Awakening: Thinking about the issue from the perspective of the project party's "mouse warehouse" in decision-making!

We see many project parties being very "generous", offering many airdrops to the community, while when we look at the economic model, we often see that the team and investment institutions are in a long-term lock-up state. Is the project party doing charity? Are they really prioritizing user and community profits? Why does it crash right after going live, is it the retail investors causing it?

It turns out that methods like deposits, airdrops, staking, and financial management are ways to create a mouse warehouse; these methods are all part of the play!

Gather good VC tokens, then cycle through various CEX exchanges; the public traffic from each exchange is the largest liquidity, and combined with contracts, it makes selling easier! Once the project party has sold enough and made enough profit, the token price plummets; at this time, a buyback plan can come into play, and the secondary market can see another wave, combined with contracts to make another profit. Those who announce buybacks are still considered good; some simply give up, waiting for the next cycle to come back around, time and again!

VC tokens are criticized, and VCs become scapegoats. Most investment institutions cannot even get the goods at TGE; the biggest beneficiaries are the project parties! The project parties are also the main culprits behind the largest profit-making and dumping!

This is why there are more and more asset issuance methods and why there are increasingly more project parties!

Therefore, thinking about problems from the perspective of the project party and the market makers makes everything clear!