they are playing with about 1.9 times leverage, and just with this operation, the unrealized gains have already comfortably settled at around 3.4 million USD. This is not investment; it’s simply printing money.

Why does the market shake every time they take action? What exactly is this “1011” all about? Is it a capital tycoon with insider knowledge or a gifted market prophet? This series of precise and bold increases is either a display of absolute confidence in Ethereum’s future that we cannot comprehend or setting up a bigger scheme?

A brief piece of news, the information is explosive. This is not just a game of numbers; it is questioning every onlooker: do we really understand the whale’s perspective? What do you think, is their gamble this time a continuation of a myth or the prelude to a storm?

The comment section is open, don’t just watch, let’s discuss it together! What do you think about this “whale’s” crazy operation?
See original
#美联储会议 This week's market is about to explode! Federal Reserve decision + GPT major update + China policy week, all are hot topics Last week, the U.S. economy directly hit the brakes—ADP employment collapsed (down by 32,000, the lowest in two years), core inflation also dropped (2.8%, the coldest in three months), and even unemployment claims decreased, is this the rhythm for interest rate cuts? This week is even more exciting, bringing together the "bomb package": Starting today, a "super policy week" is opening domestically, senior officials + the Central Economic Work Conference will set the tone for next year's direction; whether wallets can be fuller depends on this wave; Tomorrow, OpenAI suddenly announces the early release of GPT-5.2, is this going to refresh the AI ceiling? The day after tomorrow, China’s CPI and M2 data will come in, whether prices have risen or if there's enough money to spend directly affects your grocery shopping and financial management; The following day at dawn, the Federal Reserve will take major actions—interest rate decision + Powell's speech! The entire market is betting on "no rate hike", but if he stubbornly says "we still have to endure", U.S. stocks might dive directly; Oh right, there's also a "shadow chairman of the Federal Reserve" Hassett speaking today, this person dares to say more than Powell, he might even leak policies in advance. Now the market feels like a roller coaster: Federal Reserve easing = global asset carnival, strong Chinese policies = A-shares rising, if GPT-5.2 really can "understand humans instantly", will tech stocks soar directly? #马斯克小奶狗值得关注 Which event do you think will explode first this week? Is it the Federal Reserve's dovish stance, or is GPT going crazy? Place your bets in the comments!
#美联储会议 This week's market is about to explode! Federal Reserve decision + GPT major update + China policy week, all are hot topics

Last week, the U.S. economy directly hit the brakes—ADP employment collapsed (down by 32,000, the lowest in two years), core inflation also dropped (2.8%, the coldest in three months), and even unemployment claims decreased, is this the rhythm for interest rate cuts?

This week is even more exciting, bringing together the "bomb package":
Starting today, a "super policy week" is opening domestically, senior officials + the Central Economic Work Conference will set the tone for next year's direction; whether wallets can be fuller depends on this wave;
Tomorrow, OpenAI suddenly announces the early release of GPT-5.2, is this going to refresh the AI ceiling?
The day after tomorrow, China’s CPI and M2 data will come in, whether prices have risen or if there's enough money to spend directly affects your grocery shopping and financial management;
The following day at dawn, the Federal Reserve will take major actions—interest rate decision + Powell's speech! The entire market is betting on "no rate hike", but if he stubbornly says "we still have to endure", U.S. stocks might dive directly;
Oh right, there's also a "shadow chairman of the Federal Reserve" Hassett speaking today, this person dares to say more than Powell, he might even leak policies in advance.

Now the market feels like a roller coaster: Federal Reserve easing = global asset carnival, strong Chinese policies = A-shares rising, if GPT-5.2 really can "understand humans instantly", will tech stocks soar directly?

#马斯克小奶狗值得关注

Which event do you think will explode first this week? Is it the Federal Reserve's dovish stance, or is GPT going crazy? Place your bets in the comments!
神秘博士
--
[Replay] 🎙️ 牛还在ETH看8500,12月美联储降息+日本加息🎵
05 h 59 m 58 s · 979 listens
See original
#金融巨头喊话 $BTC JPMorgan Chase calls for $170,000! The fate of Bitcoin is in this company's hands Family, whether Bitcoin can soar this time depends entirely on whether one company sells the coin! JPMorgan Chase just stated: Bitcoin could rise to $170,000 in the future, but the prerequisite is that — Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy, stock code MSTR) must hold onto its 650,000 Bitcoins and not sell them! What is Bitcoin's current situation? Miners are fleeing: China's ban + rising electricity prices + falling coin prices have led to a collapse in hash rates, mining costs are $90,000 but coin prices are still inverted, so miners can only frantically sell coins. However, JPMorgan Chase says “miners are not the issue,” the real lifeline is whether Strategy's mNAV (enterprise value ÷ Bitcoin holdings) can hold above 1.0: currently, this number is 1.13; as long as it doesn't drop below 1, they have $1.44 billion in cash to last two years without needing to sell coins; once it falls below 1, or if MSCI kicks it out of the index in January, funds will dump stocks and the company will have to sell coins to save itself, causing the coin price to spiral down. As for whether MSCI will kick it out? The market has already digested the risks — since the news broke in October, Strategy's stock price has fallen by 40%, and what was supposed to drop has already dropped. JPMorgan Chase says, if MSCI really keeps it, the coin price could bounce back to levels seen before October. Finally, to emphasize: JPMorgan Chase bets that Bitcoin can reach $170,000 in 6-12 months, depending on whether Strategy can hold steady with its coins. Do you think Strategy can withstand and not sell its coins? Place your bets in the comments!
#金融巨头喊话 $BTC JPMorgan Chase calls for $170,000! The fate of Bitcoin is in this company's hands

Family, whether Bitcoin can soar this time depends entirely on whether one company sells the coin!

JPMorgan Chase just stated: Bitcoin could rise to $170,000 in the future, but the prerequisite is that — Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy, stock code MSTR) must hold onto its 650,000 Bitcoins and not sell them!

What is Bitcoin's current situation? Miners are fleeing: China's ban + rising electricity prices + falling coin prices have led to a collapse in hash rates, mining costs are $90,000 but coin prices are still inverted, so miners can only frantically sell coins.

However, JPMorgan Chase says “miners are not the issue,” the real lifeline is whether Strategy's mNAV (enterprise value ÷ Bitcoin holdings) can hold above 1.0: currently, this number is 1.13; as long as it doesn't drop below 1, they have $1.44 billion in cash to last two years without needing to sell coins; once it falls below 1, or if MSCI kicks it out of the index in January, funds will dump stocks and the company will have to sell coins to save itself, causing the coin price to spiral down.

As for whether MSCI will kick it out? The market has already digested the risks — since the news broke in October, Strategy's stock price has fallen by 40%, and what was supposed to drop has already dropped. JPMorgan Chase says, if MSCI really keeps it, the coin price could bounce back to levels seen before October.

Finally, to emphasize: JPMorgan Chase bets that Bitcoin can reach $170,000 in 6-12 months, depending on whether Strategy can hold steady with its coins.

Do you think Strategy can withstand and not sell its coins? Place your bets in the comments!
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs