The Yaprun marathon has just begun. I’m sitting at Rank 166 | TatThang στο Binance Square

Αρχική σελίδα

Ειδοποίηση

Δημοφιλέστερα άρθρα

Με σελιδοδείκτη και "Μου αρέσει"

Ιστορικό

Κέντρο δημιουργού

Ρυθμίσεις

--

The Yaprun marathon has just begun.I’m sitting at Rank 166 this week.
Who’s running this race with me till the finish line?
Let’s climb together 🏁

Αποποίηση ευθυνών: Περιλαμβάνει γνώμες τρίτων. Δεν είναι οικονομική συμβουλή. Ενδέχεται να περιλαμβάνει χορηγούμενο περιεχόμενο. Δείτε τους Όρους και προϋποθέσεις.

2.5k

0

Εξερευνήστε τα τελευταία νέα για τα κρύπτο

⚡️ Συμμετέχετε στις πιο πρόσφατες συζητήσεις για τα κρύπτο

💬 Αλληλεπιδράστε με τους αγαπημένους σας δημιουργούς

👍 Απολαύστε περιεχόμενο που σας ενδιαφέρει

Διεύθυνση email/αριθμός τηλεφώνου

Σχετικός δημιουργός

@tatthang

Ανακαλύψτε περισσότερα από τον Δημιουργό

Kaito Yaps 101: Hiểu và hành động đúng để kiếm Yaps hiệu quả nhất Bài viết này dành riêng cho các anh em Việt Nam đang muốn tìm hiểu và đạt kết quả cao hơn trong cuộc đua Yaps với anh em thế giới Vào việc 👇

--

New Ethos feature just dropped: Listings. Ethos users now get limited “bullish” or “bearish” votes each month to signal which projects they believe in. But here’s what’s interesting 👇

--

Unpopular Opinion: Loud’s attention flywheel might be broken or at least in need of a serious tune-up. I’m not sure what the team plans after the first payout, but here’s what I’ve been thinking: The Loud model was bold, but short-lived. The idea was simple: incentivize top KOLs to generate attention → that attention drives volume → the top 25 KOLs split trading fees. In theory, it’s genius. In practice, it burned hot but faded fast. Since TGE, volume has dropped every single day. - Day 1: $10M+ - Day 6: ~$213K - Market cap: down ~90% from ATH 1. The game wasn’t ready. After just 6 days, there’s very little content left to post. Over 50% of the top 25 climbed the board with engagement bait or shallow threads not necessarily because they lack quality, but because there’s simply not enough substance to talk about yet. Loud didn’t prepare enough narrative fuel to sustain interest. Even the best creators need something to work with. 2. Small creators were sidelined. Let’s be honest: what exactly is the incentive for a small creator to participate? - No realistic shot at leaderboard rewards - No clear holding or loyalty benefits - No structure for discovery or amplification Cheering from the sidelines in hopes that a top KOL might tip you? That’s not a system. That’s a wish. 3. The leaderboard became toxic, fast. By day 5, it wasn’t about who created value. It was about who was louder, who had better “smart follower” ratios, or who gamed the algo better. Instead of building a culture of collaboration, it became a leaderboard of drama. That doesn’t help the project or anyone in it in the long run. The responsibilities and benefits of stakeholders in Loud are built around the top 25 and I think that's still correct. But perhaps we need to reassess these realities to adjust and adapt more appropriately. Because if not, everything Loud has will be like a shooting star passing through CT and no matter how beautiful it once was, people will soon forget.

--

Gm. Happy Friday everyone

--

I’m pretty sure when Yuhu and the Kaito team came up with the Smart Followers metric, they didn’t expect it to turn into something people would start beefing over later. But recently, that’s exactly what’s happening. Some KOLs are now saying if your SF rate is low, then your account is full of bots, low-rep, or you’ve farmed too much low-quality GA content. A few hours ago, I saw Ico criticize a couple of the Top 25 Loudest for having bad SF ratios and suddenly a bunch of people started piling on. And just now, I saw Cape slash Kermit on Ethos over this exact thing. Honestly, It’s funny. But not in a good way. The truth is, everyone has their own journey, their own audience, and their own phase of development. Metrics like SF can be helpful, but using one number to judge someone completely? That feels off. I can name people with insanely high SF/follower ratios but half of CT calls them scammers, and their Ethos score is a mess. So yeah. Take these tools for what they are. Not more, not less.

--

Τελευταία νέα

Ether ETFs Experience Continued Inflows Amid Market Volatility

--

Hong Kong's Strategic Move on Stablecoins: A Key Financial Decision

--

Ether.fi Discord Compromised by Hackers

--

Bitcoin(BTC) Surpasses 105,000 USDT with a 2.11% Increase in 24 Hours

--

Hut 8 Warns Against Fraudulent Activities in Brazil, South Korea, and Hong Kong

--

Προβολή περισσότερων

Χάρτης τοποθεσίας

Προτιμήσεις cookie

Όροι και Προϋπ. της πλατφόρμας

Χάρτης τοποθεσίας

Όροι και Προϋπ. της πλατφόρμας

Προτιμήσεις cookie