etherium

The network $ETH has set a new benchmark for throughput, demonstrating a total figure of around 31,000 transactions per second. At the same time, the overwhelming majority of this volume—about 95%—was processed by second-layer (L2) solutions operating on top of the base layer. Such a result emphasizes that the scaling of the ecosystem occurs not through radical changes to L1 parameters, but by offloading the main transactional load to specialized overlay protocols.

When the price $ETH is once again approaching the zone around $3000, old screenshots with forecasts about $5000 and higher immediately pop up in the feed. On an emotional level, it seems: if the market has already seen such targets in analytical trends, then surpassing $3000 should be a matter of technique. But the market is not obliged to fulfill anyone's expectations. Right now, the $3000 level for ETH is not just a pretty number, but a zone where the interests of those who bought during dips and those who want to lock in profits after a long period of uncertainty converge.

After the widespread adoption of second-layer scaling concepts in the Ethereum ecosystem, a new challenge emerged for the community: how to restore the base chain's status as a fundamental coordination layer amidst numerous partially duplicative and loosely connected solutions. Against this backdrop, developers propose the EIL (Ethereum Interop Layer) standard as an architectural approach that should grant the EVM ecosystem the properties of a unified whole, rather than a set of disparate networks and tools. Essentially, this involves creating a compatibility layer capable of redefining the user experience when working with $ETH and derivative networks.

Solana is one of the fastest and most popular blockchains in the crypto world. It uses a unique technology called Proof of History (PoH), which allows it to process up to 65,000 transactions per second with very low fees. Because of this speed, Solana is often compared to Ethereum but is considered lighter, faster, and cheaper.

The Solana ecosystem is expanding quickly. It now supports DeFi platforms, NFT marketplaces, Web3 games, and payment apps. Popular projects like Phantom Wallet, Jupiter, StepN, and Helium have increased its popularity among users and developers.

Like all cryptocurrencies, Solana’s price is highly volatile. It can rise fast during strong market trends and fall during market corrections. Still, many investors like Solana for its speed, low costs, and strong developer community.

In short, Solana is a powerful blockchain with high potential, but it also carries the usual crypto risks. It remains one of the most watched and promising projects in the crypto space.
#solana #etherium

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has cautioned investors and stakeholders about the precarious balance between innovation and influence. At the recent Devconnect event, Buterin emphasized how increasing institutional capital especially from firms like BlackRock could lead the blockchain away from its decentralized principles. As Ethereum's market value rises and institutional holdings skyrocket, these warnings come at a crucial time, urging the community to protect the network's original values.
Institutional Surge: A Two-Sided Coin for Ethereum
Ethereum has long flourished due to its promise of accessibility and resilience, powering decentralized finance and non-fungible tokens. However, as traditional finance enters the space, Buterin argues that this influx poses hidden dangers. The launch of Ethereum-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs) has accelerated a significant shift: institutions now control a growing portion of ETH supply, raising concerns about who truly controls the network's direction.
Buterin's message is clear: while institutional money confirms Ethereum's legitimacy, it risks undermining the very principles that made it revolutionary. "Concerns are growing that Ethereum could be going in the wrong direction if the institutional share becomes too large," he stated, stressing the need for awareness. This isn't just speculation; data reveals that institutional ETH holdings have increased significantly in recent months, turning a community project into a competition between different visions.
Risk One: Moving Away from Decentralization
Buterin's first warning centers on the potential for community division. Ethereum was created by a global group of developers and enthusiasts who shared a vision of open, censorship-resistant technology. But as institutions accumulate ETH, the network could become a tool primarily serving corporate interests, marginalizing those who established it.
Imagine Ethereum becoming synonymous with Wall Street efficiency rather than global empowerment. Developers, feeling alienated, might leave, taking their innovation with them. This departure wouldn't just slow progress it could damage trust in the protocol's security and adaptability. Buterin illustrates this: if the chain prioritizes high-frequency trading over fair access, the "core decentralized community" that supports it risks disappearing. The result? An empty ecosystem, where only a select few participate.
Risk Two: Technical Decisions Controlled by Few
Buterin's second concern focuses on Ethereum's core infrastructure. Technical upgrades, once openly debated by diverse voices, could increasingly cater to institutional demands. He cited proposals to reduce block generation times to just 150 milliseconds as a prime example.
Faster blocks promise quicker transactions, appealing to traders seeking speed. However, Buterin warns of the consequences: "Such a change would make it difficult for average users to run nodes, and nodes could only be operated by institutions like New York-based financial centers." This would centralize validation power, limiting node operations to well-resourced hubs. Everyday users hobbyists in rural areas or developers in emerging markets would be excluded, turning Ethereum from a permissionless network into one limited by location and capital.
This isn't theoretical; it's a move toward institutional dominance, where upgrades favor speed over inclusion. Ethereum's strength has always been its accessibility, allowing anyone with a laptop to contribute. Undermining that invites not just inefficiency but a betrayal of blockchain's core principles.
Protecting Ethereum's Core
Amid these risks, Buterin reaffirms Ethereum's fundamental values: global accessibility and strong resistance to censorship. "Ethereum's basic structure is accessible to everyone and must be protected against censorship," he stated. "These values must be prioritized over the speed and convenience that institutions want." It's a call for balance using institutional energy without overshadowing the community's voice.
To achieve this, Ethereum's leaders must prioritize governance models that amplify input from retail users and developers. Layer-2 solutions and scalability improvements can deliver institutional-level performance without sacrificing decentralization. By integrating these principles into future plans, the network can evolve inclusively, ensuring its growth benefits all participants.
Broader Challenges Ahead
Buterin's warnings extend beyond immediate risks, addressing fundamental vulnerabilities. He mentioned the threat of quantum computing, which could break elliptic curve cryptography the cryptographic foundation securing Ethereum's transactions potentially before the 2028 U.S. presidential election. This isn't fear-mongering; it's a call to accelerate post-quantum safeguards, combining research with Ethereum's ability to adapt.
As Ethereum faces this critical point, Buterin's words serve as both a warning and a motivator. Investors considering ETH's potential must consider these factors: short-term gains could compromise long-term viability. For the blockchain world, the lesson is clear—true innovation thrives when it stays true to its roots. By heeding these warnings, Ethereum can create a future that's not just successful, but also fair.
#CryptoNews #Etherium $ETH